Continuity of pediatrician: New support for an old shibboleth**
References (24)
- et al.
Predicting mothers' compliance with pediatric medical regimens
J. Pediatr.
(1972) The university and primary medical care
N. Engl. J. Med.
(1969)Present strengths and weaknesses in current systems of comprehensive health services for children and youth
Am. J. Pub. Health
(1970)- et al.
Attitudes and satisfactions of low-income families receiving comprehensive health care
Am. J. Pub. Health
(1970) Effective patient care in the pediatric ambulatory setting: A study of the acute care clinic
Pediatrics
(1969)- et al.
Toward comprehensive ambulatory care: A case history of decisive change
Med. Care
(1970) - et al.
How well do patients take oral penicillin? A collaborative study in private practice
Pediatrics
(1967) - et al.
Gaps in doctor-patient communication: Patients' response to medical advice
N. Engl. J. Med.
(1969) Study of follow-up of children recommended for rheumatic fever prophylaxis
Am. J. Pub. Healt
(1956)Broken appointments
Pediatrics
(1964)
Some comparative costs in comprehensive versus fragmented pediatric care
Pediatrics
Cited by (63)
Continuity of Care in Fixed-Day Versus Variable-Day Resident Continuity Clinics
2010, Academic PediatricsCitation Excerpt :Whether greater value should be given to maintaining continuity of care or to preserving time in clinic warrants additional study. Multiple observers have argued that the longitudinal relationship between the physician and the patient and family is an essential component of pediatric practice and pediatric education.21–24 This view has strong support in the pediatric literature8–13 and is reflected in current ACGME program requirements for pediatric residency programs.14
Does Quality of Primary Care Vary by Level of Training in Pediatric Resident Continuity Practices?
2009, Academic PediatricsProviding timely access to care: What is the right patient panel size?
2007, Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient SafetyCitation Excerpt :We will revisit these issues later in the article. Although about ⅔ of all primary care physicians work in group practices,6 a number of studies7–10 have documented the benefits of continuity of care. These observations support the view that a patient should be seen, whenever possible, by his or her physician, and therefore, that a panel should be associated with an individual physician.
Having a physician rather than a place as a usual source of care would be better - from 2012 korea health panel data
2017, Journal of Korean Medical Science
- **
This research was supported by Grant 5-R18-HS00237 from the National Center for Health Services Research and Development.