Military training-related injuries: Surveillance, research, and prevention

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00114-8Get rights and content

Abstract

Background: Musculoskeletal physical training-related injuries are a major problem in military populations. Injuries are important in terms of loss of time from work and training and decreased military readiness. The implications of these injuries in terms of patient morbidity, attrition rates, and training costs for military personnel are staggering. This article reviews: (1) pertinent epidemiologic literature on musculoskeletal injury rates; (2) injury type and location; and (3) risk factors for military populations. Suggestions for injury surveillance and prevention are also offered.

Methods: Existing military and civilian epidemiologic studies were used to estimate and compare the size of the injury problem, identify risk factors, and test preventive measures. Most of the military research data obtained was from Marine and Army recruits, Army Infantry soldiers, and Naval Special Warfare candidates. Additional studies conducted in operational forces provided documentation of the injury problem in these populations as well.

Results: Injury rates during military training are high, ranging from 6 to 12 per 100 male recruits per month during basic training to as high as 30 per 100 per month for Naval Special Warfare training. Data collected show a wide variation in injury rates that are dependent largely on the following risk factors: low levels of current physical fitness, low levels of previous occupational and leisure time physical activity, previous injury history, high running mileage, high amount of weekly exercise, smoking, age, and biomechanical factors. (Data are contradictory with respect to age.)

Conclusion: Considering the magnitude of training injuries in military populations, there is a substantial amount of work that remains to be performed, especially in the areas of surveillance, prevention, and treatment. Modifiable risk factors have been identified suggesting that overuse and other training injuries could be decreased with proper interventions. Outpatient surveillance systems are available to capture musculoskeletal injury data but need to be refined. Given the size of the problem, a systematic process of prevention should be initiated starting with routine surveillance to identify high-risk populations for the purpose of prioritizing research and prevention. Properly planned interventions should then be implemented with the expectation of dramatically reduced lost work/training time, attrition, and medical costs, while increasing military readiness.

Introduction

Musculoskeletal injuries are a major problem in military populations. This category of injuries is treated primarily on an outpatient basis. Unfortunately, Department of Defense (DoD) service-wide outpatient surveillance data have only recently become available. Therefore, we must rely on existing epidemiologic studies to estimate the size of the problem, identify risk factors, and begin to propose and test preventive measures. Most of the research has been conducted on Marine and Army trainees. Army infantry soldiers, Navy special forces, and some others have also been studied. Risk factors have been identified that are amenable to intervention. However, few intervention trials have been undertaken. Outpatient surveillance systems capable of capturing cause-of-injury data have been recently developed to obtain a research-based musculoskeletal injury database in select military populations. The success of these systems suggests that simple surveillance tools can provide important data.

This paper reviews the pertinent epidemiologic literature on musculoskeletal injury rates, injury type, and location and risk factors for military populations. It also provides suggestions for injury prevention.

Section snippets

Methods

Information presented to the Armed Forces Epidemiological Board’s (AFEB) Injury Control Work Group by scientists from the Navy and Army research organizations was evaluated. In addition, existing published military and civilian epidemiologic studies were used to estimate and compare the size of the problem, identify risk factors, and identify tested preventive measures. The research reviewed pertained primarily to Marine and Army recruits, Army infantry soldiers, and Naval Special Warfare

Prevention strategies

Preventive strategies should be directed at the primary factors contributing to risks for musculoskeletal injuries, such as the amount and level of intensity of the training, levels of physical fitness, and possibly equipment (e.g., footwear).

The specific approach to achieving higher levels of physical fitness while minimizing injury rates depends on the particular populations being considered. For example, with military recruits there is limited access prior to arrival to boot camp. Therefore,

Outpatient surveillance systems

Unlike inpatient clinical events that have been maintained in standardized tri-service databases for almost a decade, comprehensive outpatient surveillance systems such as the Sports Medicine Research Team System (SMARTS) or the DoD Ambulatory Data System (ADS) are a more recent development.

The Naval Health Research Center has developed SMARTS, a PC-based software application for the purpose of supporting epidemiologic research in musculoskeletal injuries.59 The system has features of both

Summary

Research suggests that musculoskeletal injuries are a significant problem in the military. Although the majority of studies have been conducted in military recruit training populations, studies conducted in operational forces provide documentation that there is a large problem in these populations as well. Data reviewed show a wide variation in injury rates between military units studied, probably varying according to the types and amounts of training performed. Military research has identified

Suggested readings

  • Bensel CK, Kish RN. Lower extremity disorders among men and women in Army basic training and effects of two types of boots. Natick, MA: U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, 1983 (NATICK/TR-83/026).

  • Hoeberigs JH. Factors related to the incidence of running injuries: a review. Sports Med 1992;13:408–22.

  • Jones BH. Overuse injuries of the lower extremities associated with marching, jogging, and running: a review. Mil Med 1983;148:783–7.

  • Jones BH, Harris JM, Vinh TN, Rubin C.

Acknowledgements

The views, opinions, and findings contained in this report are those of the authors and should not be construed as official Department of the Navy or DoD position, policy, or decision, unless so designated by other official documentation. The authors thank Barbara Iverson-Literski for careful manuscript preparation.

References (59)

  • N.S Bell et al.

    High injury rates among female Army traineesa function of gender?

    Am J Prev Med

    (2000)
  • K.L Reynolds et al.

    Cigarette smoking, physical fitness, and injuries in infantry soldiers

    Am J Prev Med

    (1994)
  • D.J Davison

    A review of parachuting injuries

    Injury

    (1990)
  • B.H Jones et al.

    Intrinsic risk factors for exercise-related injuries among male and female Army trainees

    Am J Sports Med

    (1993)
  • J.P Tomlinson et al.

    Risk of injury in soldiers

    Mil Med

    (1987)
  • J Knapik et al.

    Physical fitness, age, and injury incidence in infantry soldiers

    J Occup Med

    (1993)
  • J.M Linenger et al.

    Musculoskeletal and medical morbidity associated with rigorous physical training

    Clin J Sports Med

    (1993)
  • D.J Riddell

    Changes in the incidence of medical conditions at the Commando Training Center, Royal Marines

    J Roy Nav Med Serv

    (1990)
  • K.A Reinker et al.

    A comparison of male and female orthopedic pathology in basic training

    Mil Med

    (1979)
  • D.M Kowal

    Nature and causes of injuries in women resulting from an endurance training program

    Am J Sports Med

    (1980)
  • B.H Jones et al.

    Associations among body composition, physical fitness, and injury in men and women Army trainees

  • B.H Jones et al.

    Epidemiology of injuries associated with physical training among young men in the Army

    Med Sci Sports Exer

    (1993)
  • S.A Almeida et al.

    Epidemiologic patterns of musculoskeletal injuries and physical training

    Med Sci Sports Exerc

    (1999)
  • K.R Kaufman et al.

    The relationship of foot structure and range of motion on musculoskeletal overuse injuries

    Am J Sports Med

    (1999)
  • R.A Shaffer et al.

    Epidemiology of illness and injury among U.S. Navy and Marine Corps female training population

    Mil Med

    (1999)
  • R.R Protzman et al.

    Comparative stress fracture incidence in males and females in an equal training environment

    Athletic Training

    (1977)
  • T.J Scully et al.

    Stress fracture—a preventable injury

    Mil Med

    (1982)
  • T.J Brudvig et al.

    Stress factors in 295 traineesa one-year study of incidence related to age, sex, and race

    Mil Med

    (1983)
  • L.I Gardner et al.

    Prevention of lower extremity stress fracturesa controlled trial of a shock absorbent insole

    Am J Pub Health

    (1988)
  • S Pester et al.

    Stress fractures in the lower extremities of soldiers in basic training

    Orthop Rev

    (1992)
  • A.C Winfield et al.

    Risk factors associated with stress reactions in female Marines

    Mil Med

    (1997)
  • R.A Shaffer et al.

    Use of simple measures of physical activity to predict stress fractures in young men undergoing a rigorous physical training program

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1999)
  • J.G Garrick et al.

    Injuries in high school sports

    Pediatrics

    (1978)
  • J.F Kraus et al.

    Mortality and morbidity from injuries in sports and recreation

    Ann Rev Pub Health

    (1984)
  • A.W.S Watson

    Incidence and nature of sports injuries in Irelandanalysis of four types of sport

    Am J Sports Med

    (1993)
  • B.E Lindblad et al.

    The socioeconomic consequences of sports injuries in Randers, Denmark

    Scand J Med Sci Sports

    (1991)
  • J.M Samet et al.

    Running-related morbiditya community survey

    Ann Sport Med

    (1982)
  • B Marti et al.

    On the epidemiology of running injuriesthe 1984 Bern Grand-Prix study

    Am J Sports Med

    (1988)
  • J.P Koplan et al.

    An epidemiologic study of the benefits and risks of running

    JAMA

    (1982)
  • Cited by (307)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text