Health status in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and in general population and disease comparison groups**

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9343(96)00174-XGet rights and content

purpose

To measure the functional status and well-being of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), and compare them with those of a general population group and six disease comparison groups.

patients and methods

The subjects of the study were patients with CFS (n = 223) from a CFS clinic, a population-based control sample (n = 2,474), and disease comparison groups with hypertension (n = 2,089), congestive heart failure (n = 216), type II diabetes mellitus (n = 163), acute myocardial infarction (n = 107), multiple sclerosis (n = 25), and depression (n = 502). We measured functional status and wellbeing using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), which is a self-administered questionnaire in which lower scores are indicative of greater impairment. results: Patients with CFS had far lower mean scores than the general population control subjects on all eight SF-36 scales. They also scored significantly lower than patients in all the disease comparison groups other than depression on virtually all the scales. When compared with patients with depression, they scored significantly lower on all the scales except for scales measuring mental health and role disability due to emotional problems, on which they scored significantly higher. The two SF-36 scales reflecting mental health were not correlated with any of the symptoms of CFS except for irritability and depression.

conclusion

Patients with CFS had marked impairment, in comparison with the general population and disease comparison groups. Moreover, the degree and pattern of impairment was different from that seen in patients with depression.

References (54)

  • BuchwaldD et al.

    A chronic illness characterized by fatigue, neurologic and immunologic disorders, and active human herpesvirus type 6 infection

    Ann Intern Med.

    (1992)
  • KomaroffAL et al.

    The chronic fatigue syndrome

    Ann Intern Med.

    (1989)
  • WareNC

    Society, mind and body in chronic fatigue syndrome: an anthropological view

  • WareJE et al.

    The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection

    Med Care.

    (1992)
  • McHorneyCA et al.

    Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 Health Survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey

    Med Care.

    (1994)
  • WareJE et al.
  • WareJE et al.

    Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of the SF-36 health profile and summary measures: results from the Medical Outcomes Study

    Med Care

    (1995)
  • SchluederbergA et al.

    Chronic fatigue syndrome research: definition and medical outcome assessment

    Ann Intern Med.

    (1992)
  • RobinsLN et al.
  • McHorneyCA et al.

    The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs

    Med Care

    (1993)
  • McHorneyCA et al.

    The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups

    Med Care

    (1994)
  • McHorneyCA et al.

    The validity and relative precision of MOS Short-and Long-Form Health Status Scales and Dartmouth COOP charts: results from the Medical Outcomes Study

    Med Care

    (1992)
  • Medical Outcomes Trust

    How to Score the SF-36 Health Survey

    (1993)
  • WareJE et al.

    The SF-36 Health Survey: development and use in mental health research and the IQOLA Project

    Int J Ment Health.

    (1994)
  • ArmitageP et al.
  • TukeyJW

    Some thoughts on clinical trials, especially problems of multiplicity

    Science

    (1977)
  • NunnallyJC

    Psychometric Theory

    (1978)
  • Cited by (0)

    **

    Support for this research was provided by grants RO1 A127314 and UO1 A132246 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, and by a gift from the S. Sydney DeYoung Foundation.

    View full text