Original articleThe use of regression constants in estimating tooth size in a Negro population
References (22)
Linear arch dimension and tooth size
Am. J. Orthod.
(1949)Recognition of the developing malocclusion
Dent. Clin. North Am.
(1959)- et al.
Arch length deficiency in the mixed dentition
Am. J. Orthod.
(1958) Arch size analysis and tooth size prediction
Dent. Clin. North Am.
(1964)Indications for the use of the x-ray in orthodontics
Int. J. Orthod.
(1917)The limitations of orthodontic treatment. I. Mixed dentition diagnosis and treatment
Am. J. Orthod. Oral Surg.
(1947)- et al.
Correlations among crown diameters of human teeth
Arch. Oral Biol.
(1964) When radiology is used to the greatest advantage in orthodontics
Int. J. Orthod.
(1923)- et al.
Mixed dentition case analysis—Estimating size of unerupted permanent teeth
Am. J. Orthod.
(1947) - et al.
The prediction of the size of unerupted canines and premolars in a contemporary orthodontic population
J. Am. Dent. Assoc.
(1974)
Mesiodistal crown dimension of the permanent dentition of American Negroes
Am. J. Orthod.
Cited by (40)
Development of a prediction equation for the mixed dentition in a Pakistani sample
2011, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsCitation Excerpt :The r2 values are indicators of the predictive accuracy of the regression equations. This study showed comparable r2 values for both arches with the Thai subjects,18 but smaller values than for Hong Kong Chinese,21 black American,22,23 Senegalese,19 and Saudi Arabian samples.17 The standard error of the estimate indicates errors in the use of prediction equations.
The validity and reliability of mixeddentition analysis methods: A systematic review
2011, Journal of the American Dental AssociationApplicability of the Moyers mixed dentition probability tables and new prediction aids for a contemporary population in India
2010, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsCitation Excerpt :The sample representation of this study was considered acceptable because of the large sample size (300 subjects of each sex) and the uniform ethnicity (Punjabi). Definite racial and ethnic differences in tooth sizes have been highlighted in several population studies14-21 (Table I). Nanda and Chawla28 found a significant disparity between the leeway space of North Indian children and the leeway space that was reported by Nance29 for American children.
New regression equations for mixed-dentition arch analysis in a Turkish sample with no Bolton tooth-size discrepancy
2009, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsCitation Excerpt :The r and r2 values for the Turkish sample between the buccal segment of each arch and the mandibular incisors were found to be the highest in both sexes when compared with the other studies. Among people of various racial and ethnic origins, tooth dimensions and craniofacial characteristics differ.2,7,9,10,12-14,16-25 Some of the most used methods to predict widths of unerupted posterior permanent teeth were developed for North Americans.3,6,8
Mandibular permanent first molar and incisor width as predictor of mandibular canine and premolar width
2007, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsCitation Excerpt :A high value of ICC (0.995) was found, indicating great measurement precision and repeatability. This value for ICC was similar to those described by others.6,8,21,22,24,33,41-43 Thus, mesiodistal widths of all 500 casts were measured only once.
- ∗
Assistant Professor, Department of Children's Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, Health Sciences Center, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
- ∗∗
Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, University of Connecticut Health Center.
- ∗∗∗
Assistant Professor, Department of Pedodontics, New Jersey College of Medicine and Dentistry.
- ∗∗∗∗
Associate Professor, Department of Dental Health, School of Dental Medicine, State University if New York at Stony Brook.