Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 361, Issue 9376, 28 June 2003, Pages 2217-2225
The Lancet

Seminar
Cervical cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13778-6Get rights and content

Summary

Cervical cancer is a serious health problem, with nearly 500 000 women developing the disease each year worldwide. Most cases occur in less developed countries where no effective screening systems are available. Risk factors include exposure to human papillomavirus, smoking, and immune-system dysfunction. Most women with early-stage tumours can be cured, although long-term morbidity from treatment is common. Results of randomised clinical trials have shown that for women with locally advanced cancers, chemoradiotherapy should be regarded as the standard of care; however, the applicability of this treatment to women in less developed countries remains largely untested. Many women with localised (stage IB) tumours even now receive various combinations of surgery and radiotherapy, despite unresolved concern about the morbidity of this approach compared with definitive radiotherapy or radical surgery. Treatment of recurrent cervical cancer remains largely ineffective. Quality of life should be taken into account in treatment of women with primary and recurrent cervical cancer.

Section snippets

Epidemiology and risk factors

Worldwide, cervical cancer is the second most common malignant disease among women, with nearly 80% of cases arising in less developed countries (table 1).1 The American Cancer Society estimates that during 2002, 13 000 cases of cervical cancer were diagnosed in women living in the USA, and that 4100 women will die as a result of this disease.2 In North America, the median age at diagnosis is 47 years, and nearly half of cases are diagnosed before the age of 35. However, women older than 55

Diagnosis and pathology

Cervical cancer may be suspected on analysis of a Pap smear or visualisation of a lesion on the cervix. A biopsy sample must be taken from any suspicious lesion, because many Pap smears are non-diagnostic or falsely negative in the presence of invasive cancer. If a biopsy sample shows cells suggesting microinvasion, and if the patient does not have a grossly apparent invasive cancer, a cone biopsy should be done. For accurate staging of clinically occult lesions, sufficient underlying stroma

Staging and prognosis

Once a tissue diagnosis of invasive carcinoma has been established, the patient is staged (table 2). Stage is determined at the time of primary diagnosis and should never be changed, even after recurrence or on discovery of more extensive disease during surgery. Stage is determined clinically, on the basis mainly of the size of the tumour in the cervix or its extension into the pelvis. Modifications to the FIGO staging system were made in 1994 to clarify the description of microinvasive

Stage IA

In many more developed countries with established Pap-smear screening systems, microinvasive or stage IA cervical cancers are commonly detected in women who are symptom free with cervices that seem normal on gross examination. The diagnosis is usually made after a cervical conisation, although many cases of superficially invasive cervical cancer are incidentally discovered after hysterectomy. If the focus of invasion extends no deeper than 3 mm below the basement membrane (stage IA1), the risk

Chemotherapy

Chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent disease has been and continues to be considered palliative. Many agents have been investigated, as single or combined regimens.86 Response rates in multicentre phase-2 trials average 10–40%, with complete responses seen only rarely and for short duration. Cisplatin is at present deemed the most active single agent in recurrent disease. When it was combined with paclitaxel in a phase-2 study, an overall response rate of 46·3% was recorded (12·2% with

Conclusion

Over the past decade, women with cervical cancer of all stages have benefited from tremendous improvements in the treatment of this disease. These advances, unfortunately, have not been extended to the vast majority of women affected by the disease, who live in impoverished countries with limited resources and no screening programmes. Gynaecological and radiation oncologists practising in more affluent countries are aware of the substantial discrepancy in treatment options available for women

Search strategy and selection criteria

I searched Medline (1990–2001) using the terms “cervical cancer” and “cervical neoplasia”. Initial search results were selected from papers published in English on human beings, then limited by use of the terms “epidemiology”, “natural history”, “treatment”, “radiation therapy”, “chemotherapy”, “chemoradiation therapy”, and “surgery”. Reference lists of articles identified by this strategy were searched, and additional relevant publications were selected. Preference for inclusion was

References (92)

  • CJ Tseng et al.

    Conservative conization for microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (1997)
  • WT Creasman

    Stage IA cancer of the cervix: finally some resolution of definition and treatment?

    Gynecol Oncol

    (1999)
  • WT Creasman et al.

    Early invasive carcinoma of the cervix (3 to 5 mm invasion): risk factors and prognosis: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (1998)
  • WB Jones et al.

    Early invasive carcinoma of the cervix

    Gynecol Oncol

    (1993)
  • LD Roman et al.

    Influence of quantity of lymph-vascular space invasion on the risk of nodal metastases in women with early-stage squamous cancer of the cervix

    Gynecol Oncol

    (1998)
  • A Covens et al.

    Prognostic factors for relapse and pelvic node metastasis in early stage I adenocarcinoma of the cervix

    Gynecol Oncol

    (1999)
  • JO Schorge et al.

    Prospective management of stage IA1 cervical adenocarcinoma by conization alone to preserve fertility: a preliminary report

    Gynecol Oncol

    (2000)
  • ME Potter et al.

    Early invasive cervical cancer with pelvic lymph node involvement: to complete or not to complete radical hysterectomy?

    Gynecol Oncol

    (1990)
  • F Landoni et al.

    Class II versus class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer: a prospective randomized study

    Gynecol Oncol

    (2001)
  • A Sedlis et al.

    A randomized trial of pelvic radiation therapy versus no further therapy in selected patients with stage IB carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

    Gynecol Oncol

    (1999)
  • WK Kinney et al.

    Value of adjuvant whole-pelvis irradiation after Wertheim hysterectomy for early-stage squamous carcinoma of the cervix with pelvic nodal metastasis: a matched case-control study

    Gynecol Oncol

    (1989)
  • DG Petereit et al.

    High-dose-rate versus low-dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer: analysis of tumor recurrence-the University of Wisconsin experience

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (1999)
  • CA Perez et al.

    Carcinoma of the uterine cervix. I. Impact of prolongation of treatment time and timing of brachytherapy on outcome of radiation therapy

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (1995)
  • BJ Monk et al.

    Extent of disease as an indication for pelvic radiation following radical hysterectomy and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection in the treatment of stage IB and IIA cervical carcinoma

    Gynecol Oncol

    (1994)
  • F Landoni et al.

    Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage IB-IIA cervical cancer

    Lancet

    (1997)
  • F Landoni et al.

    Class II versus class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer: a prospective randomized study

    Gynecol Oncol

    (2001)
  • A O'Quinn et al.

    Guidelines for conservative hysterectomy after irradiation

    Gynecol Oncol

    (1980)
  • W Mendenhall et al.

    Stage IB-IIA-B carcinoma of the intact uterine cervix greater than or equal to 6 cm in diameter: is adjuvant extrafascial hysterectomy beneficial?

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (1991)
  • CA Perez et al.

    Radiation therapy alone or combined with surgery in treatment of barrel-shaped carcinoma of the uterine cervix (stage IB, IIA, IIB)

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (1985)
  • JD Bloss et al.

    A phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to radical hysterectomy and/or radiation therapy in the management of advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix

    Gynecol Oncol

    (1995)
  • JA Green et al.

    Survival and recurrence after concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cancer of the uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Lancet

    (2001)
  • C Haie et al.

    Is prophylactic para-aortic irradiation worthwhile in the treatment of advanced cervical carcinoma? Results of a controlled clinical trial of the EORTC radiotherapy group

    Radiother Oncol

    (1988)
  • AJ Mundt et al.

    Initial clinical experience with intensity-modulated whole pelvis radiation therapy in women with gynecologic malignancies

    Gynecol Oncol

    (2001)
  • L Portelance et al.

    Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) reduces small bowel, rectum, and bladder doses in patients with cervical cancer receiving pelvic and para-aortic irradiation

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2001)
  • T Ijaz et al.

    Radiation therapy of pelvic recurrence after radical hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma

    Gynecol Oncol

    (1998)
  • RL Coleman et al.

    Radical hysterectomy for recurrent carcinoma of the uterine cervix after radiotherapy

    Gynecol Oncol

    (1994)
  • MA Penalver et al.

    Continent urinary diversion in gynecologic oncology

    Gynecol Oncol

    (1989)
  • LR Schover

    Quality counts: the value of women's perceived quality of life after cervical cancer

    Gynecol Oncol

    (2000)
  • E Greimel et al.

    Prospective assessment of quality of life of female cancer patients

    Gynecol Oncol

    (2002)
  • ParkinDM et al.

    Cancer incidence in five continents, vol VII

    International Agency for Research on Cancer, Scientific Publications number 143

    (1997)
  • A Jemal et al.

    Cancer statistics, 2002

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (2002)
  • H Sung et al.

    Papanicolaou smear history and diagnosis of invasive cervical carcinoma among members of a large prepaid health plan

    Cancer

    (2000)
  • FX Bosch et al.

    Prevalence of human papillomavirus in cervical cancer: a worldwide perspective

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (1995)
  • S Chichareon et al.

    Risk factors for cervical cancer in Thailand: a case-control study

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (1998)
  • C Ngelangel et al.

    Causes of cervical cancer in the Philippines: a case-control study

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (1998)
  • LA Koutsky et al.

    A cohort study of the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 in relation to papillomavirus infection

    N Engl J Med

    (1992)
  • Cited by (866)

    • Radiosensitization by Hyperthermia Critically Depends on the Time Interval

      2024, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text