Anthropometric assessment of nutritional status in newborn infants. Discriminative value of mid arm circumference and of skinfold thickness

https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3782(85)90104-5Get rights and content

Abstract

74 appropriate-for-gestational age (AGA) and 22 small-for-gestational age (SGA) caucasian infants were studied for anthropometric parameters: mid arm circumference (MAC), triceps and subscapular skinfold thickness (TSKF and SSKF) recorded at 15 and 60 s, chest circumference (cc), head circumference, birth weight and length.

MAC is highly correlated with birth weight either in AGA (r = 0.936; P < 0.001) or in SGA infants (r = 0.860; P < 0.001). MAC is also correlated with gestational age in AGA (r = 0.850; P < 0.001) and SGA infants (r = 0.76; P < 0.001). Similar correlations were found between TSKF, SSKF and birth weight or gestational age. Arm muscle and fat areas are also positively correlated with birth weight and gestational age, in AGA and SGA infants.

A multiple regression analysis of our data allowed a classification of the best discriminant anthropometric parameters between AGA and SGA infants. MAC, SSKF15, SSKF60 and chest circumference were selected. An equation was established in AGA infants with these four parameters giving a predictive gestational age: gestational age (weeks) = 1.216 MAC (cm)−3.588 SSKF15 (mm)+0.263 CC (cm) + 17.9.

The ratio of predicted gestational age to the real gestational age was 1.0 ± 0.044 in AGA versus 0.896 ± 0.034 in SGA infants.

Our data suggest that MAC and SSKF provide a simple measure of body composition of neonates and a useful tool for determining the degree of maturity of a newborn independent of birth weight.

References (27)

  • Y.W. Brans et al.

    A non invasive approach of body composition in the neonate: dynamic skinfold measurements

    Pediatr. Res.

    (1974)
  • O.G. Brook et al.

    Size at birth from 37–41 weeks gestation: ethnic standards for British infants of both sexes

    J. Hum. Nutr.

    (1981)
  • S. Bustamente et al.

    Body weight, static and dynamic skinfold thickness in small premature infants during first month of life

    Pediatr. Res.

    (1982)
  • Cited by (30)

    • Consensus Based Definition of Growth Restriction in the Newborn

      2018, Journal of Pediatrics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, an accurate definition of growth restriction in the newborn is relevant both for clinical and scientific purposes. Variables other than birth weight and size measurements have been reported in previous studies to aid distinction between SGA and growth restriction in the newborn, including: signs of malnutrition of the newborn by skinfold measurements; pregnancy information, such as hypertension or pre-eclampsia; diagnosis of fetal growth restriction during pregnancy; and serum markers that indicate poor nutritional status during pregnancy.14-16 Many of these variables have not been implemented in practice for defining growth restriction, largely for reasons of applicability and costs.

    • State of the science in measurement of infant size at birth

      2002, Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews
    • The skinfold thickness in preterm infants

      1993, Early Human Development
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text