Evolution of the protists and protistan parasites from the perspective of molecular systematics

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(97)00181-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Unlike prokaryotes, the Protista are rich in morphological and ultrastructure information. Their amazing phenotypic diversity permits assignment of many protists to cohesive phyletic assemblages but sometimes blurs relationships between major lineages. With the advent of molecular techniques, it became possible to test evolutionary hypotheses that were originally formulated according to shared phenotypic traits. More than any other gene family, studies of rRNAs changed our understanding of protist evolution. Stramenopiles (oomycetes, chrysophytes, phaeophytes, synurophytes, diatoms, xanthophytes, bicosoecids, slime nets) and alveolates (dinoflagellates, apicomplexans, ciliates) are two novel, complex evolutionary assemblages which diverged nearly simultaneously with animals, fungi, plants, rhodophytes, haptophytes and a myriad of independent amoeboid lineages. Their separation may have occurred one billion years ago and collectively these lineages make up the “crown” of the eukaryotic tree. Deeper branches in the eukaryotic tree show 16S-like rRNA sequence variation that is much greater than that observed within the Archaea and the Bacteria. A progression of independent protist branches, some as ancient as the divergence between the two prokaryotic domains, preceded the sudden radiation of “crown” groups. Trichomonads, diplomonads and Microsporidia are basal to all other eukaryotes included in rRNA studies. Together with pelobionts, oxymonads, retortamonads and hypermastigids, these amitochondriate taxa comprise the Archaezoa. This skeletal phylogeny suggested that early branching eukaryotes lacked mitochondria, peroxisomes and typical stacked Golgi dictyosomes. However, recent studies of heat shock proteins indicate that the first eukaryotes may have had mitochondria. When evaluated in terms of evolution of ultrastructure, lifestyles and other phenotypic traits, the rRNA phylogenies provide the most consistent of molecular trees. They permit identification of the phylogenetic affinity of many parasitic groups as well as a means to integrate molecular and cell biological information from diverse eukaryotes. We must place greater emphasis upon improved phylogenetic inference techniques and investigations of genomic diversity in protists.

References (51)

  • RH Whittaker

    New concepts of kingdoms of organisms

    Science

    (1969)
  • F Sanger et al.

    DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors

  • J Felsenstein

    Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach

    J Mol Evol

    (1981)
  • G Olsen et al.

    Fast DNA ml: a tool for construction of phylogenetic trees of DNA sequences using Maximum Likelihood

    Cabios

    (1994)
  • DL Swofford et al.

    Phylogeny reconstruction

  • D Bhattacharya et al.

    Molecular phylogenetic analysis of actin genic regions from Achlya bisexualis (Oomycota) and Costaria costata (Chromophyta)

    J Mol Evol

    (1991)
  • SL Baldauf et al.

    Animals and fungi are each other's closest relatives: congruent evidence from multiple proteins

  • CR Woese et al.

    Phylogenetic structure of the procaryotic domain: the primary kingdoms

  • B Pace et al.

    Homology of ribosomal ribonucleic acid of diverse bacterial species with Escherichia coli and Bacillus stearothermophilus

    J Bacteriol

    (1971)
  • R McCarroll et al.

    Nucleotide sequence of Dictyostelium discoideum small subunit ribosomal ribonucleic acid inferred from the gene sequence: evolutionary implications

    Biochemistry

    (1983)
  • DJ Patterson

    Stramenopiles: chromophytes from a protistan perspective

  • ML Sogin et al.

    Problems with molecular diversity in the Eucarya

  • EV Ariztia et al.

    A new phylogeny for chromophyte algae using 16S-like RRNA sequences from Mallomonas papillosa (Synurophyceae) and Tribonema aequale (Xanthophyceae)

    J Phycol

    (1991)
  • JH Gunderson et al.

    Phylogenetic relationships between chlorophytes, chrysophytes and oomycetes

  • DD Leipe et al.

    The stramenopiles from a molecular perspective: 16S-like rRNA sequences from Labyrinthuloides minuta and Cafeteria roenbergensis

    Phycologia

    (1994)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text