Short communicationThe effect of shaking regime on the rate and extent of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose
Introduction
Production of fuel ethanol from lignocellulosic feedstocks, such as hardwoods, softwoods and herbaceous materials, may involve an enzymatic hydrolysis sub-process during which the feedstocks' cellulose fraction is converted to glucose monomers, which can subsequently be fermented to ethanol by ethanologenic micro-organisms (Zacchi and Galbe, 1998). While the acid hydrolysis reaction is faster and more effective, enzymatic saccharification remains a favoured unit operation for the bioconversion process as it requires milder conditions and does not produce sugar degradation products that are inhibitory to fermentative micro-organisms (Hsu, 1996).
The rate and extent of cellulose hydrolysis by cellulase enzymes is influenced by many substrate and enzyme related factors (Esteghlalian et al., 1999) including the heterogeneity of the reactants, a liquid enzyme acting upon a solid substrate. Therefore, adequate mixing is required to ensure sufficient contact between the substrate and enzymes and to promote heat and mass transfer within the reaction vessel. It has been shown, however, that excessive mixing can deactivate the enzymes and reduce the conversion yield. This effect has been attributed to the shear force generated by the mixer and the entrapment of air bubbles into the medium at the air–liquid surface (Reese and Ryu, 1980, Mukataka et al., 1983). Mukataka et al. (1983) have shown that excessively high mixing speeds (>200 rpm) could lower the extent of cellulose conversion (Avicel and paper pulp) while moderate mixing speeds (100–200 rpm) provide a good combination of fast initial hydrolysis rates and high conversion yields. Studies conducted by Tengborg showed that while mixing speeds (paddle mixer) as high as 340 rpm enhanced the conversion of steam-pretreated spruce wood, higher mixing speeds (340–510 rpm) only increased the initial rate of hydrolysis and not the final conversion yield (Tengborg, 2000). Others also found that increasing the agitation speed (magnetic stirring) from 380 to 1500 rpm increased the conversion of soybean hulls (Enayati and Parulekar, 1995).
Intermittent mixing regimes that combine intervals of no-mixing with short periods of high or low speed mixing can benefit the enzymatic hydrolysis process by reducing energy consumption and limiting enzyme inactivation due to lower shearing of the reaction mixture, while providing reasonably high conversion yields (Nguyen, 1998). In this study we evaluated the effectiveness of an intermittent shaking regime, in comparison with continuous shaking at high or low speed, for saccharification of cellulose under various substrate concentrations.
Section snippets
Substrate
α-Cellulose (Sigma, 90% purity) was used as the substrate in all experiments.
Enzymes
The cellulase enzyme used in this study was a commercial Trichoderma reesei cellulase preparation (Celluclast) from Novo-Nordisk, Denmark. Celluclast was supplemented with a β-glucosidase preparation, Novozym 188 (Novo-Nordisk, Denmark), to prevent product inhibition within the reaction medium. The total protein concentration in the enzyme solutions and hydrolysate samples was measured by the Biorad protein assay
Results and discussion
The hydrolysis profile at 2.5% (w/v) substrate concentration (Fig. 1a) indicated that the extent of shaking primarily influenced the initial rate of hydrolysis and not the conversion yield after 72 h. The high-speed shaking (150 rpm) produced the highest initial rate and final yield (82%), followed by the intermittent and low-speed shaking regimes, both resulting in 79% final conversion.
Increasing the substrate concentration to 7.5% (w/v) reduced the initial hydrolysis rate and the 72 h
Conclusions
The results of this study suggested that the conversion of cellulose was more affected by the substrate concentration rather than the shaking regime employed, and that intermittent shaking could be nearly as efficient as continuous, high-speed shaking in producing reasonable conversion yields. It is yet to be determined whether the energy savings obtained by intermittent shaking would justify the slightly lower yields associated with this mixing pattern.
Acknowledgements
The IEA Bioenergy provided the financial support for H.I. during the course of this study. We would like to thank Mr Quang Nguyen (NREL, Golden, CO) and Dr Shawn Mansfield (UBC Wood Science, Vancouver, Canada) for their helpful comments.
References (10)
- et al.
Shear inactivation of cellulose of Trichoderma reesei
Enzyme and Microbial Technology
(1980) - et al.
Substrate reactivity as a function of the extent of reaction in the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose
Biotechnol. Bioeng.
(1997) - et al.
Enzymatic saccharification of soybean hull based materials
Biotechnol. Prog.
(1995) - Esteghlalian, A., Srivatsava, V., Gilkes, N., Gregg, D.J., Saddler, J.N., 1999. An overview of factors influencing the...
Pretreatment of biomass
Cited by (88)
Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis of bamboo biomass for enhanced saccharification of cellulose through Taguchi orthogonal design
2021, Journal of Environmental Chemical EngineeringCitation Excerpt :However, Gaikwad and Chakraborty revealed that higher mixing speed can induce product (glucose and cellobiose) inhibition [26,27]. In some cases, intermediate agitation was found to be as efficient as high mixing speed when compared on the basis of conversion and yield [28]. Hence, in order to identify most efficient agitation condition, the optimization of mixing speed for enzymatic hydrolysis of bamboo biomass is requisite.
Effect of the stirring speed in the in vitro activity of α-amylase
2021, Food Hydrocolloids