Monitoring recruitment effectiveness and cost in a clinical trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(93)90024-8Get rights and content

Abstract

Recruitment effort and costs in clinical trials are very often underestimated. As funding constraints increase, more precise estimates of costs as well as methods to monitor effectiveness are needed. However, few studies exist that report recruitement cost effectiveness and costs. The study reported here was developed in Potrland, Oregon as an ancillary study to the Lung Health Study. The authors developed a monitoring and evaluation system to track response rates and costs associated with each of five recruitment methods. These methods include (1) media (TV, radio, newspapers), (2) neighborhood promotion, (3) direct mail, (4) worksite promotion, and (5) referral by other study participants. The analysis is limited to a 6-month period (April 1–September 30, 1987) or the middle phase of recruitment. During the study period, 46% were recruited from media, 30% from neighborhood promotion, 1.5% from direct mail, 11% from worksites, and 12% from referrals. Neighborhood promotion and direct mail were least cost-effective, media most cost-effective, with worksite and referral moderately cost-effective. The cost-effectiveness of media promotion is explained in part by the limited number of media sources in Portland, making it possible to reach a large audience with less effort, as well as the ability to provide rapid feedback to media sources. We conclude that the effectiveness of recruitment in a clinical trial is maximized by using multiple overlapping recruitment strategies coupled with a monitoring system that can provide rapid feedback regarding the effectiveness and cost of each strategy.

References (23)

  • WS Agras et al.

    Participant recruitment to the Coronary Primary Prevention Trial

    J Chron Dis

    (1983)
  • Cited by (65)

    • Rapid qualitative research

      2022, International Encyclopedia of Education: Fourth Edition
    • Systematic review on costs and resource use of randomized clinical trials shows a lack of transparent and comprehensive data

      2018, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Two studies published in the 1990s assessed site-specific resources and costs [31,33]. A total of 30 articles [34–63] described the costs of recruitment for an RCT (Table 3). Print advertisement (described in 14 articles), mail-based invitation (11 articles), and radio advertisement (six articles) were the most commonly assessed recruitment methods.

    • Concept and implementation of a study dashboard module for a continuous monitoring of trial recruitment and documentation

      2016, Journal of Biomedical Informatics
      Citation Excerpt :

      A ‘comprehensive data-monitoring process with the capability of rapid feedback’ has been advised that should allow for ‘considering alternative strategies if recruitment is lagging’ [6]. We would therefore expect the utility of monitoring accrual to be pronounced if diverse recruitment methods are available, in particular if their efficiency is disparate or unclear [4,8,9,59,60]. The insight that ‘unanticipated difficulties are highly likely at some time’ generally calls for a ‘proactive approach to monitoring ongoing trials’ [3].

    • Fractional Brownian motion and long term clinical trial recruitment

      2011, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported by contract no. 1-HR-46016 from the Division of Lung Diseases, National Heart, Lung and Bloom Institute.

    1

    Address reprint requests to: Wendy M. Bjornson-Benson, MPH, Mail Code L334A, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR 97201.

    View full text