Technical innovation and note
Preoperative radiotherapy in rectal carcinoma—Aspects of acute adverse effects and radiation technique

https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(96)00229-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose: To explain a possible association between treatment technique and postoperative mortality adter preoperative radiotherapy of rectal carcinoma, the dose distributions were compared in model experiments.

Methods and Materials: Preoperative radiotherapy with a three-beam technique delivered in five fractions to 25 effects of this treatment, both acute and late, have been low. In a parallel trial using an identical fractionation schedule and total dose but with a two-beam technique, the postoperative mortality was higher. Two-, three-, and four-beam techniques were analyzed in 20 patients with computed tomography based, three-dimensional dose planning. Dose distributions and dose-volume histograms in the planning target volume (PTV) and in the organs at risk were considered. A numerical “biological” model was used to compare the techniques.

Results: The two-beam and the four-beam box techniques give the most homogeneous distributions in the PTV, although all techniques results in dose distributions that would be considered adequate, provided 16 MV or higher photon energies are used. Three- and four-beam techniques show advantages over the two-beam technique with respect to organs at risk, particularly the small bowel. With the two-beam technique and the upper beam limit at mid-L4, the volume of the bowel that receives >95% of the prescribed dose, and hence, is included in the treated volume (TV), is more twice as large as that with three- and four-beam techniques, and that of the total body between 1.5 and 2 times as large. The results of the analyses using the biological model indicate that the three- and four-beam techniques result in less small bowel complication rates than the two-bowel technique. The integral energy to the total body is similar for all treatment modalities compared.

Conclusions: The volume of bowel included in the TV, rather than the energy imparted to the body, influences postoperative mortality, and emphasizes the importance of precise radiotherapy planing to minimize normal tissue toxicity.

References (40)

  • J.T. Lyman et al.

    Optimization of radiation therapy III: A method of assessing complication probabilities from dose-volume histograms

    Int. J. Radiol. Oncol. Biol. Phys.

    (1987)
  • A.C. Mak et al.

    Late complications of postoperative radiation therapy for cancer of the rectum and rectosigmoid

    Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.

    (1994)
  • A. Niemierko et al.

    Calculation of normal complication probability and dose-volume histogram reduction schemes for tissues with critical element architecture

    Radiother. Oncol.

    (1991)
  • B. Shank et al.

    Three-dimensional treatment planning for postoperative treatment of rectal carcinoma

    Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.

    (1991)
  • D.M. Tait et al.

    Conformal radiotherapy of the pelvis: Assessment of acute toxicity

    Radiother. Oncol.

    (1993)
  • P. Thomas et al.

    Perineal effects of postoperative treatment for adenocarcinoma of the rectum

    Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.

    (1986)
  • A.J. van der Kogel

    Radiobiological and clinical data on dose/volume effect relationships in normal tissues

    Radiother. Oncol.

    (1993)
  • L. Balslev et al.

    Postoperative radiotherapy in Dukes' B and C carcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid. A randomized multicenter study

    Cancer

    (1986)
  • W. Duncan

    Adjuvant radiotherapy in rectal cancer: The MRC trials

    Br. J. Surg.

    (1985)
  • J.F. Fowler

    The linear-quadratic formula and progress in fractionated radiotherapy

    Br. J. Radiol.

    (1989)
  • Cited by (80)

    • Late effects of pelvic radiation for rectal cancer and implications for survivorship

      2014, Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the Stockholm II trial, the superior border was lowered to the middle of L4. Analysis of the Stockholm trials revealed that adverse effects of radiotherapy were increased with higher radiation dose and larger volume of normal tissue within the irradiated volume.12 Indeed, with a two-beam technique compared to a three- or four-beam technique with the superior border at mid L4, the volume of the bowel that receives >95% of the prescription dose and is included in the treatment volume is more than twice as large.

    • Preoperative endorectal brachytherapy in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: Rethinking neoadjuvant treatment

      2014, Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      This is of particular concern in patients with a low risk of local recurrence when treated with surgery alone. Adverse effects of irradiation depend on the radiation dose and the irradiated volumes.21 Acute toxicity in rectal cancer treatment has been well described and primarily consists of wound healing, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and neurologic complaints.21–24

    • Current Controversies in Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation of Rectal Cancer

      2014, Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America
    • Evaluation of three different CT simulation and planning procedures for the preoperative irradiation of operable rectal cancer

      2008, Radiotherapy and Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the later period (more than 1 year after surgery) no difference in non-rectal cancer mortality was seen between patients treated with pre-operative radiotherapy and those treated with surgery alone. Early side effects are limited to neuropathies and wound healing problems [6,11]. Late complications seen after the 5 × 5 Gy scheme mainly consist of large bowel problems, impaired sexual function and secondary cancers in the vicinity of the radiation fields [1,2,10,14].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text