Reliability of digital videometry and acetate tracing in measuring the surface area of cutaneous wounds
Introduction
Wound healing research requires an accurate and reproducible method to assess wound size. In addition, clinical care of chronic wounds can benefit from routine assessment of wound size, in order to evaluate the efficacy of treatment regimens. For both medical scientists and clinicians, the technique of choice is often indirect measurement of wound surface area by tracing the perimeter of intact epidermis onto a sheet of clear plastic. Carrel and Hartmann first described this technique in 1916 [1]. The area inside the tracing can then be quantified by overlaying the tracing on grid paper. Alternatively, the plastic itself can be imprinted with a precise grid. By counting the number of squares (whose area is known) that are contained inside the tracing, an acceptably accurate area measurement can be obtained. Several authors [2], [3], [4], [5] have established the reliability and cost-effectiveness of this technique.
With the increasing popularity of computers in medical practice, several companies have developed computer-assisted wound measurement systems. Computers have been used to analyze photographic wound images, direct wound tracings and structured light deformations as a means to assess wound surface area and/or volume. These myriad techniques have all met with an acceptable level of reliability [3], [4], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. Recently, computer-assisted wound measurement systems, which use non-proprietary hardware and run the Windows ’95 operating system, have become commercially available. While these systems are increasing in popularity, their reliability in assessing wound surface area has not been established in the literature. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare digital videometry to standard acetate tracing in order to determine if measurements obtained using these techniques are statistically similar.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
This prospective study utilized four clinician raters. Using a repeated measures design, each rater measured the surface area of five wounds using three measurement techniques. The wounds were of various shapes and sizes and were artificially created on cadaver specimens with the use of a #10 scalpel blade. Prior to measuring the wounds, the raters were given a 30-min training session on the proper technique to use when measuring the wounds. The training session was given to all raters at the
Results
The mean areas of each of the five wounds after a total of 20 measurements (five measurements by each of four clinician raters) are presented in Fig. 3. Correlation between the measurement systems for all raters combined yielded Pearson r values of 0.93 for ruler and acetate, 0.95 for ruler and digital and 0.97 for acetate and digital. Correlations between measurement systems for each rater individually are summarized in Table 1. Repeated measures of ANOVA were each statistically significant
Discussion
The results of this study suggest that wound measurements obtained using digital videometry and those obtained by acetate tracing are very similar. When taking into account the strength of agreement relative to variability, acetate tracing and digital videometry showed the best correlation of any two techniques tested (ICC=0.94). Either technique could be used with confidence in a research or clinical setting. The measurements obtained using the ruler did not correlate well with either acetate
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Robert Wood, S. Khalid Husain, and Susan Stacpoole-Shea for their assistance in this project.
References (14)
- et al.
Measuring leg ulcers: practice considerations
Appl. Nurs. Res.
(1996) - et al.
The relation between the size of a wound and the rate of its cicatrization
J. Exp. Med.
(1916) - et al.
Documentation of wound surface area from tracings of wound perimeters
Phys. Ther.
(1983) Reliability of wound surface area measurements
Phys. Ther.
(1992)- et al.
The healing wound: a comparison of three clinically useful methods of measurement
Decubitus
(1990) - et al.
Comparison of two devices for wound measurement
Dermatol. Nurs.
(1993) - et al.
Direct method of measuring venous ulcers
Br. J. Surg.
(1989)
Cited by (34)
Electrospinning of biomimetic materials with fibrinogen for effective early-stage wound healing.
2024, International Journal of Biological MacromoleculesAssessment: Cornerstone in Wound Management
2015, Journal of the American College of SurgeonsCitation Excerpt :The software automatically calculates the area of the wound and it can be used to measure length, width, and even some characteristics of the wound bed. This technique provides us with the exact size of the wound, it is noninvasive, and the picture can be pasted onto the file to keep better control.28–30 Electronic wound measurement and documentation devices are now available commercially.
Quality of Life in Healing Diabetic Wounds: Does the End Justify the Means?
2008, Journal of Foot and Ankle SurgeryCitation Excerpt :After initiation of the offloading intervention, each patient was evaluated on a weekly basis for device inspection and DNFU wound care. Wounds were surgically debrided at the discretion of the investigator at each visit, and the index wound was measured using a computerized planimetric video wound measurement system (19). Patients were treated until their wound was healed (defined as complete epithelialization) or at 12 weeks, whichever came first.
Effects of local infiltration of peripheral blood mononuclear cells with phonophoresis on wound healing in dogs
2023, Indian Journal of Animal SciencesThree-Dimensional Wound Reconstruction using Point Descriptors: A Comparative Study
2023, Proceedings - IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical SystemsAutologous platelet-rich fibrin promotes wound healing in cats
2023, Frontiers in Veterinary Science