Elsevier

Physiology & Behavior

Volume 77, Issues 4–5, December 2002, Pages 537-543
Physiology & Behavior

Dopamine modulation of neuronal function in the monkey prefrontal cortex

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9384(02)00940-XGet rights and content

Abstract

We developed a brain slice preparation that allowed us to apply whole-cell recordings to examine the electrophysiological properties of identified synapses, neurons, and local circuits in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) of macaque monkeys. In this article, we summarize the results from some of our recent and current in vitro studies in the DLPFC with special emphasis on the modulatory effects of dopamine (DA) receptor activation on pyramidal and nonpyramidal cell function in superficial layers in DLPFC areas 46 and 9.

Introduction

In primates, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is involved in the planning and execution of complex behaviors, many of which require working memory (i.e., the ability to actively maintain and manipulate information in order to guide behavior). Working memory is often assessed in delayed-response tasks, in which a delay is imposed between the presentation of a cue and the execution of a response that requires cue-related information [1]. During this delay period, monkey DLPFC neurons show sustained firing, which correlates with the accuracy of task performance. Furthermore, delay-related firing can be sustained even in the presence of distractors that disrupt delay activity in other regions of the brain. Therefore, delay activity of DLPFC neurons is considered a crucial element for the active maintenance of information in working memory [1].

In primates, the DLPFC has reciprocal connections with a wide range of neocortical and subcortical regions, suggesting that neurons in the DLPFC are strategically positioned to mediate the cross-modal and cross-temporal associations required for complex behavior. In addition to its unique extrinsic connectivity, the intrinsic connections in the DLPFC may play a special role for information storage during working memory tasks. Of particular interest are the long-range horizontal connections furnished by the axon collaterals of layers 2/3 pyramidal cells, which interconnect clusters of neurons located in the same layers [2], [3]. Long-range connections between clusters seem to target almost exclusively other pyramidal cells [4], in contrast to the local “within-cluster” connections made by pyramidal neurons, which contact pyramidal cells and GABAergic interneurons with similar frequencies [4]. These long-range connections are a potential substrate for reverberating activity through recurrent excitation, which could maintain persistent delay activity [5].

Input from mesencephalic dopamine (DA) cell groups is essential to the role of the DLPFC in working memory function. Either selective DA denervation or blockade of DA receptors significantly impairs behavioral performance in delayed-response tasks [6], [7]. In addition, electrophysiological studies in vivo show that delay activity is influenced by manipulations of DA receptor activation [8], [9] suggesting that DA signaling in DLPFC may stabilize delay-period activity [10]. However, to date, the cellular mechanisms by which DA affects neuronal function in the neocortex remain unclear.

Several lines of evidence suggest that both anatomy and function of the mesoprefrontal DA system differ significantly between the brains of primate and nonprimate species. Chief among these differences is the laminar distribution of DA fibers and DA receptors, which in monkey and human PFC are abundant in both deep and superficial layers (Fig. 4), but in the PFC of rats are abundant only in layers 5 and 6 [11], [12], [13]. Because superficial layers contain the majority of DLPFC neurons that provide output to and receive input from other neocortical regions, the influence of DA on intracortical communication might be qualitatively different in primates compared to rodents. All previous in vitro electrophysiological studies on the actions of DA in the PFC employed nonprimate animal models and assumed that findings from these studies can be generalized to the primate PFC. This assumption may be valid concerning the basic cellular and molecular mechanisms by which DA exerts its neuromodulatory actions (e.g., DA acts through G-protein coupled receptors whose structure is highly conserved across mammalian species). However, due to the differences in the organization of the neocortical microcircuits between rodents and primates [14], problems might arise regarding the interpretation of the DA effects at the network level. To help gain a better understanding of the functional architecture and the cellular mechanisms of DA modulation of neuronal activity, we developed a brain slice preparation from the DLPFC of macaque monkeys [15]. In this article, we describe results from our studies, which have explored the superficial layers of areas 46 and 9, and which focus on the effects that DA has on well-defined elements of the DLPFC microcircuitry.

Section snippets

Methods

Slices from the DLPFC of young adult (3.5–6 kg; 4–5 years old) male cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) were obtained using methods previously described in detail [15]. Animals were treated according to the guidelines outlined in the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, as approved by the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. DLPFC tissue blocks were placed in an ice-cold solution and slices of 350- or 400-μm

Results

To test how DA receptor activation modulates the excitability of layer 3 pyramidal cells, we applied low concentrations of DA (0.5–50 μM) while recording the somatic membrane potential. DA did not significantly change the resting membrane potential or the input resistance of pyramidal cells [16], suggesting that DA does not modulate channels that are open near rest. In contrast, depolarizing current steps of fixed amplitude elicited more spikes after DA application than under control conditions

Discussion

Microdialysis studies in primate DLPFC have shown that the extracellular DA concentration increases during delayed-response tasks, compared to baseline levels or to control tasks involving no delay [27]. Thus, it is expected that increased DA receptor activation will take place during tasks that require working memory, as suggested by previous in vivo electrophysiology studies [9]. Extracellular recordings in the monkey DLPFC in vivo provide limited information regarding the cellular

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by MH51234, MH 45156, and a NARSAD Young Investigator Award (to G. González-Burgos). We would like to thank Darlene Melchitzky, Mary Brady, Erin Connell, Dianne Cruz, Christine Edgar, Colin Stebbins, Olga Krimer, and Ingelore Kröner for excellent assistance with histology and neuron reconstruction. We also thank Wright Bagwell and Giovanna DiBlasi for participating in early phases of this work; Stephan Ursu, David McMahon, and Eduardo Calixto for their help with some of

References (31)

  • D.S. Melchitzky et al.

    Synaptic targets of the intrinsic axon collaterals of supragranular pyramidal neurons in monkey prefrontal cortex

    J. Comp. Neurol.

    (2001)
  • T.J. Brozoski et al.

    Cognitive deficit caused by regional depletion of dopamine in prefrontal cortex of rhesus monkey

    Science

    (1979)
  • T. Sawaguchi et al.

    D1 dopamine receptors in prefrontal cortex: involvement in working memory

    Science

    (1991)
  • D. Durstewitz et al.

    Neurocomputational models of working memory

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (2000)
  • T.M. Preuss

    Do rats have prefrontal cortex? The Rose–Woolsey–Akert program reconsidered

    J. Cogn. Neurosci.

    (1995)
  • Cited by (33)

    • Dopamine tunes prefrontal outputs to orchestrate aversive processing

      2019, Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Both D1 and D2 sub-types are G-protein-coupled receptors, exerting slow, metabotropic modulation of postsynaptic cells (for review, see: Seamans and Yang et al., 2004). Activation of D1 receptors in the mPFC produces excitatory effects through modulation of sodium (Na+), potassium (K+), and calcium (Ca2+) currents (González-Burgos et al., 2002; Gorelova and Yang, 2000; Henze et al., 2000; Yang and Seamans, 1996). In contrast, activation of mPFC D2 receptors exerts an inhibitory effect through the modulation of glutamatergic receptors and Na+ conductances (Gorelova and Yang, 2000; Gulledge and Jaffe, 1998, 2001).

    • D<inf>1</inf> receptor-mediated inhibition of medial prefrontal cortex neurons is disrupted in adult rats exposed to amphetamine in adolescence

      2016, Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, AMPH-induced changes in serotonergic signaling are unlikely to play a major role in the loss of sensitivity of prefrontal neurons to D1-induced increases in sIPSCs that we observed in drug-exposed rats. The PFC’s top-down control of executive functions relies on deep layer output neurons that are tightly controlled by interneurons (González-Burgos et al., 2002). Accordingly, disruption of GABAergic function in the mPFC results in a broad spectrum of cognitive impairments (Gonzalez-Burgos et al., 2011; Enomoto et al., 2011).

    • Brief dopaminergic stimulations produce transient physiological changes in prefrontal pyramidal neurons

      2011, Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      In support of this notion rapid changes in cortical dopamine concentrations, over the course of several seconds, have been directly detected by electrochemical methods (Rebec et al., 1997; Richardson and Gratton, 1998). But exactly how changes in cortical dopamine tone affect cortical neuronal circuits and cortical signal processing remains a topic of active debate (Gorelova and Yang, 2000; Henze et al., 2000; Gulledge and Jaffe, 2001; Maurice et al., 2001; Seamans et al., 2001; Gonzalez-Burgos et al., 2002; Gao et al., 2003; Tseng and O'Donnell, 2005). Stimulation of dopaminergic receptors in the prefrontal cortex in vivo, either by dopamine released by VTA stimulation or exogenously applied via pipette, yielded important information on the effect of rapid dopamine signaling on action potential firing rates (Bernardi et al., 1982; Thierry et al., 1986; Godbout et al., 1991; Pirot et al., 1992; Sesack et al., 1995b; Lewis and O'Donnell, 2000; Floresco and Grace, 2003).

    • Ethanol and acetaldehyde action on central dopamine systems: mechanisms, modulation, and relationship to stress

      2009, Alcohol
      Citation Excerpt :

      Dopamine neurons of the VTA appear to play a critical role in processes involved in addiction. Whether it is assessment of salience of reinforcing environmental cues (Mirenowicz and Schultz, 1996) or facilitation of plasticity in target regions (Durstewitz et al., 2000; Gonzalez-Burgos et al., 2002; Lapish et al., 2006), it is clear that dopaminergic neurotransmission is important in processes leading to addiction. The dopamine neurons of the VTA are thought to be the source of dopamine for the NAc and prefrontal cortex (Oades and Halliday, 1987).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Present address: Department of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

    2

    Present address: Department of Neuroscience, Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, PA, USA.

    View full text