Methodologic Ramifications of Paying Attention to Sex and Gender Differences in Clinical Research
References (13)
- et al.
The Delphi list: A criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus
J Clin Epidemiol
(1998) - et al.
Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists
Control Clin Trials
(1995) CONSORT: An evolving tool to help improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials
JAMA
(1998)- et al.
Clinical epidemiological quality in molecular genetic research: The need for methodological standards
JAMA
(1999) Sex and gender: The challenges for epidemiologists
Int J Health Serv
(2003)- et al.
Association between genetic polymorphisms of the beta2-adrenoceptor and response to albuterol in children with and without a history of wheezing
J Clin Invest
(1997)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (14)
Sex-based differences in adults with community-acquired bacterial meningitis: a prospective cohort study
2017, Clinical Microbiology and InfectionCitation Excerpt :Several aspects should be considered when interpreting the results of our study. First, it has several strengths, namely its prospective design and large sample, which allowed us to find significant differences while avoiding some of the methodological issues that often arise in sex and gender studies [44]. Both sexes were included prospectively in similar numbers, which are representative of the general population, and we present sex-disaggregated data and sex-based analyses of relevant characteristics.
Gender-based analysis is essential to improving women's health and health care
2014, Women's Health IssuesGender perspectives in European research
2008, Pharmacological ResearchSex differences in thromboprophylaxis of the critically ill: a secondary analysis of a randomized trial
2023, Canadian Journal of AnesthesiaDetermining if sex bias exists in human surgical clinical research
2016, JAMA Surgery
Copyright © 2007 Published by Elsevier USA