Hemisphere dynamics in lexical access: Automatic and controlled priming☆
References (50)
Hemispheric asymmetry in lexical access and phonological encoding
Neuropsychologia
(1981)- et al.
Choosing sides: On the variability of language lateralization in normal subjects
Neuropsychologia
(1984) The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
(1973)Preservation of orthographic information in aphasia
Brain and Language
(1981)- et al.
Selective semantic-lexical impairement of language comprehension in right brain-damaged patients
Brain and Language
(1981) - et al.
The appreciation of antonymic contrasts in aphasia
Brain and Language
(1978) Verbal comprehension in aphasia: An English version of three Italian tests
Cortex
(1974)- et al.
Lexical decision and aphasia: Evidence for semantic processing
Brain and Language
(1981) The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Neuropsychologia
(1971)- et al.
The nature of task-stimulus interaction in the tachistoscopic recognition of kana and kanji words
Brain and Language
(1980)
Reading by the disconnected right hemisphere: An aphasiological perspective
Phonological encoding and ideographic reading by the disconnected right hemisphere: Two case studies
Brain and Language
Semantic feature representations for normal and aphasic language
Brain and Language
Language, memory, and thought
Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms
Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs
Right-hemisphere language: A review of interrelated issues
Brain and Language
Semantic and syntactic processes in aphasia: A review of the literature
Psychological Bulletin
Hemispheric differences in a letter classification task
Perception & Psychophysics
Individual differences in reading strategies in relation to cerebral asymmetry
A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing
Psychological Review
Deep dyslexia: A right-hemisphere hypothesis
Some factors involved in the recognition of words
Associative facilitation without expectancy in a lexical decision task
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Latency of associative activation in memory
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Cited by (158)
List constituency and orthographic and phonological processing: A shift to high familiarity words from low familiarity words
2014, NeuropsychologiaCitation Excerpt :The commonalities facilitate recognition by global shape if the target is a familiar entry in the mental lexicon. Traditional lateralized presentation has shown facilitation in both hemispheres; however, facilitation is greater to targets in the LVF than RVF in lexical decision to words (Chiarello, 1985; Lavidor and Ellis, 2003) and in repetition priming of a word-stem completion task (Marsolek et al., 1992, 1994), suggesting that the RH prefers orthographic processing. The new procedure also found facilitation in both hemispheres; however, performance to unprimed word strings was faster and more accurate to targets presented with a distractor to the RVF (RH processing of the target) than the LVF (LH processing of the target) (Rutherford and Mathesius, 2012), suggesting the RH has better baseline processing of orthography.
Cognitive consequences of individual differences in arousal asymmetry
2013, Brain and CognitionHemispheric interaction, task complexity, and emotional valence: Evidence from naturalistic images
2013, Brain and CognitionNeuropsychology of lexical ambiguity resolution: The contribution of divided visual field studies
2013, Lexical Ambiguity Resolution: Perspective from Psycholinguistics, Neuropsychology and Artificial Intelligence
- ☆
This research is based on the author's doctoral dissertation submitted to the University of California, Berkeley. This study was supported by a National Institute of Mental Health predoctoral fellowship (NRSA 1 F31 MH08705-01), the University of California Chancellor's Fund, and the Association for Women in Science.