Original contribution
Critical care air transportation of the severely injured: Does long distance transport adversely affect survival?

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(05)81803-7Get rights and content

Civilian aeromedical transportation systems, both fixed and rotary wing, have proliferated since the middle 1970s. However, outcome data substantiating the benefit of these services have been slow in coming. From February 22, 1982, through March 5, 1984, Airlift Northwest transported 118 trauma patients (aged 15 years and older) an average distance of 340 miles (range, 100 to 800 miles) with fixed-wing aircraft. The in-hospital mortality for this group was 19% compared with 18% for a comparable group of trauma patients who were ground-transported from within the city limits of Seattle, Washington. The two groups did not differ significantly in age, Injury Severity Score, or Glasgow Coma Score. These results suggest that some part of the clinical benefit of a regional trauma center may be extended up to 800 miles with no increase in transport-related mortality.

References (17)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (27)

  • The soft skills emergency management that matters at the hardest time: A phenomenology study of healthcare worker's experiences during Kelantan flood 2014

    2022, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
    Citation Excerpt :

    The challenges begin at the point of making the decision via triaging and choosing the most critical patient but safe to be transported. Even in a normal circumstance, any critically ill patient is subjected to increased risk of mortality and morbidity during the transport [5,6] and the risk was much greater during a flood disaster. Furthermore, it was highlighted in one study that accompanying personnel is warranted and should at least be a physician or paramedics [5] yet in these circumstances this study clearly had shown that every healthcare worker, especially medical officers were much more needed at the affected hospital instead.

  • Impact of physician-less pediatric critical care transport: Making a decision on team composition

    2018, Journal of Critical Care
    Citation Excerpt :

    Our cohort did not capture and include those patients that the PICU transport team did not transport, e.g., patients who died before or without referral calls, or were transported by a non-PICU transport team such as an ALS team (paramedics). There is also a possibility that patients from hospitals that are a shorter distance from the STOL might have been transported more often by the ALS team, particularly when the transport time was critical (e.g., trauma cases) [29-31]. Second, the distance or the transport time could also have been a factor in the decision-making of upper airway security (transport with or without endotracheal intubation) for a given transport.

  • Aeromedical Retrieval for Critical Clinical Conditions: 12 Years of Experience with the Royal Flying Doctor Service, Queensland, Australia

    2009, Journal of Emergency Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    For example, the US military utilizes fixed-wing aeromedical retrieval for intercontinental transport to definitive care (5,6). A 1990 study found that in-hospital mortality for fixed-wing aeromedical retrieval of trauma up to 800 miles was found to be not statistically different to in-city ground transport of clinically similar patients (7). However, there are few objective studies that detail the full spectrum of fixed-wing aeromedical retrieval, although there are studies that focus on specific patient populations such as Obstetrics, Pediatrics, or only one aspect of these transports, such as repatriation (8–10).

  • The role of transport intervals in outcomes for critically ill patients who are transferred to referral centers

    2008, Journal of Critical Care
    Citation Excerpt :

    Interestingly, this effect influences ICU/CCU length of stay but not hospital length of stay. Although reports of successful transportation of critically ill and injured patients over long distances and for prolonged periods [20,22] have been published, other studies have found longer distance traveled to be an independent prognostic factor for adverse outcome [9]. Another possible explanation for this association may be that more time is required to arrange for air transport from referral ICUs back to hospitals in their home communities when these communities are further away from the receiving hospital.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text