Elsevier

Vaccine

Volume 20, Issues 27–28, 10 September 2002, Pages 3304-3309
Vaccine

Protection against tetanus toxin after intragastric administration of two recombinant lactic acid bacteria: impact of strain viability and in vivo persistence

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00301-8Get rights and content

Abstract

Non-pathogenic lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are attractive as live carriers to deliver protective antigens to the mucosal immune system. Both persisting and non-persisting strains of lactic acid bacteria have been evaluated and seem to work equally well by the systemic and nasal routes of administration. However, it is not known if persistence and viability of the strain play a critical role when immunizing by the oral route. To address this question, recombinant LAB strains, able to persist (Lactobacillus plantarum NCIMB8826/pMEC127) or not (Lactococcus lactis MG1363/pMEC46) in the gastro-intestinal tract of mice and producing equivalent amounts of the tetanus toxin fragment C (TTFC) were compared to each other. A very strong ELISA TTFC-specific and protective humoral response was elicited by either live or UV-inactivated recombinant Lb. plantarum strains. In a similar protocol, recombinant Lc. lactis seemed to be somewhat less efficient than the former host. It is thus tempting to propose that the difference in the capacity of the bacterial vector to persist in the gastro-intestinal tract impacts on its immunogenicity and on the level of protection it may induce. Protection was slightly superior after administration of live strains.

Introduction

The potential of live recombinant lactic acid bacteria (LAB) to deliver heterologous antigens to the mucosal immune system has been investigated during the last decade [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. This approach offers a number of advantages over the traditional parenteral vaccination, such as non-invasiveness and the possibility to elicit both systemic and mucosal immune responses. In addition, these Gram-positive non-pathogenic bacterial vectors are generally regarded as safe [8]. They represent an original alternative to the use of attenuated pathogenic bacterial carriers such as Salmonella, Bordetella, Vibrio and Mycobacterium [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. The LAB are mostly known for their widespread use as starter strains in the food and feed industry, but also for the probiotic effects that certain species or strains may exert in humans or animals [15], [16]. Several LAB strains are quite acid resistant and should thus be able to effectively survive passage through the stomach. This property is however species- and strain-dependent. For example, Lactobacillus plantarum NCIMB8826 exhibited a higher and longer survival in the human gastro-intestinal tract than Lactococcus lactis MG1363, when fed to healthy subjects [17]. The authors concluded that the pharmacokinetic properties of Lb. plantarum are promising for its development as vaccine vehicle. In addition, given LAB strains, mostly belonging to the Lactobacillus genus, are able to persist in mucosal cavities such as the mouth, the urogenital or the gastro-intestinal tract. Their development as vaccine has included the use of both non-colonizing (Lc. lactis) [1], [2] and colonizing (S. gordonii, Lactobacillus spp.) [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [18] strains. A number of antigens have been efficiently produced in both systems, but the most complete immunological studies have been performed with the tetanus toxin fragment C (TTFC) as model antigen. Recombinant strains producing this model antigen were shown to induce high protective local and systemic antibody responses as well as cellular immune responses, after parenteral and intranasal immunizations [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [18]. While both gut colonizers and non-colonizers seem to work equally well by these routes, the importance of colonization or persistence in oral administration remains poorly investigated. To address this question, we have undertaken a comparative study of the immunogenicity of recombinant lactobacilli (Lb. plantarum) and lactococci (Lc. lactis) producing equivalent levels of TTFC, by oral (intragastric) immunization. Moreover, the immune responses elicited by live and inactivated recombinant LAB were compared.

Section snippets

Bacterial strains and culture conditions

All LAB strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. The recombinant strain of Lc. lactis MG1363 synthesizing cytoplasmic TTFC was constructed using the replicative pMEC46 plasmid in which the heterologous gene is under the control of the nisin (pnisA) inducible promoter as previously described [19], [20]. Lb. plantarum NCIMB8826 and Lc. lactis MG1363 strains harboring the cloning vectors pTG2247 [19] and pTX [1], respectively, were used as control strains.

Lb. plantarum was grown at 37 °C

TTFC production by the recombinant Lb. plantarum and Lc. lactis strains

To estimate the TTFC amount contained in the different inocula, cells extracts corresponding to 1:10 of the bacterial dose (108 cfu) were analyzed by immunoblotting. As shown in Fig. 1, a specific signal at the expected molecular mass (47 kDa) was detected for both TTFC-producing strains. As previously described [7], TTFC production was notably higher in the Lb. plantarum NCIMB8826 (pMEC127) than in the NCIMB8826 (pMEC4) strain. The level of antigen production was found similar and very high

Discussion

Recombinant lactobacilli were previously shown to induce both systemic and local immune responses after intranasal immunization [6]. In a limited number of experiments, these results were extended to the intragastric route [5], [7]. In the present work, we evaluated the impact of the persistence capacity of two lactic acid bacterial vectors on the immunogenicity and protective activity after intragastric administration. To address this point, we compared the strain Lb. plantarum NCIMB8826 as a

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the EU BIO4-CT96-0542 grant, the Institut Pasteur de Lille, the Institut Pasteur de Bruxelles and FEDER funds. We are grateful to E. Van Nerom and F. Tweepenninckx for their skillful help with protection experiments. We very much appreciated the stimulating discussions with J. Delcour, P. Hols, and J.M. Wells. Rabbit anti-TTFC antibodies were kindly supplied by Dr. E. Sablon, Innogenetics N.V., Belgium.

References (22)

  • S.N. Chatfield et al.

    Use of the nirB promoter to direct the stable expression of heterologous antigens in Salmonella oral vaccine strains: development of a single-dose oral tetanus toxin vaccine

    Biotechnology

    (1992)
  • Cited by (93)

    • Recombinant Lactic Acid Bacteria Secreting OxdC as a Novel Therapeutic Tool for the Prevention of Kidney Stone Disease

      2017, Multifunctional Systems for Combined Delivery, Biosensing and Diagnostics
    • Oral immunization of mice against Clostridium perfringens epsilon toxin with a Lactobacillus casei vector vaccine expressing epsilon toxoid

      2016, Infection, Genetics and Evolution
      Citation Excerpt :

      Different bacteria have been used such as L. casei (Song et al., 2014; Li et al., 2009), Salmonella enterica (Kulkarni et al., 2008, 2010; Zekarias et al., 2008), and Bacillus subtilis (Hoang et al., 2008) as the antigen delivery systems. L. casei has the potential immune-modulatory properties and is widely used for expressing several heterologous antigens as vaccines in animal models with promising results (Campos et al., 2008; Maassen et al., 1999; Adachi et al., 2010; Ferreira et al., 2009; Grangette et al., 2002; Lee et al., 2006; Oliveira et al., 2006; Wen et al., 2012; Yoon et al., 2012). To our best knowledge, the current study is the first description for showing an effective immunity response for ε-toxoid of C. perfringens following oral administrative of this L. casei-based vaccine.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text