Review
Frequent consulters in general practice: A systematic review of studies of prevalence, associations and outcome

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(98)00118-4Get rights and content

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review of the observational literature on frequent consulters in general practice. Electronic searching identified 34 studies which met our inclusion criteria. Frequent consulters were identified in a wide range of primary health care settings, confirming that a small proportion of patients is responsible for a disproportionate number of consultations. A cutoff of 9-14 consultations per annum was used to define a frequent consulter in most studies. Studies have examined a variety of associated characteristics, and indicate that frequent consulters are highly heterogeneous, and have high rates of physical disease, psychiatric illness and social difficulties. Few are likely to conform to the “heartsink” stereotype. These patients are likely to have multiple, complex problems, often including chronic physical disease, with or without psychological and social problems. The natural history of frequent consulting behavior seems to be to persist in many cases. Implications for management are discussed.

Introduction

It has long been observed that the general practitioner sees a proportion of his or her registered patients particularly frequently 1, 2. Why do these patients consult their doctors more than the average? This question has been addressed by a number of investigators in different parts of the world. However, the relevant literature is widely scattered and the conclusions of these studies not easy to ascertain. We have therefore conducted a systematic review of the literature on the topic.

Early studies were 1, 2 carried out by individual primary care doctors, struck by the prominence of frequent consulters in their own practices. This is a useful approach, as it rests on personal knowledge of these patients that may go back many years. Follow-up over time is especially valuable, and is much more practicable if patients are permanently registered with a given practice (such as in the UK National Health Service, or if the practice deals with all patients from a geographically circumscribed area [29]).

Later studies have often involved researchers from other disciplines, such as liaison psychiatrists, psychologists, health services researchers, etc., coming into the general practice, and carrying out interview or questionnaire assessment. Although such research teams have not often been available to follow up patients, the advantages of this approach include more comprehensive and objective measurement of relevant characteristics of these patients.

Various terms have been used to describe the topic including frequent attender, frequent consulter, high utilizer, and heart sink patient. We have chosen to use frequent consulter as a nonpejorative term that includes consultations at home as well as at the surgery and focuses upon contact with primary care rather than overall use of health resources.

Section snippets

Method

We searched for relevant reports on the electronic databases medline, psyclit, and embase and also consulted reference lists of retrieved articles, reviews, experts in the field, and the Science Citation Index. The medline search strategy combined MeSH and free-text terms as follows (similar strategies were used for the other databases):

  • 1.

    “FAMILY-PRACTICE”/all subheadings

  • 2.

    “PHYSICIANS, -FAMILY”/all subheadings

  • 3.

    “HEALTH-SERVICES-MISUSE”/all subheadings

  • 4.

    “HEALTH-SERVICES-RESEARCH”/all subheadings

  • 5.

Results

Thirty-four studies met the aforementioned criteria and are summarized in Table 1.

Limitations of the review process

The main limitation of the review process is that it may not have identified all relevant studies, especially those in languages other than English.

Limitations of studies reviewed

Not all of the studies included in this review used samples likely to be representative of the population concerned (these are marked in italics in Table 1); many of the remainder are small, highly selective, and therefore possibly unrepresentative. Varying case definitions (e.g., children/physical disease included/excluded) and study designs

References (36)

  • W.J. Katon et al.

    Somatizationa spectrum of severity

    Am J Psychiatry

    (1991)
  • E.H. Lin et al.

    Frustrating patientsphysician and patient perspectives among distressed high users of medical services

    J Gen Intern Med

    (1991)
  • P.J. Portegijs et al.

    A troubled youthrelations with somatization, depression and anxiety in adulthood

    Fam Pract

    (1996)
  • A.M. Ward et al.

    Stability of attendance in general practice

    Fam Pract

    (1994)
  • M. Courtenay et al.

    Frequent attendance in a family practice

    J R Coll Gen Pract

    (1974)
  • J.N. Westhead

    Frequent attenders in general practicemedical, psychological and social characteristics

    J R Coll Gen Pract

    (1995)
  • I. Svab et al.

    Frequent attenders in general practicea study from Slovenia

    Scand J Prim Health Care

    (1993)
  • G.B. Browne et al.

    Prevalence and characteristics of frequent attenders in a prepaid Canadian family practice

    J Fam Pract

    (1982)
  • Cited by (130)

    • The effects of patient's frequency of attendance and etiology of symptoms, on the General Practitioners wellbeing

      2021, Revue Europeenne de Psychologie Appliquee
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thereby, the negative consequences on the physicians’ wellbeing are associated to some of the patients’ characteristics, and not only to the high number of visits. Several studies show that physicians consider that many of the FAs suffer Medically Unexplained Symptoms (MUS) originated in psychological distress that may coexist with chronic illnesses, psychiatric complaints, personality disorders and/or psychosocial problems (e.g. Gill & Sharpe, 1999; Karlsson, Joukamaa, Lahti, Lehtinen, & Kokki-Saarinen, 1997; Vedsted & Christensen, 2005). In the absence of a satisfactory explanation for the motive of their medical symptoms, some of the MUS patients consult frequently, causing a partial overlap between FA and MUS.

    • The effects of nurse-led health coaching on health-related quality of life and clinical health outcomes among frequent attenders: A quasi-experimental study

      2020, Patient Education and Counseling
      Citation Excerpt :

      These studies found several predictive factors for frequent attendance, including older age, female gender, lower level of education, social and economic difficulties [17,18] and stressful life events [19–24]. However, the reviews [4,6] have found that frequent attenders are in all age groups. The quality of the physician-patient relationship has not been found to be associated with frequent attendance [25].

    • Frequent attenders in primary health care: A concept analysis

      2018, International Journal of Nursing Studies
      Citation Excerpt :

      There is no strong and coherent evidence of the effectiveness of the studies (Smits et al., 2008; Haroun et al., 2016). Although several authors have examined the characteristics of frequent attenders (Gill and Sharpe, 1999; Vedsted and Christensen, 2005), professionals have no clear theoretical or operational definitions of this concept. This makes it difficult to identify this patient group at an early stage in primary health care.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text