Original articleSelecting a patient characteristics index for the prediction of medical outcomes using administrative claims data
References (18)
- et al.
Relating patient characteristics at the time of admission to outcomes of hospitalization
J Clin Epidemiol
(1991) - et al.
Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives
J Clin Epidemiol
(1993) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: a response
J Clin Epidemiol
(1993)Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: a response
J Clin Eidemiol
(1993)- et al.
Further evidence concerning the use of a clinical comorbidity index with ICD-9-CM administrative data
J Clin Epidemiol
(1993) - et al.
Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases
J Clin Epidemiol
(1992) - et al.
A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation
J Chron Dis
(1987) - et al.
Comparison of severity of illness indicators in an intensive care unit
Arch Intern Med
(1991) - et al.
Diagnosis related group “all payor” hospital payment and medical diseases
Arch Intern Med
(1989)
Cited by (121)
Association between handgrip strength asymmetry and falls in elderly Koreans: A nationwide population-based cross-sectional study
2021, Archives of Gerontology and GeriatricsEffect of comorbidity on injury outcomes: a review of existing indices
2019, Annals of EpidemiologyThe impact of operative time and hypothermia in acute burn surgery
2017, BurnsCitation Excerpt :Patients excluded from analysis were those admitted for reconstructive surgery, conditions other than burn injury, or if only part of their acute burn management was undertaken at the centre, and those for whom documentation was either absent or incomplete. Demographic data collected included sex, age, total body surface area, presence of inhalation injury, substance abuse (alcohol, cigarette, and other recreational drug use), comorbidities [18], operative details, and post-operative complications. Operative length was defined a priori as the total duration in the operating room (from time of entry to exit).
Evaluation of three co-morbidity measures to predict mortality in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty
2016, Osteoarthritis and CartilageCitation Excerpt :However, in total joint arthroplasty patients there is no consensus as to which co-morbidity measure is the best in regards to mortality prediction. In a sample of almost 250,000 US Medicare surgical patients between 1985 and 1989, Melfi et al. reported that the unweighted co-morbidity score at the time of surgery was the best performer (c = 0.82) in predicting short term death in comparison to the Charlson weighted score (c = 0.65), which performed very poorly in comparison to the other measures (c = 0.65–0.82)48. More recently, when Mnatzaganian et al. evaluated some of these measures in a smaller cohort of 819 Australian men, they reported that the Charlson weighted score (c = 0.88) performed better in the 1 year mortality prediction than the Elixhauser conditions (c = 0.86), but similarly to our results the differences were small between the co-morbidity measures (c = 0.76–0.88)46.
Effect of Minor Liver Function Test Abnormalities and Values Within the Normal Range on Survival in Heart Failure
2015, American Journal of CardiologyCitation Excerpt :Only the first complete set of LFTs was used for the present analysis. Co-morbid conditions were defined using the ICD-9 diagnostic coding for the Charlson co-morbidity criteria.12 Additional co-morbidities were defined as follows: hypertension (ICD-9 401 to 405) and ischemic heart disease (ICD-9 410 to 414).
A systematic review identifies valid comorbidity indices derived from administrative health data
2015, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology