Journal of Molecular Biology
CommunicationPeriodic Epi-organization of the Yeast Genome Revealed by the Distribution of Promoter Sites
Introduction
Several specialized regions have been discovered within the eukaryotic nucleus, including discrete chomosome territories, peripheral telomeres, and the association of replication- and transcription-active chromosomal sites into foci. The best-characterized nuclear compartment and the only one that has a clearly identified function is the nucleolus. Nucleoli bring together many chromosomes carrying rRNA encoding genes and organize them into a transcriptionally-efficient organelle that also processes and assembles ribosomal components.1., 2., 3. Other, less well-characterized nuclear compartments such as Cajal bodies, speckles, gems and promyelocytic leukemia bodies are engaged in various aspects of acid nucleic metabolism in metazoans (reviewed in Ref. 4). These long-lived compartments are essentially dynamic structures composed of mobile elements.5., 6. Recent studies of chromatin structure have revealed that chromosomes are compartmentalized into discrete territories and it has been suggested that gene positioning in a territory or an interchromatin compartment influences its regulation.7 RNA polymerase II, the enzyme responsible for transcribing protein-coding genes, is found with its associated factors and transcripts in several thousand nuclear foci with diameters 40–80 nm, that together occupy <0.5% nuclear volume, much less than that of active chromatin.8 Each focus, sometimes called a “transcription factory”, typically contains tens of enzymes and transcripts.8., 9.
Some regional specialization is also apparent in the much smaller yeast nucleus. In yeast, centromeres cluster near one pole of the interphasic nucleus in a microtubule-dependent fashion, while chromosome arms extend outwards from this pole, and the nucleolus is opposite to this pole.10 The nuclear periphery harbors spatially confined telomeric domains that are actively involved in transcriptional silencing11 (reviewed in Refs 12., 13.). Additional evidence supports an interrelationship between nuclear architecture and transcriptional activity. For instance, silencing defects14 or transcriptional response to mating pheromone15 were found to induce alterations of the nuclear morphology. Actively transcribed tRNA genes repress adjacent protein-encoding genes, probably through a subnuclear localization effect.16
Eukaryotes share a conserved mechanism of transcriptional regulation.17 RNA polymerase II and the general transcription factors assemble in a regulated fashion. However, the predominant level of control involves dedicated transcription factors, or “regulators”, that bind to short DNA sequence motifs in the cis-regulatory region of a protein-encoding gene and activate or repress its transcription. The transcription of many genes is cooperatively regulated via one or several regulators.17 Multivalent regulators bind to closely spaced sites in the regulatory region of a gene and this close spacing is in part responsible for increasing the local concentration of the regulators such that binding to one site facilitates binding to a second site.18 Similarly, DNA can be used as a scaffold to build unique nucleoprotein complexes that can establish long-range interactions with similarly unique complexes.18., 19.
Here, I analyse the transcriptional organization of the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and reveal a remarkable periodicity. This periodicity can be parsimoniously explained by invoking a role for local concentrations and transcriptional dynamics in the optimization of nuclear functions via the generation of spatial chromosomal patterns. It suggests a functional architecture of the nucleus in which coregulated genes tend to colocalize in 3D.
Section snippets
Periodicity of coregulated gene positions
Rap1p is the dedicated regulator in yeast whose gene targets are most numerous and most expressed.20 This was determined by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) which measures in vivo occupancy of DNA sites by a chosen protein, using DNA/protein crosslinking. Regularities were sought in the distances between pairs of Rap1p targets from the same chromosome. The distribution of such distances has a peak for the shortest distances (Figure 1(a), top). This indicates that coregulated genes tend to
Diversity of chromosome arms
Table 1 shows that the spacing of coregulated genes vary between the chromosome arms. These periods were separately determined as in Figure 1(b) for each of the 32 yeast chromosome arms, corresponding to rows in Table 1. They were independently determined from three datasets,20., 23., 26., 27. corresponding to the three last columns of Table 1. The first set comprises 124 regulators studied by classical genetic and biochemical means,27 the other sets comprise 320., 26. and 10623 regulators
Periodicity of replication origins
To test whether this distinctive organization pervades other aspects of DNA metabolism, replication origins, termed autonomously replicating sequences (ARS), were analysed in a similar fashion, using recent ChIP mapping data.28 The ARS of yeast chromosome IX tend to be spaced by 31 kbp or multiples thereof (Figure 1(c), top), like coregulated genes, albeit with a 15.5 kbp shift of the peaks after distance 124 kbp. Regularities are not observed when gene positions are attributed at random (Figure
Coregulation or colocalization
In ChIP experiments, DNA/regulator crosslinking is solely based on spatial proximity. In view of the above results, a “backwards” interpretation of the ChIP data could be that genes are generally crosslinked to a regulator, not because they are its targets, but because they colocalize with a true target due to some unidentified long-range structure. If the backwards interpretation were correct, assessment of the crosslinking data with decreasing stringency should produce increasingly long lists
Full-genome transcriptional scheme
The function served by the regular spacing of coregulated genes should not be restricted to intra-chromosomal use, as chromosomes appear as rather arbitrary boundaries to gene distribution when close species are compared. However, any inter-chromosomal regularity would imply enormous topological constraints, since each chromosome arm is already constrained to a different period which holds for most, if not all, regulators (Table 1). The periodicity of target positions suggests to represent a
Molecular and evolutionary basis
Spatial confinement of target genes synergistically increases the local concentration of their multimeric regulator just where it is required. It thus favors binding at specific DNA consensus sites through elevated local concentration, thereby sequestering the regulator away from spurious DNA binding sites. One way to achieve this local concentration effect is to cluster target genes linearly along the chromosome. Contiguity indeed occurs in yeast coregulated genes (Figure 1).21., 22. However,
Conclusion
The concept of a genome-level transcriptional scheme readily explains the specificity, responsiveness and versatility of transcriptional and replicational regulations, despite the overwhelming abundance of unused protein binding motifs.20., 25., 28., 29. It suggests a guideline for discriminating genuine protein binding sites among those detected through sequence analysis or ChIP. This concept also accounts for the optimization of gene control by several regulators, despite combinatorial
Supplementary Files
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to Vic Norris, Benno Müller-Hill and Eric H. Davidson for critically reading this paper. Supported by funding from CNRS, genopole® and Conseil Régional d'Ile-de-France.
References (34)
Nuclear bodies: multifaceted subdomains of the interchromatin space
Trends Cell Biol.
(1999)- et al.
Review: dynamic stability of the interphase nucleus in health and disease
J. Struct. Biol.
(2000) - et al.
Nuclear compartments and gene regulation
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
(1999) - et al.
Genome-wide nuclear morphology screen identifies novel genes involved in nuclear architecture and gene-silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
J. Mol. Biol.
(2002) - et al.
MAP kinase signaling induces nuclear reorganization in budding yeast
Curr. Biol.
(2000) - et al.
Serial regulation of transcriptional regulators in the yeast cell cycle
Cell
(2001) - et al.
Chromosomal boundaries in S. cerevisiae
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
(2001) - et al.
Site of transcription of ribosomal RNA and intranucleolar structure in HeLa cells
J. Cell Sci.
(1994) - et al.
Emerging concepts of nucleolar assembly
J. Cell Sci.
(2002) - et al.
Assembly and functional organization of the nucleolus: ultrastructural analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants
Mol. Biol. Cell
(2000)
High mobility of proteins in the mammalian cell nucleus
Nature
Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells
Nature Rev. Genet.
Numbers and organization of RNA polymerases, nascent transcripts, and transcription units in HeLa nuclei
Mol. Biol. Cell
Bridging the resolution gap: imaging the same transcription factories in cryosections by light and electron microscopy
J. Histochem. Cytochem.
Centromere clustering is a major determinant of yeast interphase nuclear organization
J. Cell Sci.
Nuclear architecture and spatial positioning help establish transcriptional states of telomeres in yeast
Nature Cell Biol.
Telomere transitions in yeast: the end of the chromosome as we know it
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
Cited by (33)
The layout of a bacterial genome
2012, FEBS LettersCitation Excerpt :On the one hand, chromosomal proximity has been found to be effectively limited to 20 successive genes in enterobacteria [70]. On the other hand, periodic positioning has been observed for microbial genes that are either co-regulated [71–73], co-expressed [74], evolutionarily correlated [75,70], or highly codon-biased [76]. Képès has postulated the existence of a positive feedback loop connecting periodic genome layout to the cellular conformation of chromosomes onto transcriptional control [71].
Synthetic and integrative biology
2011, Comptes Rendus ChimieCo-expressed Yeast Genes Cluster Over a Long Range but are not Regularly Spaced
2006, Journal of Molecular BiologyA thermodynamic model for the agglomeration of DNA-looping proteins
2008, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment