Original articleMethodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: The lesson of Cronbach
References (21)
- et al.
A methodological framework for assessing health indices
J Chron Dis
(1985) - et al.
Estimating and testing an index of responsiveness and the relationship of the index to power
J Clin Epidemiol
(1991) - et al.
Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments
J Chron Dis
(1987) Issues in the use of change scores in randomized trials
J Clin Epidemiol
(1989)- et al.
Measurement of health status: Ascertaining the minimum clinically important difference
Controlled Clin Trials
(1989) - et al.
Responsiveness and validity in health status measurement: A clarification
J Clin Epidemiol
(1989) - et al.
Assessing responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: An analogy to diagnostic test performance
J Chronic Dis
(1986) The study of change in evaluation research: Principles concerning measurement, experimental design and analysis
- et al.
How should we measure “change” — Or should we?
Psychol Bull
(1970) - et al.
Comparative measurement efficiency and sensitivity of five health status instruments for arthritis research
Arthritis Rheumatism
(1985)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (443)
The smallest worthwhile effect is superior to the MCID for estimating acceptable benefits of knee arthroplasty
2022, Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyCommentary on finding meaning in patient-reported outcome change scores: a seemingly unquenchable thirst for understanding
2022, Osteoarthritis and CartilagePresent state bias in transition ratings was accurately estimated in simulated and real data
2022, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Copyright © 1997 Published by Elsevier Inc.