Evolving significance of prognostic markers associated with new treatment strategies in neuroblastoma
Introduction
Clinical observations throughout the last 15 years at MSKCC and world-wide support the separation of neuroblatoma (NB) into at least three distinct biologic groups, i.e. metastatic stage 4 in >1 year of age, infant stage 4, and non-stage 4 (International Neuroblastoma Staging System (INSS) stages 1, 2, 3 and 4s). Because of the striking differences in the natural history of these clinical subgroups of NB, and the radically different approaches for each, prognostic markers are most meaningful when analyzed within individual clinical categories. Furthermore, when challenged by improving outcome, the clinical utility of individual clinical and genetic features deserves constant reevaluation.
It is generally believed that the diverse clinical behaviors of NB result from the capacity of these tumors to exploit their genetic malleability to evolve and adapt. NB is a genetically heterogeneous neoplasia and intratumoral heterogeneity and clonal evolution have been shown to be a frequent occurrence [1]. Study of the molecular genetics of NB has elucidated several non-random genetic events associated with the disease: allelic losses on chromosomes 1p, 11q, 14q, 9p, 9q, 2q, 3p, 4p and 18q implicating putative tumor suppressor genes; allelic gains on chromosomes 17q, 18q, 1q, 7 and 5q, some related to growth control genes; amplification of the oncogene MYCN; and changes in the normal diploid chromosomal content [2]. The clinical importance of each of these genetic events and their evolution during tumor progression are, however, largely unknown. Except for MYCN status, the relationship of each of these individual genetic events to the clinical course of NB has not been firmly established. Furthermore, although some are strongly associated with survival or progression-free survival for NB as a whole, their significance for individual categories of NB as described above remains unclear. Thus, their utility remains uncertain in the management of individual patients.
We carried out a retrospective analysis of archived tumor specimens from patients with neuroblastoma treated at MSKCC. We studied the prognostic importance of biologic markers within each clinical group and attempted to define the genetic-molecular profile of metastatic versus local-regional NB.
Section snippets
Local-regional or non-metastatic neuroblastoma
More than one third of NB cases present without distant metastasis and clinical experience has shown that cytotoxic therapy generally has not altered the natural history [3]. The importance of individual biological markers in predicting the clinical behavior of local-regional (LR) NB is often confounded by stratification and therapy.
In a restrospective analysis of archived samples 57 tumors from 46 patients were studied. These patients were diagnosed with LR NB and managed conservatively and
Metastatic or stage 4 neuroblastoma
At least 50% NB do not undergo spontaneous regression or maturation, but present as advanced stage tumors (INSS Stage 4) that initially respond to radio and chemotherapy but frequently recur and become progressively resistant to medical treatment. Biological studies on stage 4 primary tumors are becoming difficult to perform because many if not all cases are diagnosed based on bone marrow examination and elevated urine catecholamines without biopsy of the primary tumor. A genetic profile for
Acknowledgements
We thank Lishi Chen, Sandra Levcovici, Muzzafar Akram, and Miguel Alaminos for technical assistance. This study was supported in part by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Young Investigator Award 2000 (J.M.), the JP's Wish Fund, the Katie-Find-a-Cure Fund, the Katie Hoch Foundation and Pediatric Cancer Foundation of New York. Jaume Mora is an ASCO 2001 Career Development Award (CDA) recipient and the Translational and Integrative Medicine Research Fund at MSKCC.
References (15)
- et al.
Genetic heterogeneity and clonal evolution in neuroblastoma
Br. J. Cancer
(2001) - et al.
Molecular biology of neuroblastoma
J. Clin. Oncol.
(1999) - et al.
Survival from locally invasive or widespread neuroblastoma without cytotoxic therapy
J. Clin. Oncol.
(1996) - et al.
Survival analysis of clinical, pathologic and genetic features in neuroblastoma presenting as local-regional disease
Cancer
(2001) - et al.
Schwannian cells of neuroblastoma are derived from a tumoral cell progenitor
Cancer Res.
(2001) - et al.
Pattern of DNA segregation in multipolar anatelophases of different ploidy in euploid and aneuploid mammalian cells cultivated in vitro
Genetica
(1972) - et al.
Novel regions of allelic imbalance identified by genome-wide analysis of neuroblastoma
Cancer Res.
(2002)
Cited by (28)
Biopsy Techniques for Children with Cancer
2012, Pediatric Surgery, 2-Volume Set: Expert Consult - Online and PrintBiopsy Techniques for Children with Cancer
2012, Pediatric SurgeryGenetic alterations in neuroblastoma and their usefulness for clinical management
2011, Bulletin du CancerBiopsy Techniques for Children with Cancer
2006, Pediatric Surgery: Sixth EditionA retrospective evaluation of the presentation, prognostic factors and outcomes of neuroblastoma in Ugandan children
2023, Pediatric Hematology and Oncology