Amygdala–hippocampal shape differences in schizophrenia: the application of 3D shape models to volumetric MR data
Introduction
Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging studies of schizophrenia, which began only in 1984 (Smith et al., 1984), have evolved from the use of 1-cm slices that did not cover the whole brain to 1.5-mm slices of the entire brain (for a review, see Shenton et al., 1997, Shenton et al., 2001, McCarley et al., 1999). This improvement in spatial resolution was needed to analyze small brain changes between normal controls and schizophrenic patients. The volume reductions observed in schizophrenia are, in fact, relatively small, on the order of 10–20% difference from controls and, thus, improved measurement techniques were necessary before evidence could be accumulated to suggest small volume reductions in the brains of schizophrenic patients.
Such evidence has now accumulated and there has been a proliferation of MR studies documenting brain abnormalities in schizophrenia (e.g. Suddath et al., 1989, Suddath et al., 1990, Barta et al., 1990, Bogerts et al., 1990, Dauphinais et al., 1990, DeLisi et al., 1991, DeLisi et al., 1994, Shenton et al., 1992, Andreasen et al., 1994, Marsh et al., 1994, Marsh et al., 1997, Rossi et al., 1994a, Rossi et al., 1994b, Pearlson et al., 1997). In a recent review of the literature, the most robust MR findings in schizophrenia are: enlarged lateral ventricles (77% of studies); medial temporal lobe (amygdala–hippocampal complex and/or parahippocampal gyrus) volume reduction (77% of studies); and gray matter volume reduction of superior temporal gyrus (100% of studies) (see Shenton et al., 1997, Shenton et al., 2001, McCarley et al., 1999).1 There is also growing evidence to suggest that at least some structural brain abnormalities observed in schizophrenia are neurodevelopmental in origin. The general approach taken is to assume that if certain brain abnormalities could only have occurred during neurodevelopment, then an abnormal finding at a later stage of development confirms a neurodevelopmental origin for that brain abnormality (e.g. Frangou and Murray, 1996, Bartley et al., 1997). For example, the sulco-gyral patterns in the brain are largely formed during the third trimester (e.g. Chi et al., 1977, Sadler, 1981, Ono et al., 1990). Thus, abnormalities in the sulco-gyral pattern of the temporal lobe in schizophrenic patients, reported in both post-mortem (e.g. Southard, 1910, Southard, 1915, Brown et al., 1986, Jakob and Beckmann, 1986) and MR studies (e.g. Kikinis et al., 1994), suggest that such alterations are the result of neurodevelopmental abnormalities. A further example of a neurodevelopmental abnormality in schizophrenia is the cavum septum pellucidi (CSP). The CSP fuses in the latter part of neural development, and therefore a space, or ‘cavum’, observed likely reflects deviations in neurodevelopment (e.g. Shaw and Alvord, 1969, Lewis and Mezey, 1985, Rossi et al., 1989, Sarwar, 1989, Nopoulos et al., 1996, Nopoulos et al., 1997, Kwon et al., 1998). Of note, this fusion is thought to result from the rapid growth of the corpus callosum and the hippocampus, further suggesting that abnormalities in these two structures may be related, at least in part, to neurodevelopmental abnormalities (e.g. Rakic and Yakovlev, 1968). Data from our laboratory confirm an association between CSP and hippocampus; large CSP was highly correlated with reduced hippocampal volume in chronic patients (Kwon et al., 1998). (Parenthetically, the hippocampus can be affected by environmental events—see review and discussion in Gurvits et al., 1996, McEwen and Magarinos, 1997.) Additionally, planum temporale asymmetry, an important biological substrate of language, is established during neural development and it, too, has been shown to be abnormal in schizophrenia, again suggesting the importance of neurodevelopmental influences in the etiology of schizophrenia (e.g. DeLisi et al., 1994, Rossi et al., 1994a, Rossi et al., 1994a, Barta et al., 1995, Barta et al., 1997, Petty et al., 1995, Kwon et al., 1999).
Given the importance of neurodevelopmental influences in schizophrenia, it is of interest to note that most studies in schizophrenia have investigated area, volume and asymmetry, but fewer (e.g. Csernansky et al., 1998) have evaluated shape, which may be importantly linked to neurodevelopmental influences. For example, there is evidence to suggest that shape deformations may be associated with the physical properties of morphogenetic mechanisms that directly impact on the particular shape of brain regions during neurodevelopment (Van Essen, 1997, Van Essen and Drury, 1997, Van Essen et al., 1998). The physical tension of brain growth during neurodevelopment may lead to shape deformations that might be observed using shape measures of brain structures.
Thus, midbrain structures, likely implicated in schizophrenia which, as noted above, include both the hippocampus and corpus callosum, are important brain regions to investigate in schizophrenia as they may show shape deformations that reflect neurodevelopmental anomalies. A recent study by Thompson et al. (2000) further suggests the importance of patterns of brain growth and development, which takes place post-natally as well, and may lead to changes in volume, shape and asymmetry of brain structures in both normal and abnormal development.
In the current study, we investigated shape deformations in the amygdala–hippocampal complex in 15 male patients diagnosed with chronic schizophrenia, and 15 male controls, group matched for handedness, parental socioeconomic status and age.2 This brain region has figured prominently in many MR volume findings in schizophrenia (see reviews in Shenton et al., 1997, Shenton et al., 2001, McCarley et al., 1999), and, as noted previously, the posterior portion of the amygdala–hippocampal complex has been associated with large CSP in patients diagnosed with chronic schizophrenia (Kwon et al., 1998). This link further suggests an anomaly in neonatal development of midline brain structures. In the current study we focus on shape differences in the amygdala–hippocampal complex between groups.
Measures of shape are, nonetheless, complex. An entire field of computer science, in fact, has focused on quantitative descriptions of the shape of objects (e.g. Van Essen and Maunsell, 1980, Caviness et al., 1988, Kass et al., 1988, Bajcsy and Kovacic, 1989, Bookstein, 1989, Bookstein, 1997a, Bookstein, 1997b, Bookstein, 1997c, Evans et al., 1991, Cohen et al., 1992, Collins et al., 1992, Cootes and Taylor, 1992, Brechbühler et al., 1992, Hill and Taylor, 1992, Hill et al., 1992, Talbot and Vincent, 1992; Cootes et al., 1993; Gee et al., 1993, Grenander, 1993, Christensen et al., 1994, Christensen et al., 1996, Christensen et al., 1997, Attali and Montanvert, 1994, Brechbühler et al., 1995, Haller et al., 1996, Haller et al., 1997, Drury et al., 1996, Székely et al., 1996, Näf et al., 1996, Näf et al., 1997, Bookstein, 1997a, Bookstein, 1997b, Bookstein, 1997c, Joshi et al., 1997, Morse et al., 1998, Pizer et al., 1998, Angenent et al., 1999, Kelemen et al., 1999). Such descriptions have involved the use of a skeleton or medial axis to extract shape features (e.g. Blum, 1967, Blum, 1973, Bruce and Giblin, 1986, Talbot and Vincent, 1992, Ogniewicz, 1993, Attali and Montanvert, 1994, Kimia et al., 1995, Näf et al., 1996, Näf et al., 1997, August et al., 1999, Golland et al., 1999). Other approaches have included physically based shape representations such as thin-plate-splines and fiducials (e.g. Bookstein, 1989, Bookstein, 1997a, Bookstein, 1997b, Bookstein, 1997c, Pentland and Sclaroff, 1991, DeQuardo et al., 1996), surface or contour based representations (e.g. Kass et al., 1988, Brechbühler et al., 1992, Cohen et al., 1992, Cootes and Taylor, 1992, Cootes et al., 1993a, Cootes et al., 1993b, Hill and Taylor, 1992, Brechbühler et al., 1995, Hill et al., 1992, Hill et al., 1993, Kelemen et al., 1997, Pizer et al., 1998, Angenent et al., 1999), including elastically deformable contour and surface models (e.g. Bajcsy and Kovacic, 1989, Evans et al., 1991, Collins et al., 1992, Gee et al., 1993, Christensen et al., 1994, Christensen et al., 1996, Christensen et al., 1997, Kelemen et al., 1999), and pattern-matching methods derived from the theory of patterns by Grenander (1993) (e.g. Haller et al., 1997, Csernansky et al., 1998). A clear trend in shape analysis is toward the movement from summary measures of whole structures or objects to measures of regional differences in shape, thus incorporating more information about the properties of shape than more simple volumetric measures. Shape descriptions that are represented as high-dimensional features (Haller et al., 1996, Haller et al., 1997, Csernansky et al., 1998, Hogan et al., 2000, Wang et al., 2001) or features derived from a projection onto basis functions (Kelemen et al., 1999) are examples of this trend.
In this study we used an active, flexible deformable shape model to segment automatically the amygdala–hippocampal complex from MR image data. Models were trained from a set of volumes segmented manually by trained experts (derived from our previous study, Shenton et al., 1992). The surfaces of the training objects (amygdala–hippocampal complex) were then converted into parametric surface nets expanded into shape descriptions using spherical harmonic expansion (Brechbühler et al., 1995, Székely et al., 1996). The set of shapes characterized by parameter vectors led to a statistical shape model describing the average object shape and its major modes of variation. This statistical shape model was then used for the segmentation of new datasets. Here, the average shape model was initialized based on a manual selection of three anatomical landmarks (anterior/posterior commissure and a point in the interhemispheric fissure). This shape model was driven by the object boundaries of the new image, although deformation was constrained by the statistics learned from the training sample, which significantly improves the robustness of the method (Kelemen et al., 1999). The resulting objects were represented by a set of parameters, which were then used as input for subsequent classical multivariate analyses to detect group differences in volume and in object surface descriptions (i.e. shape).
Section snippets
The sample
The patient sample consisted of 15 male, chronic schizophrenics who were selected from among patients at the Brockton Veterans Affairs Medical Center. This sample has been reported in previous publications (e.g. Shenton et al., 1992). Briefly, 13 patients were hospitalized, and two were living in foster care homes. Their mean age was 37.6 years (±9.3), mean level of education was 11.7 years, and parental socioeconomic status (PSES) was lower middle class (3.4±0.1, based on Hollingshead, 1965,
Volume analysis
Volumes were normalized by total intracranial volume (ICV) to control for individual head size. An ANOVA showed no differences between groups on total amygdala–hippocampal complex (F=1.74; d.f.=1,56; P=0.19), no differences in left or right amygdala–hippocampal complex (F=0.74, d.f.=1, 56, P=0.39), and no group by side interaction (F=0.001; d.f.=1,56; P=0.072) (see also t-tests in Table 1). [Note: in our earlier study (Shenton et al., 1992), differences in volume were reported between groups
Discussion
We evaluated volume and shape differences in the amygdala–hippocampal complex between patients diagnosed with schizophrenia and normal comparison subjects. We found no differences in overall amygdala–hippocampal volume between groups, but we did report both volume and shape asymmetry differences, which were significantly larger in the patient than in the control group. More specifically, we observed a closer correspondence between the shapes of the left and right amygdala–hippocampal complex in
Acknowledgements
This research was supported in part by funds from the National Institute of Mental Health, including grants NIMH K02 MH-01110 and R01 MH-50747 (Dr Shenton), and NIMH R01-40977 (Dr McCarley); by VA MERIT Awards from the Department of Veterans Affairs (Drs McCarley and Shenton), by the Medical Research Service and Brockton VA Schizophrenia Center of the Department of Veteran Affairs (Dr McCarley); and by P01 CA67165, P01 AG04953, R01 RR11747 and P41 RR13218 (Dr Kikinis). We would also like to
References (108)
- et al.
Mutiresolution elastic matching
Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics and Imaging
(1989) - et al.
Asymmetry of the planum temporale: methodological considerations and clinical associations
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
(1995) Biological shape and visual science
Journal of Theoretical Biology
(1973)- et al.
Reduced temporal limbic structure volumes on magnetic resonance images in first episode schizophrenia
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
(1990) Shape and information in medical images: a decade of the morphometric synthesis
Computer Vision and Image Understanding
(1997)Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: localizing group differences in outline shape
Medical Image Analysis
(1997)- et al.
Parametrization of closed surfaces for 3-D shape description
CVGIP: Image Understanding
(1995) - et al.
Using deformable surfaces to segment 3-D images and infer differential structures
CVGIP: Image Understanding
(1992) - et al.
Asymmetries in the superior temporal lobe in male and female first-episode schizophrenic patients: measures of planum temporale and superior temporal gyrus by MRI
Schizophrenia Research
(1994) - et al.
Brain morphology in first-episode schizophrenic-like psychotic patients: a quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study
Biological Psychiatry
(1991)
Magnetic resonance imaging study of hippocampal volume in chronic, combat related posttraumatic stress disorder
Biological Psychiatry
Model-based image interpretation using genetic algorithms
Image and Vision Computing
Temporal lobe sulco-gyral pattern anomalies in schizophrenia: an in vivo MR three-dimensional surface rendering study
Neuroscience Letters
Medial temporal lobe structures in schizophrenia: relationship of size to duration of illness
Schizophrenia Research
MRI anatomy of schizophrenia
Biological Psychiatry
Zoom-invariant vision of figural shape: effects on cores of image disturbances
Computer Vision and Image Understanding
Cavum septi pellucidi and patients with schizophrenia as detected by magnetic resonance imaging
Biological Psychiatry
Medial and superior temporal gyrus volumes and cerebral asymmetry in schizophrenia versus bipolar disorder
Biological Psychiatry
Zoom-invariant vision of figural shape: the mathematics of cores
Computer Vision and Image Understanding
Planum temporale asymmetry and thought disorder in schizophrenia
Schizophrenia Research
Magnetic resonance imaging findings of amygdala-anterior hippocampus shrinkage in male patients with schizophrenia
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
A review of MRI findings in schizophrenia
Schizophrenia Research
Nuclear magnetic resonance in schizophrenia: a preliminary study
Psychiatry Research
Segmentation of 2-D and 3-D objects from MRI volume data using constrained elastic deformations of flexible Fourier contour and surface models
Medical Image Analysis
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, revised
Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS)
Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS)
Regional brain abnormalities in schizophrenia measured with magnetic resonance imaging
JAMA
On the Laplace–Beltrami operator and brain surface flattening
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
Semicontinuous skeletons of 2D and 3D shapes
On the evolution of the skeleton
Planum temporale asymmetry reversal in schizophrenia: replication and relationship to gray matter abnormalities
American Journal of Psychiatry
Auditory hallucinations and smaller superior temporal gyrus volume in schizophrenia
American Journal of Psychiatry
Genetic variability of human brain size and cortical gyral patterns
Brain
A transformation for extracting new descriptors of shape
Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations
IEEE PAMI
Quadratic variation of deformation
Distribution Free Statistical Tests
Surface parametrization and shape description
Post-mortem evidence of structural changes in schizophrenia: differences in brain weight, temporal horn area and parahippocampal gyrus compared with affective disorders
Archives of General Psychiatry
Growth, motion and one-parameter families of asymmetry sets
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh
Magnetic resonance technology in human brain science: blueprint for a program based upon morphometry
Brain and Development
Gyral development of the brain
Annals of Neurology
Deformable templates using large deformation kinematics
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
Volumetric transformation of brain anatomy
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
Model based segmentation of individual brain structures from MRI data
SPIE Visualization in Biomedical Computing
Active shape models—their training and application
Computer Vision and Image Understanding
Cited by (119)
Differentiating patients with schizophrenia from healthy controls by hippocampal subfields using radiomics
2020, Schizophrenia ResearchCitation Excerpt :This finding improves the understanding of the pathogenetic involvement of distinct hippocampal subfields in the course of schizophrenia without confounding effects of antipsychotic medication. Regional alterations of hippocampal shape have also been identified in schizophrenia, even in the absence of significant volume reductions (Mamah et al., 2016; Narr et al., 2004; Shenton et al., 2002). However, the volumetric or shape information alone seems not to fully capture the neuropathologic process in schizophrenia, which involves neural changes altering tissue characteristics at the microscopic level (i.e., neuronal, glial, immunological, and oxidative aberrations) (Bernstein et al., 2015; Clay et al., 2011; Najjar and Pearlman, 2015; Ross et al., 2006).
Transdiagnostic hippocampal damage patterns in neuroimmunological disorders
2020, NeuroImage: ClinicalCitation Excerpt :For example, morphological changes of the hippocampal surface successfully differentiated patients with MCI and patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) from healthy controls (Gerardin et al., 2009; Li et al., 2007), with superior performance compared to volumetric measures (Gerardin et al., 2009). In schizophrenia, left–right asymmetry of hippocampal shape was observed in patients even in the absence of volume loss (Csernansky et al., 2002; Shenton et al., 2002). In line with this, we show that the combination of shape and volume information yields a better classification performance than any of the measure alone.