Binocular rivalry: Suppression depends on orientation and spatial frequency

https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(82)90010-4Get rights and content

Abstract

In binocular rivalry the time during which different stimuli are perceived depends—amongst other things—on their spatial frequency (sf) contents, on contrast and on orientation. Limiting the sf-range of both periodic and aperiodic stimuli in different ways (while keeping the contrast constant) decreased their predominance. This result seems to corroborate the concept of spatial frequency channels in human vision. Decreasing the contrast also decreased predominance. Thus blurred patterns are suppressed by sharply focused ones because of both their lower contrast and their loss of high sf's. This has consequences for the therapy of strabismic amblyopia. Obliquely oriented patterns were almost as dominant as vertical ones and much more than horizontal ones. Instead of a conventional “oblique-effect” we found a “vertical-effect”.

References (64)

  • AlexanderL.T. et al.

    Figure-Ground contrast and binocular rivalry

    J. exp. Psychol.

    (1952)
  • AndrewsD.P.

    Perception of contours in the central fovea

    Nature

    (1965)
  • AppelleS.

    Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: The “oblique effect” in man and animals

    Psychol. Bull.

    (1972)
  • BarfieldL.P.

    Interaction in the human visual system between sinusoidal gratings of harmonically related spatial frequencies

    J. Physiol., Lond.

    (1976)
  • BlakeR.

    Threshold conditions for binocular rivalry

    J. exp. Psychol.

    (1977)
  • BlakeR. et al.

    Adaptation to invisible gratings and the site of binocular rivalry suppression

    Nature

    (1974)
  • BlakeR. et al.

    Stochastic properties of stabilized image binocular rivalry alternations

    J. exp. Psychol.

    (1971)
  • BraitenbergV.

    Cell assemblies in the cerebral cortex

  • BreeseB.B.

    Binocular rivalry

    Psychol. Rev.

    (1909)
  • CampbellF.W. et al.

    The effect of orientation on the visual resolution of gratings

    J. Physiol., Lond.

    (1966)
  • CampbellF.W. et al.

    Application of Fourier Analysis to the visibility of gratings

    J. Physiol., Lond.

    (1968)
  • CowanJ.D.

    Some remarks on channel bandwidth for visual contrast detection

  • DörrenhausW.

    Musterspezifischer visueller Wettstreit

    Naturwissenschaften

    (1975)
  • EmsleyH.H.

    Irregular astigmatism of the eye: Effect of correcting lenses

    Trans. opt. Soc., Lond.

    (1925)
  • FoxR. et al.

    The nonselectivity of rivalry suppression

    Invest. Ophthal. visual sci., suppl.

    (1981)
  • FoxR. et al.

    Binocular rivalry and reciprocal inhibition

    Percept. Psychophys.

    (1969)
  • FrenchJ.W.

    The unaided eye

    Trans. opt. Soc., Lond.

    (1920)
  • GellhornE. et al.

    Quantitative Untersuchungenüber den Wettstreit der Sehfelder. I. Der Einfluβ der Helligkeit der Farben

    Pflügers Arch. ges. Physiol.

    (1924)
  • GellhornE. et al.

    Quantitative Untersuchungenüber den Wettstreit der Sehfelder. II. DieÄnderungen des Wettstreites durch Umstimmung des Sehorgans

    Pflüger Arch. ges. Physiol.

    (1924)
  • GoodmanJ.W.

    Introduction to Fourier-Optics

    (1968)
  • HaaseW.

    Über die Indikation zur Penalisation bei der Behandlung des frühkindlichen Strabismus

    Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk

    (1974)
  • HartridgeH.

    The visual perception of fine detail

    Phil. Trans. R. Soc., Lond.

    (1947)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Present address: Universitäts—Augenklinik, Schleichstrasse 12, D-7400 Tubingen, FRG.

    View full text