Trends in Cognitive Sciences
ReviewClassical conditioning, awareness, and brain systems
Section snippets
Brain substrates for delay and trace eyeblink conditioning
Work with rabbits first demonstrated a clear distinction between delay and trace eyeblink conditioning. The acquisition and retention of delay eyeblink conditioning require the cerebellum and associated brainstem structures [12]; no forebrain structures (including the hippocampus) are required. Thus, decerebrate rabbits with no remaining forebrain tissue (i.e. after removal of cerebral cortex, basal ganglia, limbic system, thalamus, and hypothalamus) exhibited normal retention of delay eyeblink
Awareness and differential eyeblink conditioning
In delay and trace differential conditioning, the CS+ (e.g. a tone) is followed by the US whereas the CS− (e.g. a static noise) is presented alone. Successful differential conditioning occurs when more CRs are elicited by the CS+ than by the CS−. In differential conditioning, the participant can in principle learn several different facts about the stimulus contingencies (for example, the CS+ predicts the US, the CS− does not predict the US, and the CS+ and CS− are unrelated), and knowledge
Remaining issues concerning differential eyeblink conditioning
These studies suggest that awareness of the stimulus contingencies is important for successful differential trace conditioning but is unnecessary for differential delay conditioning. Nevertheless, it is possible to construct differential delay conditioning protocols where awareness is related to successful conditioning. Particularly interesting are two studies where tones (800 Hz and 2100 Hz), rather than a tone and static noise, served as the CS+ and CS−. Individuals who were identified as
Awareness and single-cue eyeblink conditioning
In single-cue conditioning, only one CS is presented, and the level of conditioning is determined by the number of trials in which a CR occurs. The relationship of awareness to single-cue conditioning was not evaluated systematically in earlier studies of eyeblink conditioning because most participants (especially the young adults typically studied) became aware of the simple contingency (the CS predicts the US). Nevertheless, early investigators viewed single-cue delay conditioning as simple
Expectancy of the US and delay and trace conditioning
The findings reviewed here suggest that delay and trace eyeblink conditioning are fundamentally different kinds of learning. Successful trace conditioning is related to the development of awareness (declarative knowledge) about the stimulus contingencies. By contrast, successful delay conditioning is unrelated to the development of awareness, at least in standard delay (or differential) paradigms where the CS (or the CS+ and CS−) can be processed easily. Individuals who develop awareness of the
Conclusion
The studies outlined above can be understood in terms of the declarative and nondeclarative memory systems that support eyeblink classical conditioning. In both delay and trace conditioning paradigms, individuals sometimes develop declarative (conscious) knowledge about the stimulus contingencies, and sometimes do not. For the most commonly studied forms of delay conditioning, declarative knowledge is superfluous to the acquisition of the CR and conditioned performance can be supported by
Acknowledgements
The authors’ work reviewed herein was supported by the Medical Research Service of the Department of Veterans Affairs, NIMH grant 24650, and the Metropolitan Life Foundation. Joseph Manns is now at the Dept of Psychology, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
References (56)
- et al.
Cerebellar circuits and synaptic mechanisms involved in classical eyeblink conditioning
Trends Neurosci.
(1997) Further evidence for unconscious learning: preliminary support for the conditioning of facial EMG to subliminal stimuli
J. Psychiatr. Res.
(1999)- et al.
Retention of classically conditioned eyelid responses following acute decerebration
Brain Res.
(1987) Trace conditioning: abolished by cerebellar nuclear lesions but not lateral cerebellar cortex aspirations
Brain Res.
(1985)Hippocampal lesions prevent trace eyeblink conditioning in the freely moving rat
Behav. Brain Res.
(1999)- et al.
Lesions of the caudal area of the rabbit medial prefrontal cortex impair trace eyeblink conditioning
Neurobiol. Learn. Mem.
(1998) Classical eyeblink conditioning in the bilaterally hemispherectomized cat
Exp. Neurol.
(1974)- et al.
Hippocampectomy selectively disrupts discrimination reversal conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response
Behav. Brain Res.
(1983) - et al.
Conditioning in amnesic patients
Neuropsychologia
(1979) Memory and the hippocampus: a synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans
Psychol. Rev.
(1992)
From Conditioning to Conscious Recollection: Memory Systems of the Brain
Invertebrate learning and memory: from behavior to molecules
Annu. Rev. Neurosci.
A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement
Memory: From Mind to Molecules
Nictitating membrane: classical conditioning and extinction in the albino rabbit
Science
Can classical conditioning occur without contingency learning? A review and evaluation of the evidence
Psychophysiology
Information processing and human autonomic classical conditioning
Adv. Psychophysiol.
Organization of memory traces in the mammalian brain
Annu. Rev. Neurosci.
Classical conditioning after cerebellar lesions in humans
Behav. Neurosci.
Effects of a unilateral cerebellar lesion on the acquisition of eye-blink conditioning in man
J. Physiol.
Deficit in classical conditioning in patients with cerebellar degeneration
Brain
Disrupted eyelid conditioning in a patient with damage to cerebellar afferents
Behav. Neurosci.
Classical conditioning in patients with severe memory problems
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry
Intact delay-eyeblink classical conditioning in amnesia
Behav. Neurosci.
Hippocampectomy impairs the memory of recently, but not remotely, acquired trace eyeblink conditioned responses
Behav. Neurosci.
Hippocampus and trace conditioning of the rabbit's classically conditioned nictitating membrane response
Behav. Neurosci.
Hippocampectomy disrupts trace eye-blink conditioning in rabbits
Behav. Neurosci.
Cited by (182)
Next frontiers in consciousness research
2023, NeuronNeural indices of multimodal sensory and autonomic hyperexcitability in fibromyalgia
2023, Neurobiology of PainA cognitive account of trace conditioning in insects
2023, Current Opinion in Insect ScienceUnraveling Molecular and System Processes for Fear Memory
2022, Neuroscience