Elsevier

The Lancet Oncology

Volume 13, Issue 1, January 2012, Pages e23-e31
The Lancet Oncology

Review
EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer: preclinical data and clinical implications

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70129-2Get rights and content

Summary

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death. The identification of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) somatic mutations defined a new, molecularly classified subgroup of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Classic EGFR activating mutations, such as inframe deletions in exon 19 or the Leu858Arg (L858R) point mutation in exon 21 are associated with sensitivity to first generation quinazoline reversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations, which are typically located after the C-helix of the tyrosine kinase domain of EGFR, may account for up to 4% of all EGFR mutations. Preclinical models have shown that the most prevalent EGFR exon 20 insertion mutated proteins are resistant to clinically achievable doses of reversible (gefitinib, erlotinib) and irreversible (neratinib, afatinib, PF00299804) EGFR TKIs. Growing clinical experience with patients whose tumours harbour EGFR exon 20 insertions corresponds with the preclinical data; very few patients have had responses to EGFR TKIs. Despite the prevalence and biological importance of EGFR exon 20 insertions, few reports have summarised all preclinical and clinical data on these mutations. Here, we review the literature and provide an update with an emphasis on the structural, molecular, and clinical implications of EGFR exon 20 insertions.

Introduction

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, with more than 1·6 million cases diagnosed and 1·3 million deaths per year.1 Therefore, even small subgroups of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) contribute to significant morbidity and mortality.

In 2004, the identification of somatic mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) provided a glimpse into a clinically relevant oncogene and a new molecularly classified subgroup of NSCLC.2, 3, 4 Among the multitude of mutations found in the EGFR gene (figure 1), the most common cluster in two regions and are often termed classic activating mutations. These include inframe deletions around the LeuArgGluAla motif (residues 746–750) of exon 19 (roughly 45–50% of all EGFR mutations), and the Leu858Arg (L858R) point mutation in exon 21 (about 40–45% of EGFR mutations).5, 6, 7 Classic EGFR mutations are more common in tumours in women, Asians, never smokers, and those with adenocarcinoma histology.5, 7, 8 About 15% of all NSCLCs in western Europeans, 30% in East Asians, and 50% in never smokers are EGFR mutation-positive.5, 7, 8 Most patients with exon 19 deletions or Leu858Arg EGFR activating mutations have substantial clinical and radiographic responses to monotherapy with the reversible anilinoquinazoline, ATP-mimetic EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) gefitinib and erlotinib.9 Response rates (RRs) exceed 70%, with median progression-free survival (PFS) of longer than 9 months and overall survival (OS) that reaches 24 months.9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 At least three randomised phase 3 trials have shown a better RR and PFS with gefitinib or erlotinib compared with chemotherapy in patients with classic EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.18, 19, 20, 21 Additional EGFR mutations (figure 1) have been associated with some sensitivity to gefitinib and erlotinib, although their ability to predict a radiographic and clinical response to gefitinib or erlotinib is less striking than that of classic EGFR mutations.22 These include point mutations in position Gly719 of exon 18 (Gly719Ala, Cys, or Ser), which account for about 3% of EGFR mutations, and a recurrent Leu861Gln mutation in exon 21 that represents about 2% of EGFR mutations.23, 24 The frequency of classic EGFR mutations in patients with different ethnic backgrounds has not been completely established; however, EGFR genotyping of large prospective cohorts of western Europeans with NSCLC shows a higher frequency of exon 19 deletions than Leu858Arg mutations,11 compared with similar cohorts or clinical trials of east Asian populations where exon 19 deletions are only slightly more prevalent than Leu858Arg mutations.18

Some EGFR mutations are not often associated with radiographic responses and clinical benefit with reversible EGFR TKIs. This is the case for most exon 20 EGFR insertions reported so far.25, 26, 27 Exon 20 insertion mutations might account for up to 4% of all EGFR mutations,22, 24, 28 and therefore as many as 10 000 new yearly cases of NSCLC worldwide.1 The latter estimate is based on data from global trends in incidence of cancer and does not address geographic and ethnic variations related to NSCLCs with EGFR mutations.

Section snippets

Structure of EGFR and implications for exon 20 insertions

EGFR is part of the ErbB family of cell surface receptor tyrosine kinases, which control signal transduction pathways that regulate proliferation and apoptosis.29 These transmembrane receptors subsist as monomers on the cell surface and homodimerise or heterodimerise in response to ligands, such as EGF, epiregulin, and transforming growth factor alpha.24, 30 EGFR, like most tyrosine kinases, has an on–off equilibrium that dictates its ability to transition into inactive and active states.31, 32

Frequency of EGFR exon 20 insertions

Almost all exon 20 insertion mutations described up to now occur in 14 aminoacids of the N-lobe of EGFR, encompassing residues Glu762 to Cys775 (figure 2, table 1). The true frequency of exon 20 insertions within the larger EGFR mutated NSCLC pool is unknown, with reports describing from 1 to 10% contribution to the total number of EGFR mutations identified.22, 24, 25, 44 However, 4% seems to be most widely reported in compiled cohorts of published EGFR mutations.23, 24 A review of the Wellcome

Preclinical studies of EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations

By contrast with other EGFR activating mutations, no patient-derived cell line with an exon 20 insertion has been reported. Cell lines harbouring EGFR mutations, such as Leu858Arg (NCI-H3255, HCC4011), delGlu746_Ala750 (HCC827, PC9), and Leu858Arg-Thr790Met (NCI-H1975), have been invaluable for understanding the predictive role of EGFR TKIs and the biology of classic and resistant EGFR mutations.39, 55 There are also no genetically engineered mouse models (GEMM) for exon 20 insertions, although

Clinical studies with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations

Gefitinib and erlotinib are widely used EGFR TKIs in NSCLC, and many retrospective and prospective reports have genotyped EGFR and correlated the pattern of radiographic and clinical responses seen with subtypes of EGFR mutations. Anecdotal reports, dating back to 2005, indicated that NSCLCs with EGFR exon 20 insertions were not as responsive to gefitinib or erlotinib as tumours with EGFR Gly719X, Leu858Arg, Leu861Gln, and exon 19 deletions.26 These initial observations agreed with preclinical

Implications for drug development and patient care

Classic EGFR mutations, such as Leu858Arg and exon 19 deletions, have become the most robust predictive marker for clinical benefit with EGFR TKIs, in patients with NSCLC.20, 74 However, not all EGFR mutations have the same effect. For the most commonly reported EGFR exon 20 insertions, there is growing preclinical and clinical evidence that these mutation types are unique and do not enhance the sensitivity of the EGFR kinase domain, or of tumours harbouring these mutated oncogenes, to EGFR

Search strategy and selection criteria

Data for this Review were identified by searches of Medline, PubMed, and references from relevant articles using the search terms “EGFR”, “exon 20”, and “insertions”. Abstracts and reports from meetings were included only when they related directly to previously published work or important unpublished data. Only articles published in English up to April 7, 2011, were included.

References (76)

  • H Ji et al.

    The impact of human EGFR kinase domain mutations on lung tumorigenesis and in vivo sensitivity to EGFR-targeted therapies

    Cancer Cell

    (2006)
  • A Jemal et al.

    Global cancer statistics

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (2011)
  • TJ Lynch et al.

    Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib

    N Engl J Med

    (2004)
  • JG Paez et al.

    EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy

    Science

    (2004)
  • W Pao et al.

    EGF receptor gene mutations are common in lung cancers from “never smokers” and are associated with sensitivity of tumors to gefitinib and erlotinib

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2004)
  • H Shigematsu et al.

    Clinical and biological features associated with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in lung cancers

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (2005)
  • M Tokumo et al.

    The relationship between epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and clinicopathologic features in non-small cell lung cancers

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2005)
  • LV Sequist et al.

    Molecular predictors of response to epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists in non-small-cell lung cancer

    J Clin Oncol

    (2007)
  • GJ Riely et al.

    Update on epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in non-small cell lung cancer

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2006)
  • LV Sequist et al.

    First-line gefitinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring somatic EGFR mutations

    J Clin Oncol

    (2008)
  • R Rosell et al.

    Screening for epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2009)
  • A Inoue et al.

    Prospective phase II study of gefitinib for chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations

    J Clin Oncol

    (2006)
  • H Asahina et al.

    A phase II trial of gefitinib as first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations

    Br J Cancer

    (2006)
  • A Sutani et al.

    Gefitinib for non-small-cell lung cancer patients with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations screened by peptide nucleic acid-locked nucleic acid PCR clamp

    Br J Cancer

    (2006)
  • K Tamura et al.

    Multicentre prospective phase II trial of gefitinib for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations: results of the West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group trial (WJTOG0403)

    Br J Cancer

    (2008)
  • M Maemondo et al.

    Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR

    N Engl J Med

    (2010)
  • TS Mok et al.

    Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma

    N Engl J Med

    (2009)
  • C Zhou et al.

    Efficacy results from the randomized phase III OPTIMAL (CTONG 0802) study comparing first-line erlotinib versus carboplatin (CBDCA) plus gemcitabine (GEM), in Chinese advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (PTS) with EGFR activating mutations

    Ann Oncol

    (2010)
  • W Pao et al.

    Rational, biologically based treatment of EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer

    Nat Rev Cancer

    (2010)
  • T Mitsudomi et al.

    Epidermal growth factor receptor in relation to tumor development: EGFR gene and cancer

    FEBS J

    (2010)
  • T Mitsudomi et al.

    Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene and related genes as determinants of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors sensitivity in lung cancer

    Cancer Sci

    (2007)
  • JY Wu et al.

    Lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 mutations is associated with poor gefitinib treatment response

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2008)
  • H Greulich et al.

    Oncogenic transformation by inhibitor-sensitive and -resistant EGFR mutants

    PLoS Med

    (2005)
  • Y Yuza et al.

    Allele-dependent variation in the relative cellular potency of distinct EGFR inhibitors

    Cancer Biol Ther

    (2007)
  • LV Sequist et al.

    Response to treatment and survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing somatic EGFR mutation testing

    Oncologist

    (2007)
  • SV Sharma et al.

    Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer

    Nat Rev Cancer

    (2007)
  • RS Herbst et al.

    Lung cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2008)
  • A Kumar et al.

    Structure and clinical relevance of the epidermal growth factor receptor in human cancer

    J Clin Oncol

    (2008)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text