Original article
Impact of referral bias on clinical and epidemiological studies of Alzheimer's disease

https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(95)00031-3Get rights and content

Abstract

We used the resources of the Rochester Epidemiology Project to compare sociodemographic and clinical characteristics in three groups of Alzheimer's disease patients. The first group included incidence cases occurring among residents of Rochester, Minnesota (population-based series; n = 241). The second group was a sample of patients referred to the Mayo Clinic from the remainder of Minnesota and the four surrounding states (n = 58); the third was a sample referred from the remainder of the United States (n = 94). Patients from Rochester were more frequently women, less highly educated, less commonly white collar workers, more frequently institutionalized, less frequently married, and more often lived alone than those in the two referral groups. Patients from Rochester also had a more advanced age of onset of dementia. For occupation, education, and living arrangement, the differences across groups increased with increasing distance of referral. Clinical and epidemiological studies based on patients referred from primary to secondary or tertiary care centers may suffer from severe selection bias.

References (23)

  • G McKhann et al.

    Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: Report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease

    Neurology

    (1984)
  • Cited by (91)

    • Neuropsychological comparison of incident MCI and prevalent MCI

      2018, Alzheimer's and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring
    • Phenotypes and body mass in women with polycystic ovary syndrome identified in referral versus unselected populations: systematic review and meta-analysis

      2016, Fertility and Sterility
      Citation Excerpt :

      Berkson's bias, a form of selection bias, was first described in 1946 and questioned the validity of epidemiological studies performed in medical settings (60). Extensive evidence demonstrates that patients with Alzheimer's disease, cancer, and surgical conditions identified in clinical facilities are not necessarily representative of the same diagnoses in the general population (61–63). Cases identified in clinical settings tend to have a more severe manifestation of the disease and differ from the general population in socioeconomic variables.

    • Dementia severity and the longitudinal costs of informal care in the Cache County population

      2015, Alzheimer's and Dementia
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, The Predictors Study drew dementia patients from academic clinical centers, whereas the French study drew dementia patients from a randomized clinical trial. Neither study's population is representative of typical community-dwelling dementia patients and their caregivers, for example, there is greater likelihood of individuals from clinic samples to be married and of higher socioeconomic status than persons drawn from the general community [11]. Recently Hurd et al. [5] estimated that the yearly cost of care attributable to dementia ranged from $41,689 to $56,689 (in 2010 dollars) depending on the method used to estimate informal caregiving costs.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This study was supported in part by research grants NS17750, AG06786, and AG08031 from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

    View full text