Regular article
Pharmacokinetic dosing of aminoglycosides: a controlled trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9343(02)01476-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate whether individualized pharmacokinetic dosing of aminoglycosides can reduce nephrotoxicity and improve the outcome of patients with gram-negative sepsis.

Methods

We conducted a prospective controlled trial at a tertiary care university hospital. Eighty-one patients with suspected or documented gram-negative infections were enrolled. All were treated with either gentamicin or amikacin, according to clinical judgement. Patients were allocated to one of two groups based on the last digit (odd/even) of their identification number. In the study group (pharmacokinetic dosing) of 43 patients, plasma aminoglycoside levels were determined 1 hour after initiation of drug infusion and 8 to 16 hours later to estimate the elimination half-life and volume of distribution, from which the subsequent dosage schedule was calculated. Target peak plasma levels were 20 μg/mL for gentamicin and 60 μg/mL for amikacin. Target trough levels were <1 μg/mL for both drugs. The control group (fixed once-daily dosing) consisted of 38 patients who were prescribed single daily doses of gentamicin or amikacin. The primary endpoints were renal toxicity (≥25% increase in serum creatinine level or a serum creatinine level ≥1.4 mg/dL) and 28-day mortality.

Results

The two study groups were similar in age, sex, indications for therapy, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, and clinical assessment at baseline. Although the pharmacokinetic group received significantly greater doses of aminoglycosides than did the once-daily group, the incidence of nephrotoxicity was significantly lower in the pharmacokinetic group (5% [2/43] vs. 21% [8/38], P = 0.03). There was no statistically significant difference in 28-day mortality (27% [12/43] vs. 22% [8/38], P = 0.3).

Conclusion

These results suggest that individualized pharmacokinetic dosing of aminoglycosides reduces the incidence of nephrotoxicity and allows the use of greater doses of aminoglycosides.

Section snippets

Patients

Nonsurgical patients aged ≥18 years who were hospitalized at the Soroka University Medical Center with suspected or documented gram-negative sepsis were included if the house staff decided to prescribe gentamicin (Garamycin; Teva, Jerusalem, Israel) or amikacin (Amikin; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Anagni, Italy). A diagnosis of suspected gram-negative sepsis was made on the basis of conventional sepsis criteria and a clinical picture of infection (23). We excluded patients with allergy or

Results

Eighty-one patients were enrolled between November 1999 and May 2000. Two patients declined to participate. There were 38 patients in the fixed once-daily dose group and 43 in the pharmacokinetic group. The baseline characteristics of the patients in the two groups were generally similar (Table 1). Fifty-one patients (63%) were treated with gentamicin, and 30 patients (37%) were treated with amikacin. The most common indication for treatment was continued fever despite treatment with another

Discussion

Pharmacokinetic dosing of aminoglycosides is based on sound microbiologic and pharmacologic rationale. Our results indicate that it is also a safe regimen, leading to a significantly reduced incidence of nephrotoxicity of only 5%. A similar reduction in nephrotoxicity to 5% was also observed in a study of pharmacokinetic monitoring in patients in a surgical intensive care unit (13).

Several studies have shown the utility of monitoring peak and trough aminoglycoside levels in enhancing efficacy

References (24)

  • J.M. Prins et al.

    Once versus thrice daily gentamicin in patients with serious infections

    Lancet

    (1993)
  • T. Dorman et al.

    Impact of altered aminoglycoside volume of distribution on the adequacy of three milligram per kilogram loading dose. Critical Care Research Group

    Surgery

    (1998)
  • A.M. MacConnachie

    Gentamicin once a day

    Intens Crit Care Nurs

    (1996)
  • S.L. Barriere

    Bacterial resistance to beta-lactams, and its prevention with combination therapy

    Pharmacotherapy

    (1992)
  • C.I. Miyagawa

    Aminoglycosides in the intensive care unit: an old drug in a dynamic environment

    New Horizons

    (1993)
  • G.H. Hottendorf et al.

    Aminoglycoside nephrotoxicity

    Toxicol Pathol

    (1986)
  • C.D. Freeman et al.

    Once-daily dosing of aminoglycosidesreview and recommendations for clinical practice

    J Antimicrob Chemother

    (1997)
  • W.R. Summer et al.

    Initial aminoglycoside levels in the critically ill

    Crit Care Med

    (1983)
  • R.D. Moore et al.

    Clinical response to aminoglycoside therapy: importance of the ratio of peak concentration to minimal inhibitory concentration

    J Infect Dis

    (1987)
  • G.G. Jackson et al.

    The inducive role of ionic binding in the bactericidal and postexposure effects of aminoglycoside antibiotics with implications for dosing

    J Infect Dis

    (1990)
  • G.L. Daikos et al.

    First exposure adaptive resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics in vivo with meaning for optimal use

    Antimicrob Agents Chemother

    (1991)
  • M. Averbuch et al.

    Gentamicin once-daily levels: ordered too soon and too often

    Hosp Formul

    (1989)
  • Cited by (129)

    • Therapeutic drug monitoring of Amikacin in hospitalized patients: A pilot study

      2023, Medical Journal Armed Forces India
      Citation Excerpt :

      Cmin levels of Amikacin are indicators of toxicity. Exact safe Cmin level may vary from patient to patient, Cmin of <2 mcg/mL are generally considered to be safe and levels above 5 mcg/mL are known to herald toxicity.9,18 A recent meta-analysis demonstrated that Amikacin trough levels <10 mcg/mL may reduce the risk of nephrotoxicity.24

    • Interest of therapeutic drug monitoring of aminoglycosides administered by a monodose regimen

      2019, Nephrologie et Therapeutique
      Citation Excerpt :

      Interestingly, we showed, based on ROC analysis, that patients with a CLcr ≤ 41.66 mL/min have a 11.29-folder risk to have a toxic Cmin than patients having a Clcr > 41.66 mL/min. This finding is consistent with previous reports, which demonstrated that high Cmin values were closely related to a decrease in creatinine clearance rate [19–22]. For example, Plager et al. reported that gentamicin target Cmin was achieved in 0%, 15%, 61% and 97%, in patients having a Clcr < 20 mL/min, between 20–39 mL/min, between 40–59 mL/min, and > 60 mL/min, respectively [20].

    • Aminoglycoside-Induced Nephrotoxicity

      2018, Comprehensive Toxicology: Third Edition
    • Antimicrobial Stewardship Approaches in the Intensive Care Unit

      2017, Infectious Disease Clinics of North America
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text