Original article
Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: An analogy to diagnostic test performance

https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(86)90038-XGet rights and content

Abstract

One characteristic of newer health or functional status scales which has received little attention is their responsiveness over time to clinical change. In part, this is because methods for assessing this characteristic are crude and not well standardized. We suggest that scales be viewed as “diagnostic tests” for discriminating between improved and unimproved patients. With this perspective, one may construct receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves describing a scale's ability to detect improvement (or failure to improve) using some external criterion. This method is illustrated using data from a study of acute low back pain, comparing the Sickness Impact Profile, its major subscales, and a shorter, more disease-specific scale. The results demonstrate an advantage of the ROC approach over simple pre- and post-treatment score comparisons in assessing scale responsiveness. They also suggest some advantage for a brief disease-specific scale over the lengthier “generic” SIP.

References (21)

  • B Kirshner et al.

    A methodological framework for assessing health indices

    J Chron Dis

    (1985)
  • RA Deyo

    Measuring functional outcomes in therapeutic trials for chronic disease

    Controlled Clin Trials

    (1984)
  • American Psychological Association

    Standards for educational and psychological tests

    (1974)
  • MS Kramer et al.

    Clinical biostatistics LIV: the biostatistics of concordance

    Clin Pharmacol Ther

    (1981)
  • RA Deyo et al.

    Toward clinical applications of health status measures: sensitivity of scales to clinically important changes

    Health Serv Res

    (1984)
  • M Bergner et al.

    The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure

    Med Care

    (1981)
  • M Roland et al.

    A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain

    Spine

    (1983)
  • RA Deyo

    Pitfalls in measuring the health status of Mexican Americans: comparative validity of the English and Spanish Sickness Impact Profile

    Am J Public Health

    (1984)
  • WB Carter et al.

    Validation of an interval scaling: the Sickness Impact Profile

    Health Serv Res

    (1976)
  • RF Meenan et al.

    Outcome assessment in clinical trials: evidence for the sensitivity of a health status measure

    Arth Rheum

    (1984)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (683)

View all citing articles on Scopus

Preparation of this paper was assisted by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton, New Jersey. The opinions, conclusions, and proposals in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

View full text