New anti-huntingtin monoclonal antibodies: implications for huntingtin conformation and its binding proteins
Introduction
Huntington’s disease (HD) is caused by the extension of a polyglutamine (polyQ) tract in the protein huntingtin (Htt) to a length >40 units [20]. Immunohistochemistry and subcellular fractionation indicate that Htt is normally located in the cytoplasm while the mutant form of Htt is also found in aggregates (inclusions) in the nucleus [4]. While this correlation with the disease suggests that translocation and/or aggregation in the nucleus is important for the neuronal cell death that occurs in HD, the importance of the inclusions themselves remains controversial [13]. A related question concerns the binding partners for Htt in the nucleus and the cytoplasm. Studies in yeast, Drosophila and mammalian cells have shown that various chaperone proteins can alter nuclear inclusion formation and/or the toxicity associated with expanded polyQ repeat Htt (as well as ataxin-3, another protein that causes neurodegenerative disease when its polyQ tract is extended) [4]. Other proteins also bind Htt and ataxin-3, which can lead to alterations in transcription 1, 12, 25. Regarding its normal function, Htt has been localized to various subcellular sites, including the neuronal cytoplasm, nucleus, presynaptic vesicles, varicosities, Golgi network, dendritic plasma membranes, and cytoskeleton [20]. Although it is not yet clear how much of this diversity in reported localization is genuine, it would not be surprising if a protein of >3,000 amino acids had multiple functions and sites of action [8], as well as many different binding partners in various locations.
Critical tools in many of such studies are anti-Htt antibodies, which can be used for immunohistochemistry, immunoprecipitation, structural studies, drug screening, and functional perturbation. Seeking to broaden the range of available anti-Htt monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), and to clarify the subcellular localization of Htt, we have produced eight new mAbs. We used as antigens several expanded polyQ constructs, including soluble Htt exon 1, as well as aggregates of Htt. Some of these mAbs display distinct immunohistochemical staining patterns not seen in prior studies. Coupled with Western blotting results, these staining patterns suggest that the conformation and/or the binding partners of Htt are different in various subcellular compartments and when it forms nuclear inclusions.
Section snippets
Production of mAbs
Six-week-old Balb/c female mice were primed and boosted at 2 week intervals by intraperitoneal injection of antigen emulsified in adjuvant (RIBI Immunochem, Hamilton, MT, USA). Test bleeds were obtained 7 days after every other injection. A final series of boosts was performed without adjuvant. Spleen cells were isolated from the mouse 3 days after the final boost and fused with HL-1 murine myeloma cells (Ventrex, Portland, ME, USA) using polyethylene glycol (PEG 1500, Boehringer-Mannheim,
Generation of the mAbs
For the first round of immunizations, we injected proteins expressed from two constructs containing the polyQ domain (19 or 35 repeats) and 34 amino acids of the dentatorubralpalliodoluysian atrophy (DRPLA) gene fused to glutathione-S-transferase (GST) [16]. Using enzyme linked substrate assay (ELISA) to screen against these antigens versus GST alone, we selected three hybridomas for cloning. These mAbs are termed MW (for Milton Wexler) 1, 2, and 5. As described below, while each of these mAbs
Acknowledgements
We thank James Burke, Marie-Francoise Chesselet, Vivian Hook, George Jackson, Parsa Kazemi-Esfarjani, Alex Kanzantsev, Ali Khoshnan, George Lawless, Marcy MacDonald, Hemachandro Reddy, Allan Sharp, Gabriele Shilling, Peter Snow, Leslie Thompson, Peter Thumfort, Jonathon Wood, and Scott Zeitlin for generously providing antibodies, cell lines, mouse tissues, and DNA constructs. Peter Snow expressed proteins and Peter Thumfort generously provided the peptide arrays and advice on epitope mapping.
References (31)
Transcriptional dysregulation in Huntington’s disease
Trends Neurosci.
(2000)- et al.
Twisting into shape
Curr. Biol.
(1992) - et al.
Formation of neuronal intranuclear inclusions underlies the neurological dysfunction in mice transgenic for the HD mutation
Cell
(1997) - et al.
Polyglutamine expansionsProteolysis, chaperones, and the dangers of promiscuity
Neuron
(2000) - et al.
HuntingtinA single bait hooks many species
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
(1998) - et al.
Tolerization of adult mice to immunodominant proteins before monoclonal antibody production
J. Immunol. Methods
(1999) - et al.
Expanding our understanding of polyglutamine diseases through mouse models
Neuron
(1999) - et al.
Exon 1 of the HD gene with an expanded CAG repeat is sufficient to cause a progressive neurological phenotype in transgenic mice
Cell
(1996) - et al.
Decrease in striatal enkephalin mRNA in mouse models of Huntington’s disease
Exp. Neurol.
(2000) - et al.
Toxicity of expanded polyglutamine-domain proteins in Escherichia coli
FEBS Lett.
(1996)
Recent advances in understanding the pathogenesis of Huntington’s disease
Trends Neurosci.
Nuclear accumulation of truncated atrophin-1 fragments in a transgenic mouse model of DRPLA
Neuron
Huntington’s disease intranuclear inclusions contain truncated, ubiquinated huntingtin protein
Exp. Neurol.
SH3GL3 associates with the Huntington exon 1 protein and promotes the formation of polygln-containing protein aggregates
Mol. Cell
Huntington’s diseaseThe challenge for cell biologists
Trends Cell. Biol.
Cited by (151)
RNA-mediated pathogenic mechanisms in Huntington's disease
2024, Huntington's Disease: Pathogenic Mechanisms and Implications for TherapeuticsMolecular basis of Q-length selectivity for the MW1 antibody–huntingtin interaction
2023, Journal of Biological ChemistryStructural Model of the Proline-Rich Domain of Huntingtin Exon-1 Fibrils
2020, Biophysical Journal