Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Captive roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) select for low amounts of tannic acid but not quebracho: fluctuation of preferences and potential benefits
Introduction
Ecological (Cooper and Owen-Smith, 1985, Cooper et al., 1988) and experimental work on tannins (Distel and Provenza, 1991, McArthur et al., 1993) showed that ruminants generally seem to select against tannins in their natural forages. However, Cooper and Owen-Smith (1985) found a ‘threshold’ of 5% condensed tannin content below which they could not detect any influence of tannin concentration on feeding preference. For duiker (Cephalophus) species, an avoidance of tannins could not be demonstrated in trials with natural feedstuffs (Faurie and Perrin, 1993, Müller et al., 1998). Additionally, Tixier et al. (1997) found that free-ranging roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) selected a diet of higher tannin content than the average tannin content of all available forage in the habitat. After a detailed analysis they concluded that this could not simply be a side effect of a selection for plants with high soluble carbohydrate contents, which also had high tannin levels. Experimental work by McArthur et al. (1993) supported the idea that browsing ruminants (adapted to dietary tannins) will tolerate a certain tannin load if that is the cost of ingesting otherwise higher quality forage. Finally, Verheyden-Tixier et al., 1999, Verheyden-Tixier and Duncan, 2000 performed preference trials with captive roe deer groups with identical pelleted diets that differed only in their tannin content, which indicated that the animals actively included a certain amount of tannins in their daily ration.
Historically, the negative effects of tannins on ruminants have been emphasized (Kumar and Singh, 1984). However, positive effects of tannins have been investigated more recently and have been reviewed for wild animals (Clauss, 2003) and comprise anthelmintic, antibacterial and antioxidative effects as well as a protection of valuable nutrients from forestomach fermentation; these postive effects could account for a potential selection for low doses of tannins. So far, potentially positive effects have not been demonstrated in wild ruminant species.
We adopted the trial design of Verheyden-Tixier et al. (1999), using two different tannin sources and increasing the time period of the individual preference trials (which had, in their study, lasted for 5–8 days with one exception of 15 days), as we wanted to test whether preference or avoidance patterns varied with time. Additionally, we wanted to compare the effect of mid-term tannin feeding on measurable physiological parameters of roe deer fawns by feeding them either a control or tannin—containing pelleted diet for 7.5 months.
Section snippets
Basal and experimental diets
A basic pelleted diet was formulated that met the nutritional requirements of captive roe deer and could be used as a sole feed. This diet consisted of lucerne meal (39.8% of original ingredient mass), crushed oats (39.1%), crushed wheat (7.6%), bran (9.9%), soy oil (0.6%), linseed oil (0.6%), a calcium-phosphorus-premix (1.2%) and a vitamin/mineral-premix (1.2%). Prior to the feeding experiments, this diet was fed for several weeks to the experimental animals. The tannin-containing diets were
Preference trials
The time period for which a preference trial was conducted had distinctive effects on the outcome of the trial. For example, regarding the choices of ‘Adult2’ with respect to tannic acid (Fig. 1), after five days this group ingested a pelleted diet with approximately 3.5% tannic acid. During the next six days, they chose higher tannin concentrations of 4–4.5%. In the following 10 days, however, there was a decrease in tannic acid preference and a stable choice pattern at a level of 3.0% tannic
Discussion
According to Hagerman et al. (1992), results derived from experimental feeding of tannic acid or quebracho are not necessarily the same as those that would be achieved, if natural tannin sources were used (which are, however, generally not available). Even if these two commercially available tannin sources are included in feeds in identical amounts, as in our trial, differences in the amount of biochemically active tannin substances will occur between the two preparations: whereas the tannic
Acknowledgements
We thank P. Baumann for his support in captive roe deer husbandry and management, K. Männer for his support in producing the pelleted roe deer diet, and the Zoological Garden of Rostock for the support of this study.
References (56)
- et al.
The effect of food quality and relative abundance on food choice in fallow deer
Anim. Behav.
(2002) - et al.
Direct anthelmintic effects of condensed tannins towards different gastrointestinal nematodes of sheep: in vitro and in vivo studies
Vet. Parasitol.
(2001) - et al.
Dual-isotope method for determination of human zinc absorption: the use of a test meal of turkey meat
J. Nutr.
(1985) - et al.
Flavonoids and tannins: plant-based antioxidants with vitamin character
Med. Hypoth.
(1999) Consumption and digestibility of Lespedeza sericea hay and alfalfa hay plus gallotannin
J. Dairy. Sci.
(1955)- et al.
Potential health impacts of excessive flavonoid intake
Free Radical Biol. Med.
(2000) - et al.
Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid
Analyt. Biochem.
(1985) - et al.
Evaluation of bengal gram (Cicer arietinum) husk as a source of tannin and its interference in rumen and post-rumen nutrient digestion in sheep
Anim. Feed Sci. Technol.
(2000) - et al.
Antioxidant effects of dietary polymeric grape seed tannins in tissues of rats fed a high cholesterol-vitamin E-deficient diet
Food Chem.
(1997) - et al.
Development of feeding selectivity in roe deer
Behav. Proc.
(1998)
Tannin binding proteins in the saliva of deer and their absence in the saliva of sheep and cattle
J. Chem. Ecol.
The role of condensed tannins in the nutritional value of Lotus pedunculatus for sheep. 2. Quantitative digestion of carbohydrates and proteins
Br. J. Nutr.
Effects of foraging experience on food selectivity of tame mule deer
J. Wildl. Manage.
Improved method for the determination of blood glutathione
J. Lab. Clin. Med.
Polyphenolics: chemistry, dietary sources, metabolism and nutritional significance
Nutr. Rev.
Effect of dietary tannin and protein concentration on nematode infection in lambs
J. Agric. Sci.
Food intake, preference patterns and digestion coefficients in captive giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis) offered a tannin-containing pelleted diet
Verh. Ber. Erkr. Zootiere
Condensed tannins deter feeding by browsing ruminants in a South African savanna
Oecologia
Foliage acceptability to browsing ruminants in relation to seasonal changes in the leaf chemistry of woody plants in a South African savanna
Oecologia
Influence of flavor on goat feeding preferences
J. Chem. Ecol.
Experience early in life affects voluntary intake of blackbrush by goats
J. Chem. Ecol.
Influence of tannins on the nutritive value of soybean meal for ruminants
J. Anim. Sci.
The effect of monoterpene concentrations in Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) on the browsing behaviour of red deer (Cervus elaphus)
Can. J. Zool.
Diet selection and utilization in blue duikers and red duikers
Afr. J. Zool.
Analysis of parotid and mixed saliva in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus)
J. Comp. Physiol. B
Digestive utilization of quebracho-treated soya bean meals in sheep
J. Agric. Sci.
Effects of learning on food selection and searching behaviour of deer
Can. J. Zool.
Cited by (58)
Beyond sweetness: The high-intensity sweeteners and farm animals
2020, Animal Feed Science and TechnologyDigesta passage in nondomestic ruminants: Separation mechanisms in ‘moose-type’ and ‘cattle-type’ species, and seemingly atypical browsers
2019, Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology -Part A : Molecular and Integrative PhysiologyCitation Excerpt :Salivary defences against tannins are clearly not an obligatory feature of the digestive strategy of ruminants (Hanovice-Ziony et al., 2010; Salem et al., 2013). Although tannins have negative effects on measures of digestibility (Robbins et al., 1987a; Robbins et al., 1987b), positive effects in ruminants at low dosages have been reported, and linked to the protection of dietary proteins against microbial degradation in the rumen due to a (reversible) binding with tannins (Clauss et al., 2003a; Makkar, 2003). Alternative strategies to the primary defence against tannins by a high-viscosity, proteinaceous saliva have been reviewed repeatedly (Makkar, 2003; Mlambo et al., 2015) and comprise behavioural diet selection strategies, most importantly adaptations of the rumen microbiome, and detoxification in the liver.
Seasonal changes in the concentrations of plant secondary metabolites and their effects on food selection by Microtus oeconomus
2014, Mammalian BiologyCitation Excerpt :This result indicates that condensed tannins are not a primary deterrent of plant intake by root voles. Similarly, Verheyden-Tixier and Duncan (2000) and Clauss et al. (2003) found that roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) actively select for tannins in a certain range of tannins concentration. Moose (Alces alces) frequently use Pinus contorta as food, which has high condensed tannin content (Niemelä and Danell, 1988; Ball and Dahlgren, 2002); hence, tannins do not appear to have any significant effect on plant selection by moose (Stolter et al., 2005).
Design and methodology of choice feeding experiments with ruminant livestock
2012, Applied Animal Behaviour ScienceCitation Excerpt :In ‘choice experiments’ or ‘choice feeding experiments’ with ruminant livestock two or more feeds are offered separately at the same time, and the proportions consumed and preferences for the feeds on offer are measured. As preference and palatability are usually the target variables, this type of experiment is named either ‘preference test’ (Aderibigbe et al., 1982; Alonso-Díaz et al., 2009; Dumont and Petit, 1995; Duncan and Young, 2002; Ginane et al., 2005; Kyriazakis et al., 1998; Parsons et al., 1994; Simitzis et al., 2008b; Villalba and Provenza, 1999), or ‘preference study’ (Rogosic et al., 2006), ‘preference trial’ (Catanese et al., 2010; Clauss et al., 2003; Fisher et al., 1999), ‘palatability experiment’ (Scharenberg et al., 2007), ‘cafeteria experiment’ (Alonso-Díaz et al., 2008), ‘cafeteria trial’ (De Rosa et al., 2002; Degen et al., 2010), ‘cafeteria method’ (Kalio et al., 2006), ‘cafeteria technique’ (Larbi et al., 1993), ‘cafeteria feeding’ (Dikmen et al., 2009; Keskin et al., 2004) and ‘cafeteria study’ (Sandoval-Castro et al., 2005). Several studies cited in the present review do not use one of these terms for their choice feeding experiments.
Phenology of foliar and volatile terpenoid production for Thuja plicata families under differential nutrient availability
2012, Environmental and Experimental Botany