Elsevier

Academic Radiology

Volume 8, Issue 3, March 2001, Pages 211-218
Academic Radiology

Original Investigation
Sources of Absorption and Scattering Contrast for Near-Infrared Optical Mammography

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80529-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives

Near-infrared (NIR) diffuse optical spectroscopy and imaging may enhance existing technologies for breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment. NIR techniques are based on sensitive, quantitative measurements of functional contrast between healthy and diseased tissue. In this study, the authors quantified the origins of this contrast in healthy breasts.

Materials and Methods

A seven-wavelength frequency-domain photon migration probe was used to perform noninvasive NIR measurements in the breasts of 28 healthy women, both pre- and postmenopausal, aged 18–64 years. A diffusive model of light transport quantified oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin, water, and lipid by their absorption signatures. Changes in the measured light-scattering spectra were quantified by means of a “scatter power” parameter.

Results

Substantial quantitative differences were observed in both absorption and scattering spectra of breast as a function of subject age. These physiologic changes were consistent with long-term hormone-dependent transformations that occur in breast. Instrument response was not adversely affected by subject age or menopausal status.

Conclusion

These measurements provide new insight into endogenous optical absorption and scattering contrast mechanisms and have important implications for the development of optical mammography. NIR spectroscopy yields quantitative functional information that cannot be obtained with other noninvasive radiologic techniques.

Section snippets

Patient Selection

All volunteers enrolled in this study competently provided informed consent to participate in one of two trials (nos. 95-563 and 99-2183) under the guidelines of an Institutional Review Board. The 28 women ranged in age from 18 to 64 years. Fifteen of them were premenopausal (average age, 28 years ± 9), and seven were postmenopausal (average age, 56 years ± 2). The remaining six women (average age, 56 years ± 5) were taking some form of hormone replacement therapy (HRT); three of the six

Sensitivity: Pre- versus Postmenopausal Subjects

Both Figure 2, Figure 3 present a typical series of measurements of seven absorption and scattering coefficients, respectively. The points represent an average of several measurements in the center of the left upper outer breast quadrants in two subjects, a 32-year-old premenopausal woman and a 54-year-old postmenopausal woman. Error bars indicate the SDs of repeated measurements. There are vast absorption and scattering differences between pre- and postmenopausal breast tissue. The solid lines

Discussion

Although it is difficult to validate noninvasive in vivo measurements directly, our initial results indicate that the sensitivity of NIR spectroscopy is a reasonable reflection of long-term hormone-controlled breast remodeling. Additional work in the field has demonstrated that short-term menstrual cycle changes are detectible with a similar NIR technique (30). Our results indirectly validate the general accuracy of NIR breast spectroscopy. This quantitative physiologic information is not

References (38)

  • SB Colak et al.

    Clinical optical tomography and NIR spectroscopy for breast cancer detection

    IEEE J Sel Top Quant

    (1999)
  • BJ Tromberg et al.

    Non-invasive in vivo characterization of breast tumors using photon migration spectroscopy

    Neoplasia

    (2000)
  • MJ Holboke et al.

    Three-dimensional diffuse optical mammography with ultrasound localization in a human subject

    J Biomed Opt

    (2000)
  • V Ntziachristos et al.

    Concurrent MRI and diffuse optical tomography of breast after indocyanine green enhancement

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2000)
  • K Suzuki et al.

    Quantitative measurement of optical parameters in normal breasts using time-resolved spectroscopy: in vivo results of 30 Japanese women

    J Biomed Opt

    (1996)
  • V Quaresima et al.

    Identification and quantification of intrinsic optical contrast for near-infrared mammography

    Photochem Photobiol

    (1998)
  • R Cubeddu et al.

    Noninvasive absorption and scattering spectroscopy of bulk diffusive media: an application to the optical characterization of human breast

    Appl Phys Lett

    (1999)
  • S Thomsen et al.

    Physiological and pathological factors of human breast disease that can influence optical diagnosis

    Ann N Y Acad Sci

    (1998)
  • Cited by (284)

    • A review of optical breast imaging: Multi-modality systems for breast cancer diagnosis

      2020, European Journal of Radiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Optical breast imaging evolved with further improvements in spectral narrowing by utilizing specified wavelengths of light that are selectively absorbed by different tissue components, and through light propagation modelling, i.e. improving the accuracy of mapping tissue components within the path of transmitted light by computer modeling and reconstruction of the absorption and scattering properties of the intervening tissue. In this way, four major tissue components can be quantified, including: water, fat, and oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin [23,24]. In the case of Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy (DOS) and Diffuse Optical Tomography (DOT), NIR light at specified wavelengths is transmitted into the breast through optical ‘transmit’ fibers and the emitted light (both transmitted and scattered) is detected by a series of optical ‘receive’ fibers [25,26].

    • Imaging Biomarkers for Precision Medicine in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

      2018, Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences
    • MATHEMATICAL AND NUMERICAL CHALLENGES IN DIFFUSE OPTICAL TOMOGRAPHY INVERSE PROBLEMS

      2024, Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - Series S
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported by grants and gifts from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Laser Microbeam and Medical Program (RR-01192), the NIH (R29-GM50958), the Department of Energy (DOE DE-FG03-91ER61227), the Office of Naval Research (ONR N00014-91-C-0134), the California Breast Cancer Research Program, Avon, the U.S. Army Medical Research and Material Command (DAMD17-98-1-8186) (A.E.C.), the George E. Hewitt Foundation (A.J.B), and the Swiss National Science Foundation (F.B.).

    1

    Current address: Institute of Optics, University of Rochester, NY.

    View full text