Comparing autistic and normal children along the dimensions of reinforcement maximization, stimulus sampling, and responsiveness to extinction

https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(85)90095-5Get rights and content

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess autistic children's ability to maximize reinforcement, sample among available stimuli, and respond to extinction. Responding to five concurrent reinforcement schedules (CRF, FR 2, FR 4, FR 7, and FR 11) was monitored and compared to groups of mental age-matched and chronological age-matched normal children. When a given child consistently selected a given schedule of reinforcement, it was then put on extinction, and both perseveration and responding to the remaining (intact) schedules of reinforcement were monitored. The results showed, first, that while normal children selected the richest schedule of reinforcement, autistics did not maximize reinforcement, typically selecting one of the thinner schedules available. Second, the autistic children sampled less, and less efficiently, than the normal children. Third, the autistic children proved to be much less responsive to extinction, perseverating longer than the normal children before switching to a new reinforcement schedule. Fourth, whenever extinction proved to be a problem in the autistics, it was quickly achieved by a simple change in the stimulus conditions. These results are discussed as possible “keystone” deficits, which may be causally related to many of the behavioral deficits of autism and which might be important target behaviors for treatment.

References (40)

  • R.J. Herrnstein

    On the law of effect

    Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

    (1970)
  • R.J. Herrnstein et al.

    Maximizing and matching on concurrent ratio schedules

    Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

    (1975)
  • P.W. Holmes

    Conditioned suppression with extinction as the signalled stimulus

    Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

    (1972)
  • M.H. Jones et al.

    Effects of age differences on choice behavior

    Child Development

    (1960)
  • L. Kanner

    Autistic disturbances of affective contact

    Nervous Child

    (1943)
  • R.L. Koegel et al.

    Some detrimental effects of using extra stimuli to guide learning in normal and autistic children

    Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

    (1976)
  • R.L. Koegel et al.

    Research on the difference between generalization and maintenance in extratherapy responding

    Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

    (1977)
  • E.R. Long et al.

    Intermittent reinforcement of aperant behavior in children

    Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior

    (1958)
  • O.I. Lavaas et al.

    Experimental studies in childhood schizophrenia: An analysis of self-destructive behavior

    Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

    (1965)
  • O.I. Lovaas et al.

    Some generalization and follow-up measures on autistic children in behavior therapy

    Journal of Aplied Behavior Analysis

    (1973)
  • Cited by (20)

    • An examination of response variability in children with autism and the relationship to restricted repetitive behavior subtypes

      2015, Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      Restricted repetitive behaviors may be regarded as a lack of behavioral variability as such behaviors are, by definition, invariable (Rodriguez & Thompson, 2014). Early research has previously demonstrated that children diagnosed with autism are prone to perseveration (Mullins & Rincover, 1985); do not sample available options in their environment (Boucher, 1977), and often respond to a limited portion of their environment (Lovaas, Schreibman, Koegel, & Rehm, 1971). In addition, they frequently demonstrate repetitive body movements and object manipulations, insistence on sameness of environment or daily routines and circumscribed interests (Gabriels et al., 2008).

    • Increasing response variability in children with autism spectrum disorder using lag schedules of reinforcement

      2013, Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      The authors found that variability in tacting increased for both participants and these gains were maintained at a three-week follow up. Individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have been shown to demonstrate deficits in variability in responding across multiple repertoires (Boucher, 1977; Lee, McComas & Jawor, 2002; Mullins & Rincover, 1985). The current research aimed to identify possible remediation strategies for this.

    • Teaching children with autism to initiate and sustain cooperative play

      2000, Research in Developmental Disabilities
      Citation Excerpt :

      One explanation for the lack of responsiveness to social events seen in autistic children may be related to the apparent difficulty of making autistic children’s behavior sensitive to social reinforcers (Ferster, 1961; Lovaas & Newsom, 1976; Lovaas et al., 1965; Schreibman, 1988). The stereotyped pattern of behavior often seen in these children may preempt contact with alternate sources of reinforcement and could explain their lack of sensitivity to social events (Koegel & Covert, 1972; Mullins & Rincover, 1985; see also Harris et al., 1994). On the other hand, stereotypical behavior may as well be an outcome of behavioral insensitivity to social events.

    • "Tunnel vision": A possible keystone stimulus control deficit in autistic children

      1986, Analysis and Intervention In Developmental Disablities
    • Stalking, Autism, and the Law

      2021, Handbook of Autism Spectrum Disorder and the Law
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Publication of this research was supported in part by Grants, G00780284 from the U.S. Department of Education and Grant 1090 from the Ontario Ministry of Health.

    View full text