Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 367, Issue 9509, 11–17 February 2006, Pages 449-450
The Lancet

Comment
What are the implications of optimism bias in clinical research?

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68153-1Get rights and content

References (16)

  • B Djulbegovic et al.

    The uncertainty principle and industry-sponsored research

    Lancet

    (2000)
  • PC Gøtzsche

    Reference bias in reports of drug trials

    BMJ

    (1987)
  • IoannidisJPA

    Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research

    JAMA

    (2005)
  • H Mann et al.

    Choosing a control intervention for a randomised clinical trial

    BMC Med Res Methodol

    (2003)
  • AW Chan et al.

    Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles

    JAMA

    (2004)
  • VM Montori et al.

    Randomized trials stopped early for benefit: a systematic review

    JAMA

    (2005)
  • DJ Spiegelhalter et al.

    Bayesian approaches to randomized trials

    J R Stat Soc [Ser A]

    (1994)
  • DJ Spiegelhalter

    Incorporating Bayesian ideas into health-care evaluation

    Stat Sci

    (2004)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text