A clinical and biological validation of the DSM-III melancholia diagnosis in men: Results of pattern recognition methods
References (54)
- et al.
Separation of subtypes of depression using discriminant analysis
Journal of Affective Disorders
(1983) - et al.
Thyrotrophin response to thryotrophin-releasing hormone in unipolar and bipolar affective illness
Journal of Affective Disorders
(1981) - et al.
Clinical subtypes of unipolar depression, part I: A validation of the vital and non-vital clusters
Psychiatry Research
(1990) - et al.
Sex-related differences in the relationships between self-rated depression and biological markers
Journal of Affective Disorders
(1988) - et al.
Prediction of subtype and severity of depression by means of dexamethason suppression test, L-tryptophan/competing amino acid ratio, and MHPG flow
Biological Psychiatry
(1987) - et al.
Clinical subtypes of unipolar depression, part III: Quantitative differences in various biological markers between the cluster analysis-generated non-vital and vital depression classes
Psychiatry Research
(1990) - et al.
The symptom profiles of biological markers in depression: A multivariate study
Psychoneuroendocrinology
(1990) - et al.
Biological heterogeneity of melancholia: Results of pattern recognition methods
Journal of Psychiatric Research
(1991) - et al.
Clinical subtypes of unipolar depression, Part II: Quantitative and qualitative clinical differences between the vital and non-vital depression groups
Psychiatry Research
(1990) - et al.
A revised interpretation of the TRH test results in female depressed patients, part I: TSH responses. Effects of severity of illness, thyroid hormones , monoamines, age, sex hormonal, corticosteroid and nutritional state
Journal of Affective Disorders
(1989)
The decreased availability of L-tryptophan in depressed females: clinical and biological correlates
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
Response to treatment and depressive classification
Distinct quality of depressed mood: An attempt to develop an objective measure
Journal of Affective Disorders
Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
Diagnostic and Statistical manual of mental disorders
The diagnosis of depressive syndromes and the prediction of ECT response
British Journal of Psychiatry
The dexamethason suppression test for melancholia
British Journal of Psychiatry
Dexamethasone suppression test in depression and other psychiatric illness
British Journal of Psychiatry
SIMCA (soft independent modelling of class analogy) demonstrated with characterization and classification of Italian olive oil
Journal of the Association of Analytical Chemistry
On classification of mental disorder
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Separation of subtypes of depression using discriminant analysis. I. Separation of unipolar endogenous depression from non-endogenous depression
British Journal of Psychiatry
A rating scale for depression
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry
Multiaxial systems of classification
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Depression and the Newcastle scale. Their relationship to the dexamethasone suppression test
British Journal of Psychiatry
Depression and Eating Disorders
Endogenous and neurotic depression
British Journal of Psychiatry
The role of diagnosis in psychiatry
Cited by (33)
Atypical depression and non-atypical depression: Is HPA axis function a biomarker? A systematic review
2018, Journal of Affective DisordersCitation Excerpt :A specifier introduced in DSM-III (3rd ed.; DSM–III; American Psychiatric Association, 1980), depression with melancholic features represents a subtype of depression clinically characterised by a distinct pattern of low mood, anhedonia, lack of reactivity to positive events, loss of appetite and weight, insomnia, loss of libido and diurnal mood variations. Although depression with "me-lancholic features" has been validated extensively (Shotte et al., 1997; Juruena et al., 2011; Parker et al., 2015), there is still little agreement among researchers regarding the particular set of features that define it (Maes et al., 1992; Leventhal et al., 2005; Fink et al., 2007; Parker et al., 2013). Besides, the various diagnostic measures used for identifying melancholic depression have shown a considerable degree of inconsistency, as exemplified by the comparison of Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) endogenous depression definition, Newcastle scale endogenous depression definition, and DSM-III and DSM-IV diagnoses of melancholic depression (Rush and Weissenburger, 1994; Coryell, 2007 Orsel et al., 2010).
Beyond Lumping and Splitting: A Review of Computational Approaches for Stratifying Psychiatric Disorders
2016, Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and NeuroimagingCitation Excerpt :One of the most striking features evident from Tables 1–5 is that the outcomes of clustering are heavily dependent on the input data; the overall picture derived from the literature is a profusion of different ways to subtype psychiatric disorders with relatively little convergence onto a coherent and consistent set of subtypes (19,50). The disorder with the most consistent stratifications across studies is major depression, where many (53–56), but not all (57–59) studies report evidence for “typical” (melancholic) and “atypical” subtypes, although these often do not align with the classical DSM subtypes (60). In contrast, stratifications of schizophrenia, ADHD, and autism have been much more variable across studies.
Diagnostic classifications in depression and somatization should include biomarkers, such as disorders in the tryptophan catabolite (TRYCAT) pathway
2012, Psychiatry ResearchCitation Excerpt :The distances between the models are computed and expressed in S.D.s. When the distances are greater than 2 S.D.s, qualitative differences between the clusters exist, whereas a distance < 2 S.D.s indicates that there are no significant (qualitative) differences between the groups (Derde and Massart, 1982, Massart and Kaufman, 1983; Maes et al., 1990; Maes et al., 1992). Using the four rating scales and the TRYCAT biomarkers as modeling and discriminatory variables and the clusters as classes, we found that the distances between the control group and the +TRYCAT (3.37 S.D.s) and −TRYCAT patient group (2.40 S.D.s) were significant.
The validity of diagnosis of melancholic depression according to different diagnostic systems
1999, Journal of Affective Disorders