Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 341, Issue 8860, 19 June 1993, Pages 1573-1574
The Lancet

CLINICAL PRACTICE
Physiological scoring systems and audit

https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(93)90706-MGet rights and content

References (14)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (48)

  • Mortality Prediction After Cardiac Surgery: Higgins’ Intensive Care Unit Admission Score Revisited

    2020, Annals of Thoracic Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Before discussing the significance of the results we need to consider a couple of methodological strengths and limitations. Our revised Higgins model comprised 11 variables available on admission to the ICU, thus avoiding the drawbacks of collecting data during the first 24 hours in the ICU.28,29 The candidate variables were limited to those used by Higgins and coworkers,2 with some variables exchanged as described above, since a customized version of the Higgins score has been used in Sweden for 2 decades.

  • Paediatric and adolescent trauma care within an integrated trauma system

    2012, Injury
    Citation Excerpt :

    In terms of services required the 0–4 and the 15–17 year olds placed greatest demands on ICU having the greatest rates of ventilation. An important indication of the performance of a trauma system is the outcome of the most severely injured trauma patients surviving to hospital admission, i.e. those admitted to the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU).33–35 Previous work analysing the Victorian paediatric intensive care system advocated the centralisation of specialist paediatric intensive care units.36

  • Children in Sweden admitted to intensive care after trauma

    2007, Injury
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, this study did not aim to evaluate the different scoring systems. An important indication of a trauma centre's performance is the outcome of the most severely injured trauma patients surviving to hospital admission, i.e. those admitted to the PICU.3,19,29 On completion of this study we found few other studies of this patient population with multiple injuries.

  • Effect of varying the case mix on the standardized mortality ratio and W statistic: A simulation study

    2000, Chest
    Citation Excerpt :

    The APACHE prognostic scoring systems (APACHE II and III) are perhaps the best known and most widespread predictive models currently in use.15 Boyd and Grounds16 have suggested that the use of the SMR based on APACHE to assess ICU performance is problematic because the number of APACHE points that a patient will receive is a function not only of how sick the patient is, but also of the therapy he receives. If two groups of patients admitted in the same condition to two different ICUs receive two different levels of care, the patients receiving poorer care (leading to worse outcomes) may accumulate more APACHE points and, thus, have a higher predicted mortality than the patients receiving superior care (who have better outcomes).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text