Original Paper
Development of a disease specific quality of life (QoL) questionnaire module to supplement the EORTC core cancer QoL questionnaire, the QLQ-C30 in patients with pancreatic cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(99)00047-7Get rights and content

Abstract

There is overwhelming consensus that quality of life assessment is urgently required in pancreatic cancer, yet little research has been conducted. We report on the development of a disease specific questionnaire module to supplement the EORTC core cancer module, the QLQ-C30 in patients with pancreatic cancer, using EORTC quality of life study group guidelines for module development. Relevant QoL issues were generated from literature searches and interviews with health professionals and patients with pancreatic cancer. Issues were constructed into items and provisionally translated. The provisional module was pretested in patients in 8 European centres. The resulting module the QLQ-PAN26 includes 26 items related to disease symptoms, treatment side-effects and emotional issues specific to pancreatic cancer. This should ensure that the module will be sensitive to assess the small but important disease and treatment related QoL changes in pancreatic cancer. The use of the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PAN26 will provide a comprehensive system of QoL assessment in international trials of pancreatic cancer.;

Introduction

The outlook for a patient diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains gloomy in terms of prognosis and survival, with over 90% dying within a year of diagnosis[1]. Treatment options remain limited. Only 20% of patients may be suitable candidates for a ‘curative resection', with only 15–20% of these patients surviving beyond 5 years. The majority of patients receive palliative surgical or medical interventions. The roles of chemotherapy and radiotherapy remain a source of debate within the literature[2]and any benefit in terms of gain in survival time and alleviation of symptoms must be balanced against the costs of treatment toxicity and any deterioration in quality of life (QoL). There is overwhelming consensus that QoL assessment is urgently required in pancreatic cancer3, 4, 5. However, little research has been published and to our knowledge no disease specific questionnaire has been described in the literature.

The EORTC Quality of Life study group have developed a modular approach to the development of QoL questionnaires specifically designed for the clinical trial situation[6]. A 30 item core cancer questionnaire, the QLQ-C30 has been developed. This is intended to be supplemented by additional modules to assess specific disease and treatment related QoL issues, in particular patient subgroups. This approach facilitates generalisability of results across studies and the sensitivity to detect small but clinically meaningful differences in QoL to address specific research questions. To ensure scientific rigour, detailed guidelines for module development have been published[7], and recently updated[8]. We describe the first three phases of the development of a pancreatic cancer specific module to supplement the EORTC QLQ-C30.

Section snippets

Patients and methods

The EORTC guidelines for module development were followed (Fig. 1). Phase 1 was conducted in the U.K. This involved extensive literature searches, using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CANCERLIT and CINAHL databases and qualitative interviews with 29 patients and 6 multi-disciplinary health professionals with experience in pancreatic cancer to generate relevant QoL issues in pancreatic cancer. Purposive sampling allowed a cross section of patients to be identified across the spectrum of disease stage and

Results

The development of the EORTC pancreatic cancer module was undertaken in 2 years (Fig. 1). The initial literature search was largely unproductive and only 26 published papers were identified as relevant[10]. 24 potentially relevant QoL issues were generated, covering symptoms of pancreatic cancer and treatment side effects. No study described QoL from the patients' perspective. No other pancreatic cancer specific questionnaire was identified. The initial grounded theory study of patients and

Discussion

The QLQ-PAN26 is one of a series of disease or treatment specific modules developed by the EORTC QoL study group to supplement the QLQ-C30, using standard guidelines for module development. The use of literature searches, interviews with patients and health professionals and rigorous peer review provides high content validity of the QLQ-PAN26. The study generated specific disease and treatment related symptoms, and issues related to the emotional and social well-being in patients with

Acknowledgements

M. Sprangers, M. Groenvold and J. Blazeby who peer reviewed the development process on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Study Group. D. Fitzsimmons[11]is supported by a South and West Region NHS research and development project grant.

References (12)

  • R. Lionetto et al.

    No standard treatment is available for advanced pancreatic cancer

    Eur J Cancer

    (1995)
  • D. Carter

    Cancer of the Pancreas

    Gut

    (1990)
  • J.H. Alexandre et al.

    Quality of life assessment in pancreatic surgery

    Theoretical Surgery

    (1992)
  • J.D. Ahlgren

    Chemotherapy for pancreatic carcinoma

    Cancer

    (1996)
  • M.L. Rothenberg et al.

    A rationale for expanding endpoints in clinical trials in advanced pancreatic carcinoma

    Cancer

    (1996)
  • N.K. Aaronson et al.

    EORTC Quality of Life Study Group. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (1993)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (217)

  • Phase 1 Dose Escalation Study of SBRT Using 3 Fractions for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

    2023, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
  • GI Symptoms in Pancreatic Cancer

    2023, Clinical Colorectal Cancer
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text