Assessment of health producing measures across different sectors
References (40)
- et al.
Producing health, consuming health care
Social Science and Medicine
(1990) - et al.
Economic analysis and clinical trials
Controlled Clinical Trials
(1984) - et al.
Economic aspects of health education
Social Science and Medicine
(1986) - et al.
Economic evaluation in health care: is there a role for cost-benefit analysis?
Health Policy
(1991) A QALY is a QALY is a QALY; or is it?
Journal of Health Economics
(1988)- et al.
Utilization as a measure of equity: weighing heat?
Journal of Health Economics
(1991) - et al.
Utilization as a measure of equity: comment
Journal of Health Economics
(1992) - et al.
- et al.
Health care : an update on the growth and composition of the literature
Medical Care
(1993) - et al.
The production of health: an exploratory study
Journal of Human Resources
(1969)
Social relationships and health
Science
The Health Economy
Health care spending as a risk to health
Canadian Journal of Public Health
Health promotion through healthy public policy: the contribution of complementary research methods
Canadian Journal of Public Health
Toward a social policy for health
New England Journal of Medicine
Cost-benefit Analysis
Reflections on the meaning of efficiency: can efficiency be separated from equity?
Yale Law and Policy Review
Cited by (27)
Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds in Global Health: Taking a Multisectoral Perspective
2017, Value in HealthCitation Excerpt :This conventional approach that underpins many health economic evaluations often focuses on a single-sectoral payer that seeks to maximize health, typically through interventions delivered by the health care system. This approach risks missing two critical issues: first, multiple “sectors” contribute to the production of health, and second, some of the goods and services produced by the “health sector,” or the healthcare system, have multiple benefits besides health [16,17]. There is a solid and growing body of evidence on the social determinants of health, which include poverty, education, gender inequity, housing, and transport, among many others [18–21].
A prospective mini health impact assessment of the 'Towards 2010' programme in Sandwell and West Birmingham in the West Midlands
2007, Public HealthCitation Excerpt :However, options C and D appear to offer the maximum opportunity for a whole system change and a potential to link into the wider regeneration initiatives. The development of new healthcare facilities can improve health through the provision of improved services, job opportunities and economic activity.15 However, impact assessments can prove vital to evade the consequences of environmental degradation, poverty exacerbation and social disruption.16
Public health: Some economic perspectives
2020, Economics and Australian Health PolicyShaping policy change in population health: Policy entrepreneurs, ideas, and institutions
2018, International Journal of Health Policy and Management