Elsevier

Social Science & Medicine

Volume 45, Issue 8, October 1997, Pages 1289-1297
Social Science & Medicine

General Paper
Valuing health status using VAS and TTO: What lies behind the numbers?

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(97)00057-9Get rights and content

Abstract

It is well known that different methods of eliciting the valuations attached to various health states, such as the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Time Trade Off (TTO), yield different results. This study gathers qualitative data from a group of 43 respondents who had previously taken part in a large scale national study which set out to elicit the values attached by individuals to various health states using both the VAS and the TTO techniques. The findings of this study raised three questions which are of particular interest here: (1) Why are some states that are rated better than dead on the VAS often rated as worse than dead in TTO? (2) Why are some respondents unwilling to trade off any time at all in order to avoid a health state that they place below full health on the VAS? (3) Why are TTO valuations of older respondents for the more severe health states lower than those of the younger age groups? This study has uncovered qualitative evidence on each of these three key issues. Regarding the first question, many respondents did not appear to interpret a better than dead VAS score as a strict preference for spending 10 years in a health state over immediate death. Several different factors appeared to contribute towards this, an important one being the tendency of respondents to ignore the duration of the health state during the VAS task. Regarding the second question, there is evidence of the existence of a “threshold of tolerability” below which states would have to fall before some respondents would be willing to give up any time at all on the TTO. Regarding the last question, it appears that older respondents are less likely to find the worse than dead TTO scenario plausible than those in the younger age groups. However, whilst this may explain why older respondents attach lower worse than dead valuations to health states, it does not appear to account for the entire difference in TTO valuations between the two age groups. In addition, it appears that older respondents may be less prepared to live for the next 10 years in a diminished health state.

References (16)

  • G.W. Torrance

    Social preferences for health states: an empirical evaluation of three measurement techniques

    Socio-Economic Planning Sciences

    (1976)
  • G.W. Torrance

    Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal: a review

    Journal of Health Economics

    (1986)
  • C. Bombardier et al.

    Comparison of three preference measurement methodologies in the evaluation of a functional status index

  • D.N. Churchill et al.

    Measurement of quality of life in end stage renal disease: the time trade-off approach

    Clinical and Investigative Medicine

    (1987)
  • P. Dolan et al.

    The time trade-off method: results from a general population study

    Health Economics

    (1996)
  • EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life

    Health Policy

    (1990)
  • B. Fischhoff et al.

    Embedding effects: stimulus representation and response mode

    Journal of Risk and Uncertainty

    (1993)
  • C. Gudex et al.

    Valuing health states: interviews with the general public

    European Journal of Public Health

    (1996)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (134)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text