Elsevier

Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews

Volume 62, Issue 11, 30 August 2010, Pages 1052-1063
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews

Imaging and drug delivery using theranostic nanoparticles

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2010.08.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Nanoparticle technologies are significantly impacting the development of both therapeutic and diagnostic agents. At the intersection between treatment and diagnosis, interest has grown in combining both paradigms into clinically effective formulations. This concept, recently coined as theranostics, is highly relevant to agents that target molecular biomarkers of disease and is expected to contribute to personalized medicine. Here we review state-of-the-art nanoparticles from a therapeutic and a diagnostic perspective and discuss challenges in bringing these fields together. Major classes of nanoparticles include, drug conjugates and complexes, dendrimers, vesicles, micelles, core–shell particles, microbubbles, and carbon nanotubes. Most of these formulations have been described as carriers of either drugs or contrast agents. To observe these formulations and their interactions with disease, a variety of contrast agents have been used, including optically active small molecules, metals and metal oxides, ultrasonic contrast agents, and radionuclides. The opportunity to rapidly assess and adjust treatment to the needs of the individual offers potential advantages that will spur the development of theranostic agents.

Introduction

Medical nanotechnology has been developing for decades, and innovative applications are coming to fruition [1]. Nanoparticle formulations, such as DoxilTM and AbraxaneTM, have demonstrated clinical relevance by increasing drug efficacy and decreasing toxicity, and numerous targeted formulations are under clinical evaluation [2], [3]. Some promising applications use nanometer-scale particles for simultaneous drug delivery and molecular imaging. There are unique opportunities to use multifunctional formulations for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. This review focuses on the inherent feasibility and practicality of this concept.

Currently, the term ‘theranostics’ encompasses two distinct definitions. We focus on theranostics as defined by the combination of therapeutic and diagnostic agents on a single platform. Specifically, we explore the development of theranostic nanoparticles (TNPs) that may simultaneously monitor and treat disease. A slightly broader definition has also been proposed, whereby theranostics is defined by use of an appropriate diagnostic methodology to personalize a separate therapeutic intervention [4]. Due to the widespread use of diagnostic tools in clinical decision-making, we have focused on the narrower definition. TNPs offer opportunities to combine passive and active targeting, environmentally-responsive drug release, molecular imaging, and other therapeutic functions into a single platform.

The engineering of multifunctional TNPs will not be straightforward; furthermore, instructive lessons can be gleaned from nearly a half-century of research on nanoparticulate drug carriers. Potential obstacles to successful TNPs include the discovery and targeting of new biomarkers, the innate toxicity of the nanoparticle components, formulation stability, production costs, and control of intellectual property [5], [6]. As these new formulations arise, so do large knowledge gaps regarding the safety of nanoparticulates [7]. In addition, optimal therapeutics and diagnostics are two very different entities. Diagnostic (or contrast) agents serve to enhance visibility of specific tissues by increasing the signal to noise ratio relative to surrounding tissues and are generally optimized to provide a quick, high-fidelity snapshot of the living system. Depending upon the wash-in/wash-out kinetics and clearance times of the agent, either a low or high molecular weight (fast or slow clearing) contrast agent can be used [8]. Therapeutic nanoparticle formulations that have been used clinically are commonly long-circulating. This potential discrepancy between fast and slow clearance rates must be reconciled to develop clinically useful TNPs.

The development of effective TNPs will require some give and take between imaging sensitivity, accuracy of targeting, and controlled drug release. Via a host of materials, many pathways are being explored to reach these goals. Currently, the modalities available for imaging of TNPs include optical imaging, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), nuclear imaging, computed tomography (CT), and ultrasound (US) [9]. Each imaging modality and TNP has relative advantages and disadvantages, which will be discussed.

Section snippets

Imaging modality

Molecular imaging allows the characterization of biological processes at the cellular and subcellular levels in intact organisms. By exploiting specific molecular probes or contrast agents, this powerful technique can detect and characterize early stage disease and provide a rapid method for evaluating treatment. Currently used molecular imaging modalities include MRI, CT, US, optical imaging (bioluminescence and fluorescence), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron

Nanoparticles

By definition, TNPs are multifunctional due to the co-incorporation of both therapeutic and imaging agents. In addition, TNPs may have mechanisms for targeted accumulation, drug activation, or enhancement of contrast. An ideal TNP may have molecular targeting that can be imaged during its circulation in the body. Upon reaching its destination, it may have targeting moieties that associate with cell-surface receptors, internalize into the cytosol, target to the intracellular target if necessary,

Discussion

Most of the contrast agents currently in use consist of low molecular weight compounds that are non-specific, thus making the quantification of diseases at the early stages difficult. The development of nanoparticulate-based contrast agents offers a platform for engineering specificity and sensitivity required for in vivo molecular imaging, some examples of these are depicted in Fig. 3. Furthermore, they offer a large surface area, improved circulation time and stability, control over toxicity

Conclusion

The traditional concept of separating diagnosis and treatment may be in flux. Nanotechnology is blurring the lines between the two entities. Due to the potential advantages that TNPs offer — non-invasive quantification and individualized pharmacotherapy — they represent an exciting opportunity to better manage patients and disease. It is plausible that in the coming years, TNPs will emerge and enter clinical trials. Nanoparticles that can simultaneously detect, image, and treat disease may one

Acknowledgements

This work was aided by the University of Southern California, School of Pharmacy to SMJ, ASM and JAM, by grant IRG-58-007-48 from the American Cancer Society to JAM, and by the Malaysian Public Services Department to SMJ.

References (165)

  • Z.R. Lu

    Molecular imaging of HPMA copolymers: visualizing drug delivery in cell, mouse and man

    Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.

    (2010)
  • T. Lammers et al.

    Simultaneous delivery of doxorubicin and gemcitabine to tumors in vivo using prototypic polymeric drug carriers

    Biomaterials

    (2009)
  • M.P. Borgman et al.

    Tumor-targeted HPMA copolymer-(RGDfK)-(CHX-A″-DTPA) conjugates show increased kidney accumulation

    J. Control. Release

    (2008)
  • T.P. Thomas et al.

    Dendrimer-based tumor cell targeting of fibroblast growth factor-1

    Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.

    (2010)
  • S.D. Konda et al.

    Specific targeting of folate-dendrimer MRI contrast agents to the high affinity folate receptor expressed in ovarian tumor xenografts

    Magn. Reson. Mater. Phys., Biol. Med.

    (2001)
  • D.H. Levine et al.

    Polymersomes: a new multi-functional tool for cancer diagnosis and therapy

    Methods

    (2008)
  • A. Dicko et al.

    Biophysical characterization of a liposomal formulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2010)
  • P. Tardi et al.

    In vivo maintenance of synergistic cytarabine:Daunorubicin ratios greatly enhances therapeutic efficacy

    Leuk. Res.

    (2009)
  • W.S. Lim et al.

    Leukemia-selective uptake and cytotoxicity of cpx-351, a synergistic fixed-ratio cytarabine: Daunorubicin formulation, in bone marrow xenografts

    Leuk. Res.

    (2010)
  • W.F. Bayne et al.

    Pharmacokinetics of CPX-351 (cytarabine/daunorubicin HCl) liposome injection in the mouse

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (2009)
  • V.S. Trubetskoy et al.

    Controlled delivery of Gd-containing liposomes to lymph nodes: surface modification may enhance MRI contrast properties

    Magn. Reson. Imaging

    (1995)
  • H. Alkan-Onyuksel et al.

    Development of inherently echogenic liposomes as an ultrasonic contrast agent

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1996)
  • S.M. Demos et al.

    In vitro targeting of antibody-conjugated echogenic liposomes for site-specific ultrasonic image enhancement

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1997)
  • F. Meng et al.

    Biodegradable polymersomes as a basis for artificial cells: encapsulation, release and targeting

    J. Control. Release

    (2005)
  • D.A. Christian et al.

    Polymersome carriers: from self-assembly to siRNA and protein therapeutics

    Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.

    (2009)
  • K.K. Upadhyay et al.

    The intracellular drug delivery and anti tumor activity of doxorubicin loaded poly(gamma-benzyl l-glutamate)-B-hyaluronan polymersomes

    Biomaterials

    (2010)
  • H. Mei et al.

    EGFP-EGF1 protein-conjugated PEG-PLA nanoparticles for tissue factor targeted drug delivery

    Biomaterials

    (2010)
  • Y. Kim et al.

    Polymersome delivery of siRNA and antisense oligonucleotides

    J. Control. Release

    (2009)
  • S.J. Lee et al.

    Nanoparticles of magnetic ferric oxides encapsulated with poly(d, l latide-co-glycolide) and their applications to magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent

    J. Magn. Magn. Mater.

    (2004)
  • M. Talelli et al.

    Micelles based on HPMA copolymers

    Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.

    (2010)
  • S.C. Kim et al.

    In vivo evaluation of polymeric micellar paclitaxel formulation: toxicity and efficacy

    J. Control. Release

    (2001)
  • D.W. Kim et al.

    Multicenter phase II trial of Genexol-PM, a novel Cremophor-free, polymeric micelle formulation of paclitaxel, with cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

    Ann. Oncol.

    (2007)
  • W.T. Lim et al.

    Phase I pharmacokinetic study of a weekly liposomal paclitaxel formulation (Genexol-PM) in patients with solid tumors

    Ann. Oncol.

    (2010)
  • G.W. Kabalka et al.

    Gadolinium-labeled liposomes containing amphiphilic Gd-DTPA derivatives of varying chain-length — targeted MRI contrast enhancement agents for the liver

    Magn. Reson. Imaging

    (1991)
  • G.W. Kabalka et al.

    Gadolinium-labeled liposomes containing amphiphilic Gd-DTPA derivatives of varying chain length: targeted MRI contrast enhancement agents for the liver

    Magn. Reson. Imaging

    (1991)
  • R.A. Schwendener et al.

    Small unilamellar liposomes as magnetic resonance contrast agents loaded with paramagnetic Mn-, Gd-, and Fe-DTPA – stearate complexes

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1989)
  • M. Jaggi et al.

    Liposomes as carriers of 99mTc glucoheptonate for liver imaging

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1991)
  • V.S. Trubetskoy et al.

    Stable polymeric micelles: lymphangiographic contrast media for gamma scintigraphy and magnetic resonance imaging

    Acad. Radiol.

    (1996)
  • G.M. Whitesides

    The ‘right’ size in nanobiotechnology

    Nat. Biotechnol.

    (2003)
  • E. Miele et al.

    Albumin-bound formulation of paclitaxel (Abraxane ABI-007) in the treatment of breast cancer

    Int. J. Nanomedicine

    (2009)
  • F. Pene et al.

    Toward theragnostics

    Crit. Care Med.

    (2009)
  • C. Medina et al.

    Nanoparticles: pharmacological and toxicological significance

    Br. J. Pharmacol.

    (2007)
  • P.P. Adiseshaiah et al.

    Nanomaterial standards for efficacy and toxicity assessment

    Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol.

    (2010)
  • S.S. Tinkle

    Maximizing safe design of engineered nanomaterials: the NIH and NIEHS research perspective

    Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol.

    (2010)
  • M. Nahrendorf et al.

    Hybrid in vivo FMT-CT imaging of protease activity in atherosclerosis with customized nanosensors

    Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.

    (2009)
  • P. Debbage et al.

    Molecular imaging with nanoparticles: giant roles for dwarf actors

    Histochem. Cell Biol.

    (2008)
  • T.F. Massoud et al.

    Molecular imaging in living subjects: seeing fundamental biological processes in a new light

    Genes Dev.

    (2003)
  • K. Park et al.

    New generation of multifunctional nanoparticles for cancer imaging and therapy

    Adv. Funct. Mater.

    (2009)
  • C. Richard et al.

    Nanoparticles for imaging and tumor gene delivery

    Tumori

    (2008)
  • A.J. Beer et al.

    Imaging of integrin alphavbeta3 expression

    Cancer Metastasis Rev.

    (2008)
  • Cited by (1052)

    • Nanomaterials in theranostics

      2024, Handbook of Nanomaterials, Volume 2: Biomedicine, Environment, Food, and Agriculture
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This review is part of the Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews theme issue on “Development of Theranostic Agents that Co-Deliver Therapeutic and Imaging Agents”.

    1

    Authors contributed equally.

    View full text