Elsevier

Human Pathology

Volume 26, Issue 8, August 1995, Pages 873-879
Human Pathology

Original contribution
Histological grading of breast carcinomas: A study of interobserver agreement

https://doi.org/10.1016/0046-8177(95)90010-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Interobserver variation in the histological grading of breast carcinoma was investigated using the hypothesis that optimal fixation, more precise grading guidelines, some experience, the use of training and test sets, and a comparison of results with an expert group might allow higher levels of agreement. For the training sets sections from 50 consecutive cases of breast carcinoma received at the Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital (SCGH) and fixed in both B5 and buffered formal saline (BFS) were graded by consensus of three pathologists at the SCGH and independently by consensus of two pathologists at the Nottingham City Hospital (NCH) using a modified Scarff-BloomRichardson histological grading system with guidelines as suggested by NCH pathologists. The section quality and degree of preservation of nuclear morphology were judged by NCH pathologists to be superior for B5-fixed material. Complete agreement in grade between SCGH and NCH results was achieved for 83.3% of B5-fixed cases and 73.5% of BFS-fixed cases (P = .05) with relative disagreement rates (RDRs) of 0.15 and 0.29 and kappa statistic values of 0.73 and 0.58, respectively. Approximately 80% complete agreement was achieved for tubule formation, nuclear score, and mitotic count, with RDRs ranging from 0.19 to 0.27 and kappa values from 0.46 to 0.69. There was a consistent bias in the SCGH results toward a higher tubule score in both B5- and BFS-fixed material because of a difference in interpretation of cribriform or complex gland patterns and a consistent bias in SCGH results toward a lower nuclear size/pleomorphism score for B5 and BFS material. For the test set sections from 50 further consecutive cases of breast cancer fixed in B5 were examined using similar criteria but taking into account the sources of error shown by the training set. Approximately 80% complete agreement was again achieved for grade components and grade (RDRs, 0.18 and 0.72). Systematic bias was reduced in the test set, but no other improvement was observed. Of the tumors designated as grade I by NCH, 87.5% were called grade I tumors by SCGH in the B5 training set, 84.6% in the B5 test set, and 66.6% in the BFS training set. The levels of agreement shown in both the training and test sets were satisfactory and represented a significant improvement over our previous study, suggesting that experience and precise grading guidelines are of value. The similar levels of agreement in training and test sets suggest that reasonable results can be achieved without direct training by expert groups. The value of optimal fixation may be the most important variable noted by the study.

References (30)

  • G Contesso et al.

    The importance of histologic grade in long-term prognosis of breast cancer: A study of 1010 patients, uniformly treated at the Institut Gustave-Roussy

    J Clin Oncol

    (1987)
  • BW Davis et al.

    Prognostic significance of tumor grade in clinical trials of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer with axillary lymph node metastasis

    Cancer

    (1986)
  • CW Elston et al.

    Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: Experience from a large study with long-term follow-up

    Histopathology

    (1991)
  • DE Henson et al.

    Relationship among outcome, stage of disease and histologic grade for 22, 616 cases of breast cancer

  • MH Galea et al.

    The Nottingham prognostic index in primary breast cancer

    Breast Cancer Res Treat

    (1992)
  • Cited by (372)

    • MultiNet: A deep neural network approach for detecting breast cancer through multi-scale feature fusion

      2022, Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences
    • ONEST (Observers Needed to Evaluate Subjective Tests) suggests four or more observers for a reliable assessment of the consistency of histological grading of invasive breast carcinoma: A reproducibility study with a retrospective view on previous studies

      2022, Pathology Research and Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      Following a Dutch nationwide study documenting relevant inter- and intradepartmental variations in the distribution of histological grades [38], both anonymized specific feedback to the laboratories and pathologists [39] and e-learning [40] have helped to decrease this variation. Not least, optimal tissue preservation is also required for adequate grading, better fixation has been documented to result in better grading consistency [22]. When looking at national databases or greater cohorts of patients, it also appears that the frequency of a given grade may be different.

    • Automated detection and grading of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma breast cancer using ensemble of deep learning models

      2021, Computers in Biology and Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      During the examination, pathologists grade the cancer stage depending on the severity of the tumor cells which is a crucial step before prognosis. However, both the detection and grading of IDC are tedious and laborious tasks and these often contribute to inter-observer and intra-observer heterogeneity during diagnosis [14,26]. Therefore, CAD-based systems can assist pathologists to detect abnormal cells and make the whole process much easier and faster.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Dr Robbins is supported by the Prindiville Family Scholarship.

    View full text