A Boolean approach to the measurement of group processes and attitudes: The concept of integration as an example
Section snippets
Integration: a formal approach
One of the most important research topics in contemporary sociology is the adaptation of specific cultural minorities to the norms and values of the modern urban industrialized society. Whether this process is defined as a shift between cultures or as a shift from tradition to modernity, most theories emphasize the variability of the individual attitudes in reaction to the confrontation with a different value system. A person does not become integrated by switching immediately from a
Boolean analysis: the method
‘Boolean analysis’ is used as a collective name for those methods based on the translation of research problems into a Boolean framework, and by solving them by applying the axioms and theorems of Boolean algebra.2 Based on the work of Flament (1976), the method is used here to illustrate its applicability for structuring the indicators of the integration process. Boolean algebra entails the possibility of introducing a partial order
Boolean analysis and the measurement of integration
The interesting feature of the Boolean approach is the translation of a set of response patterns into a hierarchical structure. But the method has its weaknesses as well. The first problem concerns the obtained structure. Although Boolean analysis results in an implication scheme, there is no guarantee that the obtained scheme results in a structure that suits the formal description of the process under investigation, in this case cultural integration. Moreover, an implication scheme yields a
Boolean analysis and the integration process: some examples
These examples discuss only one aspect of the integration process, namely the changing gender relations.4 The respondents were confronted with the following statements:
(a) A woman always has to obey her husband.
(b) A woman can talk to
Conclusions and discussion
The Boolean approach of Flament (1976) enables one to reduce a set of response patterns, by using Boolean minimization, into a set of prime implicants (PCUs) on which several structures can be built. These structures are obtained by dividing the set of observed patterns into a set of accepted and rejected patterns, called dichotomization. Further research of Van Buggenhaut, 1987, Van Buggenhaut and Degreef, 1987 and Theuns (1992) explored the possibilities of dichotomizing mainly based on
References (19)
- et al.
Languages for the assessment of knowledge
Journal of Mathematical Psychology
(1986) - et al.
Spaces for assessment of knowledge
International Journal of Man-Machine Studies
(1985) Group Beliefs. A Conception For Analyzing Group Structure, Processes, and Behavior
(1990)- et al.
Immigration et espace public
(1993) Rings of sets
Duke Mathematical Journal
(1937)- et al.
Introduction to knowledge spaces: how to build, test and search them
Psychological Review
(1990) Analyse Booléenne de questionnaire
(1976)- Janssens, R., 1995. A Boolean Approach to Attitude Measurement. Ph.D. Thesis, Vrije Universiteit...
Evolutie en waardepatronen m.b.t. de man-vrouw relaties
Cited by (7)
Generalized inductive item tree analysis
2021, Journal of Mathematical PsychologyCitation Excerpt :To be explicit, this paper aims at providing generalizations of the IITA method, not of KST, for polytomous (i.e., multi-category) items. Things can even get more complicated when we consider applications of IITA to items from social science questionnaires (e.g., Bart & Krus, 1973; Janssens, 1999; Martin & Wiley, 2000; Schrepp, 2002; Wiley & Martin, 1999). Questionnaires of this sort typically contain statements that subjects can agree or disagree with.
On the evaluation of fit measures for quasi-orders
2007, Mathematical social sciencesITA 2.0: A program for classical and inductive item tree analysis
2006, Journal of Statistical SoftwareExplorative analysis of empirical data by boolean analysis of questionnaires
2002, Zeitschrift fur Psychologie