Elsevier

Urology

Volume 48, Issue 5, November 1996, Pages 773-777
Urology

Adult urology
The capsure database: a methodology for clinical practice and research in prostate cancer*

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00226-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives

Implicit in the modern concept of patient outcome assessment is a shift from primary reliance on clinical indicators to a broader definition that includes physical, psychological, and social well-being. This is especially true of prostate cancer, where treatment can profoundly alter patient well-being. We have initiated a longitudinal observational database, CaPSURE (Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor) to document the impact of prostate cancer on resource utilization, clinical outcomes, health-related quality of life, and survival in typical practice settings.

Methods

Observational databases have been used in the treatment of other conditions. We have incorporated many well-tested elements in our study. Data are collected from two sources: the physician and the patient. The urologist enrolls eligible patients into the study, completes a medical history, and records current status, treatment, and laboratory results at each office visit. Patients complete quarterly questionnaires on health-related quality of life, resource utilization, work loss, and satisfaction with care.

Results

Currently 21 sites participate in CaPSURE with 1419 patients enrolled by April 1996. Twenty percent of patients are newly diagnosed with prostate cancer. Time since diagnosis averages 3.0 years (SD = 3.1); mean age at diagnosis is 68.9 years (SD = 7.9, range = 39.6 to 90.7). The majority of patients (72%) are diagnosed with Stage B cancer. Patients receive a variety of treatments including surgery, irradiation, hormonal therapy, and watchful waiting.

Conclusions

Information available from CaPSURE will assist practicing urologists who must make clinical decisions on the basis of data such as the results of treatment in typical care settings, the effect of prostate cancer and its treatment methods on patient quality of life, and the effect on health care costs of the early detection of prostate cancer.

References (27)

  • FriesJF

    The chronic disease databank model: a conceptual framework for the computer-based medical record

    Comput Biomed Res

    (1992)
  • World Health Organization
  • LitwinMS et al.

    Quality-of-life outcomes in men treated for localized prostate cancer

    JAMA

    (1995)
  • WingoPA et al.

    Cancer statistics, 1995

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (1995)
  • BoringCC et al.

    Tong T and Montgomery S

    Cancer statistics, 1994. CA Cancer J Clin

    (1994)
  • PryorDB et al.

    Clinical data bases: accomplishments and unrealized potential

    Med Care

    (1985)
  • FriesJF et al.

    The dimensions of health outcomes: the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability, and pain scales

    J Rheumatol

    (1982)
  • WolfeF et al.

    A multicenter study of hospitalization in rheumatoid arthritis: effect of health care system severity, and regional difference

    J Rheumatol

    (1986)
  • WolfeF et al.

    The clinical value of the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire Functional Disability Index in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

    J Rheumatol

    (1988)
  • LubeckDP et al.

    A multicenter study of annual health service utilization and costs in rheumatoid arthritis

    Arthritis Rheum

    (1986)
  • LubeckDP

    The economic impact of rheumatoid arthritis

  • LubeckDP

    The economic impact of arthritis

    Arth Care Res

    (1995)
  • LubeckDP et al.

    A question of value: measuring the impact of chronic disease

    Milbank Q

    (1988)
  • Cited by (255)

    • The multiple effects of aspirin in prostate cancer patients

      2021, Cancer Treatment and Research Communications
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    *

    This research is supported by funding from TAP Holdings Inc., Deerfield, Illinois.

    The CaPSURE Research Panel also includes James Cochran, Donald Finnerty, Eugene Kramalowsky, Robert Segaul, and Jay Young.

    View full text