Main article
Somatotopy of human hand somatosensory cortex revealed by dipole source analysis of early somatosensory evoked potentials and 3D-NMR tomography

https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-5597(94)00228-7Get rights and content

Abstract

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to median nerve and finger stimulation were analyzed by means of spatio-temporal dipole modelling combined with 3D-NMR tomography in 8 normal subjects. The early SEPs were modelled by 3 equivalent dipoles located in the region of the brain-stem (B) and in the region of the contralateral somatosensory cortex (T and R). Dipole B explained peaks P14 and N18 at the scalp. Dipole T was tangentially oriented and explained the N20-P20, dipole R was radially oriented and modelled the P22. The tangential dipole sources T were located within a distance of 6 mm on the average and all were less than 9 mm from the posterior bank of the central sulcus. In 6 subjects the tangential sources related to finger stimulation arranged along the central sulcus according to the known somatotopy. The radial sources did not show a consistent somatotopic alignment across subjects. We conclude that the combination of dipole source analysis and 3D-NMR tomography is a useful tool for functional localization within the human hand somatosensory cortex.

References (59)

  • M. Merzenich et al.

    Progression of change following median nerve section in the cortical representation of the hand in areas 3b and 1 in adult owl and squirrel monkeys

    Neurosience

    (1983)
  • J.C. Mosher et al.

    Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization

    Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1993)
  • H.G. Raroque et al.

    Lower brain-stem origin of the medial nerve N18 potential

    Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1994)
  • M. Scherg et al.

    Two bilateral sources of the late AEP as identified by a spatio-temporal dipole model

    Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1985)
  • M. Scherg et al.

    Evoked dipole source potentials of the human auditory cortex

    Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1986)
  • J. Suk et al.

    Anatomical localization revealed by MEG recordings of the human somatosensory system

    Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1991)
  • V.L. Towle et al.

    The spatial location of EEG electrodes: locating the best-fitting sphere relative to cortical anatomy

    Electoenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1993)
  • A. Achim et al.

    Methods for seperating temporally overlapping sources of neuroelectric data

    Brain Topogr.

    (1988)
  • L. Adams et al.

    Computer-assisted surgery

    IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl.

    (1990)
  • T. Allison et al.

    Human cortical potentials evoked by stimulation of the median nerve. I. Cytoarchitectonic areas generating short-latency activity

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1989)
  • T. Allison et al.

    Potentials evoked in human and monkey cerebral cortex by stimulation of the median nerve

    Brain

    (1991)
  • J.P. Ary et al.

    Location of sources of evoked scalp potentials; correction of skull and scalp thickness

    IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.

    (1981)
  • C. Baumgartner et al.

    Neuromagnetic investigation of somatotopy of human hand somatosensory cortex

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (1991)
  • H. Buchner et al.

    Analyse der Generatoren früher kortikaler somatosensibel evozierter Potentiale (N. medianus) mit der Dipolquellenanalyse: erste Ergebnisse

    Z. EEG-EMG

    (1991)
  • H. Buchner et al.

    The subcortical generated somatosensory evoked potentials in non-cephalic, cephalic and anterior neck referenced recordings in a patient with a cervicomedullary lesion: a cue to the identification of the P14/N14 and N13 generators

    J. Neurol.

    (1987)
  • H. Buchner et al.

    Preoperative localization of the central sulcus by dipole source analysis of early somatosensory evoked potentials and 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging

    J. Neurochir.

    (1994)
  • H. Buchner et al.

    Source analysis of median nerve and finger stimulated somatosensory evoked potentials: multichannel simultaneous recording of electric and magnetic fields combined with 3D-MR tomography

    Brain Topogr.

    (1994)
  • D. Cohen et al.

    MEG versus EEG localization test using implanted sources in the human brain

    Ann. Neurol.

    (1990)
  • B.N. Cuffin et al.

    Tests of EEG localisation accuracy using implanted sources in the human brain

    Ann. Neurol.

    (1991)
  • Cited by (100)

    • Reconstructing subcortical and cortical somatosensory activity via the RAMUS inverse source analysis technique using median nerve SEP data

      2021, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      In (Buchner et al., 1995a), its visibility in the stimulation of the right median nerve has been shown for C3, F3 and P3 electrode of a standard 10–20 electrode cap with average reference. The P14 positive far-field peak is generated at 14 ms latency in the brainstem region, particularly, in the medial lemniscus (Buchner et al., 1995a; Mauguière et al., 1983; Noël et al., 1996). The turning point between P14 and N14 is located at the medulla-pontine junction.

    • Posterior insular activity contributes to the late laser-evoked potential component in EEG recordings

      2021, Clinical Neurophysiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In contrast to hemodynamic imaging studies, electrical and magnetic scalp recordings are far less sensitive to detect activity in deep structures such as thalamus (Th), hippocampus or prefrontal cortex (PFC), although recent attempts were promising in part (Papadelis et al. 2012; Attal and Schwartz 2013). Since localization accuracy worsens with increasing distance from the scalp (Buchner et al. 1995) especially if the signal-to-noise ratio is low (Whittingstall et al. 2003), the absence of Th and PFC activity in EEG recordings might be due to their deep location inside the brain. Thus, neither method could clearly depict activity from these areas.

    • Hebbian associative plasticity in the visuo-tactile domain: A cross-modal paired associative stimulation protocol

      2019, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      Such a difference in latency is likely due to the distinct neural pathways involved in the cm-PAS compared to classical S1-PAS (Lacey and Sathian, 2016). Although most of the studies on SEPs in humans focused on earlier components evoked by MN electrical stimulation (i.e., P14–N20–P25–N30, also detected in our experiment, but not affected by cm-PAS, see Fig. 4C; e.g., Buchner et al., 1995; Macerollo et al., 2018; Mauguière et al., 1999), there is evidence suggesting that P40 originates at the cortical level, specifically in S1 (Allison et al., 1991, 1989; Gorgoni et al., 2014; Matsunaga et al., 2004) and that it could be associated with a first cognitive processing of the tactile stimulus (Desmedt et al., 1983). Interestingly, the cortical origin of P40 seems to be localized in Broadman’s areas (BA) 1 and 2, while earlier components, such as N20 and P25, in BA 3b (Allison et al., 1991, 1989; Gorgoni et al., 2014).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text