Elsevier

Health Policy

Volume 33, Issue 3, September 1995, Pages 219-231
Health Policy

Assessment of health producing measures across different sectors

https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(94)00717-SGet rights and content

Abstract

To date, economic evaluation of health producing measures has concentrated on health care treatments and technologies. However, it is increasingly being recognized that many health promoting measures are in other sectors, such as education, safety programmes, income maintenance and improvements to the physical environment. This paper examines the principles of assessing health promoting measures across different sectors and reviews current practice. Such assessments pose methodological challenges not often encountered in health care evaluations, in framing the evaluation, in identifying, measuring and valuing costs and benefits, and in interpreting results. It is concluded that intersectoral economic evaluation is unlikely to provide a complete technical solution to the problem of allocating resources within and between sectors of the economy, but that the application of an economic way of thinking could yield benefits. Five proposals are made for taking matters forward. These include undertaking more pilot studies, insisting on a minimum data set to justify spending plans and increasing the incentives for intersectoral collaboration.

References (40)

  • T. McKeown
  • J. House et al.

    Social relationships and health

    Science

    (1988)
  • V. Fuchs

    The Health Economy

  • R. Labonte

    Health care spending as a risk to health

    Canadian Journal of Public Health

    (1990)
  • J.B. McKinlay

    Health promotion through healthy public policy: the contribution of complementary research methods

    Canadian Journal of Public Health

    (1992)
  • J.C. Hurowitz

    Toward a social policy for health

    New England Journal of Medicine

    (1993)
  • Premier's Council on Health Strategy
  • E.J. Mishan

    Cost-benefit Analysis

    (1988)
  • U.E. Reinhardt

    Reflections on the meaning of efficiency: can efficiency be separated from equity?

    Yale Law and Policy Review

    (1992)
  • A.K. Dasgupta et al.
  • Cited by (27)

    • Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds in Global Health: Taking a Multisectoral Perspective

      2017, Value in Health
      Citation Excerpt :

      This conventional approach that underpins many health economic evaluations often focuses on a single-sectoral payer that seeks to maximize health, typically through interventions delivered by the health care system. This approach risks missing two critical issues: first, multiple “sectors” contribute to the production of health, and second, some of the goods and services produced by the “health sector,” or the healthcare system, have multiple benefits besides health [16,17]. There is a solid and growing body of evidence on the social determinants of health, which include poverty, education, gender inequity, housing, and transport, among many others [18–21].

    • A prospective mini health impact assessment of the 'Towards 2010' programme in Sandwell and West Birmingham in the West Midlands

      2007, Public Health
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, options C and D appear to offer the maximum opportunity for a whole system change and a potential to link into the wider regeneration initiatives. The development of new healthcare facilities can improve health through the provision of improved services, job opportunities and economic activity.15 However, impact assessments can prove vital to evade the consequences of environmental degradation, poverty exacerbation and social disruption.16

    • Public health: Some economic perspectives

      2020, Economics and Australian Health Policy
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text