Trends in Genetics
Volume 17, Issue 4, 1 April 2001, Pages 172-175
Journal home page for Trends in Genetics

Research update
Why do genes have introns? Recombination might add a new piece to the puzzle

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9525(01)02236-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Much progress has been made recently regarding when and how spliceosomal introns invaded eukaryotic genomes. Although the ‘intron early–intron late’ debate seems to be settled, the original and essential question remains: why have introns at all – do they have a purpose? Analyses of the relationship between intron length and recombination in Drosophila shed new light on the forces that drive the evolution of introns. Comeron and Kreitman proposed recently that introns are advantageous because they enhance within-gene recombination and therefore increase selection efficacy (Hill–Robertson effects). However, their observations can also be explained by alternative neutralist models.

Section snippets

The evolution of introns

Thanks to the data generated by genome projects, large-scale inter- and intra-genomic comparative analyses are now feasible. Because the cost incurred by an intron is expected to be proportional to its size, the analysis of the factors that affect intron size should help to understand whether their evolution is governed by selection and, if so, how. Notably, population genetics models predict that, all else being equal, the efficacy of natural selection is decreased in regions of low

Conclusion

In conclusion, the present data do not allow the teasing apart of the selectionist and neutralist models for the evolution of intron size in Drosophila. It is possible that variations of intron length within and between genomes essentially reflect differences in the dynamic equilibrium between rare TE insertions and frequent, but short, base deletions rather than variations in selective pressure. Although it remains speculative, the model of Comeron and Kreitman is attractive. It is generally

References (22)

  • J.M. Logsdon

    The recent origin of spliceosomal introns revisited

    Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.

    (1998)
  • T. Cavalier-Smith

    Intron phylogeny: a new hypothesis

    Trends Genet.

    (1991)
  • J. Hanke

    Alternative splicing of human genes: more the rule than the exception?

    Trends Genet.

    (1999)
  • N.J. Dibb

    Why do genes have introns?

    FEBS Lett.

    (1993)
  • N.G.C. Smith et al.

    Sensitivity of patterns of molecular evolution to alterations in methodology: a critique of Hughes and Yeager

    J. Mol. Evol.

    (1998)
  • L. Duret et al.

    Searching for regulatory elements in human noncoding sequences

    Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.

    (1997)
  • M.W. Smith

    Structure of vertebrate genes: a statistical analysis implicating selection

    J. Mol. Evol.

    (1988)
  • G. Maroni

    The organization of Drosophila genes

    DNA Seq.

    (1994)
  • E.S. Maxwell et al.

    The small nucleolar RNAs

    Annu. Rev. Biochem.

    (1995)
  • M.C. Kricker

    Duplication-targeted DNA methylation and mutagenesis in the evolution of eukaryotic chromosomes

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

    (1992)
  • W.G. Hill et al.

    The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection

    Genet. Res.

    (1966)
  • Cited by (78)

    • Potential relations between post-spliced introns and mature mRNAs in the Caenorhabditis elegans genome

      2019, Journal of Theoretical Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Since circular RNAs (circRNA) were discovered, an exon-circRNA model has been formed by lariat-driven cyclization and intron-paired cyclization (Salzman et al., 2012; Hansen et al., 2011; Memczak et al., 2013), and circular RNA was found to be formed by introns as well (Jeck et al., 2013). In fact, intron loss/gain does affect gene expression after splicing, and plays a very important role in the evolution of eukaryotic genome, and even generating new species (Duret, 2001; Halligan and Keightley, 2006). Many studies have shown that introns can effected mRNA dynamic structures, mRNA transport, nuclear export and mRNA translation, but it is unclear how introns participate in these biological processes.

    • Fatty acid binding protein regulate antimicrobial function via Toll signaling in Chinese mitten crab

      2017, Fish and Shellfish Immunology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, the lengths of exons are relatively stable, however, unlike exons the length of introns is not conserved. The intron lengths vary greatly in size, this may be driven natural selection since long introns could enhance gene recombination and introduce mutations into adjacent exons [53,54]. Studies have found that expression of several invertebrates FABPs varies during immune response.

    • The evolution mechanism of intron length

      2016, Genomics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Introns are the crucial factor in mRNA processing. As far as introns are concerned, whether they exist or not makes some difference to intragenic recombination and ncRNA heteromorphosis, which is a main part for them to effect on the evolution of eukaryotic genomes [3–6]. Intron mutation can cause many diseases [7,8].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text