Consensus for tinnitus patient assessment and treatment outcome measurement: Tinnitus Research Initiative meeting, Regensburg, July 2006

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(07)66050-6Get rights and content

Abstract

There is widespread recognition that consistency between research centres in the ways that patients with tinnitus are assessed and outcomes following interventions are measured would facilitate more effective co-operation and more meaningful evaluations and comparisons of outcomes. At the first Tinnitus Research Initiative meeting held in Regensburg in July 2006 an attempt was made through workshops to gain a consensus both for patient assessments and for outcome measurements. It is hoped that this will contribute towards better cooperation between research centres in finding and evaluating treatments for tinnitus by allowing better comparability between studies.

Introduction

Chronic tinnitus, the phantom perception of sound, can be a debilitating and life-altering experience. It affects millions of people in western countries. Despite the enormous social and economic burden tinnitus causes, no well-established specific treatment for this disorder is available. Among the reasons for this unsatisfactory situation are the difficulties in assessing tinnitus as it is a purely self-report subjective phenomenon.

There is widespread recognition that consistency between research centres in the ways that patients with tinnitus are assessed and outcomes following interventions are measured would facilitate more effective co-operation and more meaningful evaluations and comparisons of outcomes. On the other hand most research centres already have long established systems for collecting and assessing data and hence are unable or unwilling to completely change to a different system because so much would be lost.

At the recent (July, 2006) Tinnitus Research Initiative meeting in Regensburg, Germany an attempt was made through workshops to gain a consensus both for patient assessments and for outcome measurements.

It is hoped that this consensus will facilitate cooperation between tinnitus research centres in finding and evaluating treatments for tinnitus and will help achieve more meaningful comparisons between studies.

Section snippets

There is a need for consensus on assessment and outcome measurement

There is an urgent need for a set of assessment methods to be agreed and utilised by the international tinnitus research community. This includes assessment of patients with tinnitus and subsequent measurement of outcomes following intervention.

Consistency in assessment of patients with tinnitus will advance the characterisation of their tinnitus into subtypes. As results for most known therapeutic interventions are very inconsistent, the identification of predictors for the effectiveness of

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Ulli Soltani for organisational assistance.

References (15)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (268)

  • Validated French translation of the ESIT-SQ standardized tinnitus screening questionnaire

    2023, Annales Francaises d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie et de Pathologie Cervico-Faciale
  • Validated French translation of the ESIT-SQ standardized tinnitus screening questionnaire

    2023, European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases
  • Hearing aid effectiveness on patients with chronic tinnitus and associated hearing loss

    2022, Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Loudness and MML are valid measures of sound perception as they estimate tinnitus magnitude and can be used after intervention to evaluate their immediate effect, for example, after sound therapies strategies or magnetic transcranial stimulation techniques. Those measures are still recommended as a parameter for evaluating the results of tinnitus long-term interventions.17,40 Changes in tinnitus pitch, on the other hand, may point out a sign of central nervous system tonotopy reorganization and neural plasticity.41

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text