Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 348, Issue 9036, 2 November 1996, Pages 1189-1196
The Lancet

Articles
Ovarian ablation in early breast cancer: overview of the randomised trials

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(96)05023-4Get rights and content

Summary

Background

Among women with early breast cancer, the effects of ovarian ablation on recurrence and death have been assessed by several randomised trials that now have long follow-up. In this report, the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group present their third 5-yearly systematic overview (meta-analysis), now with 15 years' follow-up.

Methods

In 1995, information was sought on each patient in any randomised trial of ovarian ablation or suppression versus control that began before 1990. Data were obtained for 12 of the 13 studies that assessed ovarian ablation by irradiation or surgery, all of which began before 1980, but not for the four studies that assessed ovarian suppression by drugs, all of which began after 1985. Menopausal status was not consistently defined across trials; therefore, the main analyses are limited to women aged under 50 (rather than “premenopausal”) when randomised. Oestrogen receptors were measured only in the trials of ablation plus cytotoxic chemotherapy versus the same chemotherapy alone.

Findings

Among 2102 women aged under 50 when randomised, most of whom would have been premenopausal at diagnosis, 1130 deaths and an additional 153 recurrences were reported. 15-year survival was highly significantly improved among those allocated ovarian ablation (52·4 vs46·1%, 6·3 [SD 2·3] fewer deaths per 100 women, logrank 2p=0·001), as was recurrence-free survival (45·0 vs 39·0%, 2p=0·0007). The numbers of events were too small for any subgroup analyses to be reliable. The benefit was, however, significant both for those with (“node positive”) and for those without (“node negative”) axillary spread when diagnosed. In the trials of ablation plus cytotoxic chemotherapy versus the same chemotherapy alone, the benefit appeared smaller (even for women with oestrogen receptors detected on the primary tumour) than in the trials of ablation in the absence of chemotherapy (where the observed survival improvements were about six per 100 node-negative women and 12 per 100 node-positive women). Among 1354 women aged 50 or over when randomised, most of whom would have been perimenopausal or postmenopausal, there was only a nonsignificant improvement in survival and recurrence-free survival. improves long-term survival, at least in the absence of chemotherapy. Further randomised evidence is needed on the additional effects of ovarian ablation in the presence of other adjuvant treatments, and to assess the relevance of hormone-receptor measurements.

Interpretation

In women aged under 50 with early breast cancer, ablation of functioning ovaries significantly

Introduction

Since 1985 the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) has, every 5 years, organised systematic overviews (meta-analyses) of data from individual patients from all randomised trials of the treatment of operable breast cancer.1, 2, 3, 4 This report presents the information from the third cycle for trials of ovarian ablation, based on the data collected in 1995, which yields at least 15 years of follow-up for most women.

Section snippets

Methods

Trial identification and data-checking procedures for the EBCTCG overviews have been described.1, 2, 3 The aim here was to review all properly randomised trials that began recruiting before 1990 and compared the ablation or suppression of ovarian function, sometimes with the addition of prednisone, versus no such adjuvant treatment. In practice, all the trials that can be reviewed here began before 1980, and all involved surgical or radiotherapeutic ablation (see below). To be “properly

Women aged under 50 at entry

Recurrence-free survival-Among women aged under 50, by year 15 there were 6·0 (SD 2·3) fewer recurrences or deaths per 100 women allocated ovarian ablation (45·0vs39·0% alive and with no history of local or distant recurrence 15 years after randomisation, logrank 2p=0·0007, Figure 1, recurrence-free survival). This highly significant difference was, in absolute terms, somewhat smaller than had been suggested by the previous cycle of higher in the first 5 years than later, most of the absolute

Discussion

For women aged under 50 years, most of whom were premenopausal when diagnosed, these updated analyses continue to show that ovarian ablation produced a highly significant improvement in recurrence-free and in overall survival. The relevance of nodal status could be assessed only in trials of ovarian ablation in the absence of cytotoxic chemotherapy, and in these there was significant benefit both for women with and for those without axillary spread. The risk reduction produced by ovarian

References (15)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

List of participants at end of report

View full text