General Obstetrics and Gynecology: Obstetrics
Correlates of intake of folic acid–containing supplements among pregnant women

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.06.018Get rights and content

Objective

This study describes the timing and correlates of folic acid supplement intake among pregnant women.

Study design

Data from 2518 women with estimated delivery dates from 1997 to 2000, collected for the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, a population-based case-control study, were analyzed. Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify correlates of supplement intake.

Results

Fifty-three percent of women began taking folic acid supplement during the periconceptional period, 35% during early pregnancy, and 8% during late pregnancy (ie, 3 months before through 1 month after conception, 2-3 months after conception, or more than 3 months after conception, respectively). Women who did not take folic acid supplement periconceptionally tended to be nonwhite, speak Spanish, have low education, be younger than 25 years old, be nulliparous, smoke, have no previous miscarriage and no fertility treatments, begin prenatal care and become aware of their pregnancy after the first trimester, have nonplanned pregnancies, and eat less breakfast cereal.

Conclusion

This study identifies correlates of folic acid supplement intake, which may contribute to the design of interventions to improve intake during early pregnancy.

Section snippets

Material and methods

This study included data on deliveries that had estimated due dates from October 1997 to December 2000 and were part of the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.17 This study is an approved activity of the institutional review boards of the participating study centers and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Each study site randomly selected approximately 100 nonmalformed, liveborn controls per study year from birth certificates (Iowa, Massachusetts, and New Jersey) or birth

Results

Among the 2518 women interviewed, 53% (1324) began taking FA supplements before or during the periconceptional period, 35% (879) during early pregnancy, and 8% (208) during late pregnancy, such that overall, 96% (2411) took FA supplements at some time during the 3 months before pregnancy or during pregnancy (Table I). Two percent of the women (39) took only non–FA-containing supplements, and 3% (68) took no supplements during this time period. Among women who took FA supplements, 94% (2256)

Comment

This study indicates that most (96%) women from several regions of the United States took FA supplements during pregnancy. However, only 53% took FA around the time of neural tube closure, which is completed by 4 weeks after conception.

Women who were not taking FA supplements during the first few weeks after conception (ie, the periconceptional period) tended to be nonwhite and younger than 25 years old, have low education, begin prenatal care and become aware of their pregnancy after the first

Acknowledgment

We thank Kathy Kelley, RPh, for her contributions to coding the data on the supplements.

References (28)

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

    Recommendations for the use of folic acid to reduce the number of cases of spina bifida and other neural tube defects

    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep

    (1992)
  • Institute of Medicine

    Dietary reference intakes for thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, vitamin B6, folate, vitamin B12, pantothenic acid, biotin, and choline

    (2000)
  • L.D. Botto et al.

    Do multivitamin or folic acid supplements reduce the risk for congenital heart defects? Evidence and gaps

    Am J Med Genet

    (2003)
  • M.M. Werler et al.

    Multivitamin supplementation and risk of birth defects

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1999)
  • G.M. Shaw et al.

    Risks of orofacial clefts in children born to women using multivitamins containing folic acid periconceptionally

    Lancet

    (1995)
  • G.M. Shaw et al.

    Maternal periconceptional use of multivitamins and reduced risk for conotruncal heart defects and limb deficiencies among offspring

    Am J Med Genet

    (1995)
  • E.M. Velie et al.

    Maternal supplemental and dietary zinc intake and the occurrence of neural tube defects in California

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1999)
  • M. Lucock

    Folic acid: nutritional biochemistry, molecular biology, and role in disease processes

    Mol Genet Metab

    (2000)
  • C.J. Lewis et al.

    Estimated folate intakes: data updated to reflect food fortification, increased bioavailability, and dietary supplement use

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (1999)
  • M.M. Werler et al.

    Achieving a public health recommendation for preventing neural tube defects with folic acid

    Am J Public Health

    (1999)
  • S. Yu et al.

    Preconceptional and prenatal multivitamin-mineral supplement use in the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey

    Am J Public Health

    (1996)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

    Use of vitamins containing folic acid among women of childbearing age—United States, 2004

    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep

    (2004)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

    Knowledge and use of folic acid by women of childbearing age—United States, 1995 and 1998

    MMWR Morb Mortal Weekly Rep

    (1999)
  • L.M. Williams et al.

    Surveillance for selected maternal behaviors and experiences before, during, and after pregnancy. Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2000

    MMWR Surveill Summ

    (2003)
  • Cited by (54)

    • Folic acid supplement use and the risk of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia

      2018, Women and Birth
      Citation Excerpt :

      For instance, a study using data from the 2001 to 2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey showed that a lower percentage of Hispanic women consumed the recommended dosage of folic acid from supplements and fortified foods compared to non-Hispanic White women.28 However, it should also be noted that a majority of women included in the study had characteristics, such as higher educational achievement, which have been shown to correlate with higher use of folic acid supplements.29,30 Further limitations, such as the high rates of comorbidities and possible selection bias, could limit generalizability of the study.

    • Epidemiological Factors in Developmental Toxicology

      2018, Comprehensive Toxicology: Third Edition
    • Periconceptional folic acid supplementation among women attending antenatal clinic in Anhui, China: Data from a population-based cohort study

      2012, Midwifery
      Citation Excerpt :

      A case-control study (de Jong-Van den Berg et al., 2005), based on data from Boston, Philadelphia, and Toronto, found that the use of folic acid in the periconceptional period was 40%. Finding from Australia (Watson et al., 2006) showed that less than 50% of women took periconceptional folate supplementation and data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study in the USA (Carmichael et al., 2006) reported that rate of folic acid supplement intake was 53% during the periconceptional period. A recent survey from South Korea (Kim et al., 2009) of 1277 women, found only 10.3% took folic acid periconceptionally.

    • Lack of periconceptional vitamins or supplements that contain folic acid and diabetes mellitusassociated birth defects

      2012, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
      Citation Excerpt :

      If exact dates of use were unknown, mothers could report less specific information, such as a pregnancy month (eg, first month of pregnancy) or time of year (eg, beginning of the year), which was converted into dates to determine the timing of the use in relation to the pregnancy. NBDPS investigators determined whether the specific product that was reported contained folic acid.33 Periconceptional users of vitamins or supplements that contain folic acid were identified as mothers who reported any use during the month before conception or during the first 3 months of pregnancy.

    • Epidemiological Factors in Developmental Toxicology

      2010, Comprehensive Toxicology, Second Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported by a cooperative agreement from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Centers of Excellence (Award no. U50/CCU913241) and National Institutes of Health Grant R01 HD042538-01.

    View full text