Regular article
Cell injury, repair, aging and apoptosis
Cathepsin Cleavage of Sirtuin 1 in Endothelial Progenitor Cells Mediates Stress-Induced Premature Senescence

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.11.033Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Stress-induced premature senescence (SIPS) of endothelial cells (ECs) has emerged as a contributor to global EC dysfunction. One of the cellular abnormalities mechanistically linked to SIPS is lysosomal dysfunction. In this study, we examined the impact of a range of cardiovascular risk factors on the expression of sirtuin 1 (SIRT1), SIPS, and apoptosis, and we documented the role of SIRT1 in reduced EC and endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) viability. These findings were confirmed in mice with selective endothelial SIRT1 knockout. The effects of stressors could be partially mimicked by inducing lysosomal membrane permeabilization or inhibiting autophagy, and were reversed by a cathepsin inhibitor. We provide evidence that SIRT1 is an important substrate of cysteine cathepsins B, S, and L. An antioxidant/peroxynitrite scavenger, ebselen, prevented stress-induced SIRT1 depletion and subversion of autophagy by mitigating lysosomal dysfunction. In conclusion, our data advance the concept of “stem cell aging” by establishing the critical role of lysosomal dysfunction in the development of SIPS through the cathepsin-induced proteolytic cleavage of SIRT1, a mechanism linking cell stress to apoptosis and SIPS. Ebselen potently protects lysosomal membrane integrity, preventing cathepsin-induced cleavage of SIRT 1 in EPCs and blunting SIPS and apoptotic cell death induced by relevant cardiovascular stressors. The proposed mechanism of SIRT1 depletion in stress has all of the attributes of being a paradigm of SIPS of EPCs.

Cited by (0)

These studies were supported in part by NIH grants DK54602, DK052783, and DK45462, the Westchester Artificial Kidney Foundation (M.S.G.), and by Slovene Research Agency grants P1-0140 and J1-3602 (B.T.).

A guest editor acted as editor-in-chief for the manuscript. No person at Thomas Jefferson University was involved in the peer review process or final disposition of this article.