Elsevier

Alcohol

Volume 41, Issue 2, March 2007, Pages 95-132
Alcohol

Functional gene expression differences between inbred alcohol-preferring and –non-preferring rats in five brain regions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcohol.2007.03.003Get rights and content

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine if there are innate differences in gene expression in selected CNS regions between inbred alcohol-preferring (iP) and –non-preferring (iNP) rats. Gene expression was determined in the nucleus accumbens (ACB), amygdala (AMYG), frontal cortex (FC), caudate-putamen (CPU), and hippocampus (HIPP) of alcohol-naïve adult male iP and iNP rats, using Affymetrix Rat Genome U34A microarrays (n = 6/strain). Using Linear Modeling for Microarray Analysis with a false discovery rate threshold of 0.1, there were 16 genes with differential expression in the ACB, 54 in the AMYG, 8 in the FC, 24 in the CPU, and 21 in the HIPP. When examining the main effect of strain across regions, 296 genes were differentially expressed. Although the relatively small number of genes found significant within individual regions precluded a powerful analysis for over-represented Gene Ontology categories, the much larger list resulting from the main effect of strain analysis produced 17 over-represented categories (P < .05), including axon guidance, gliogenesis, negative regulation of programmed cell death, regulation of programmed cell death, regulation of synapse structure function, and transmission of nerve impulse. Co-citation analysis and graphing of significant genes revealed a network involved in the neuropeptide Y (NPY) transmitter system. Correlation of all significant genes with those located within previously established rat alcohol QTLs revealed that of the total of 313 significant genes, 71 are located within such QTLs. The many regional and overall gene expression differences between the iP and iNP rat lines may contribute to the divergent alcohol drinking phenotypes of these rats.

Introduction

Alcoholism and alcohol abuse are complex disorders that result from a combination of genetic and environmental factors. Selective breeding strategies for ethanol preference have yielded divergent rat lines that possess different frequencies of genes that impact ethanol preference, whereas the frequency of trait-irrelevant genes remains randomly distributed (Lumeng et al., 1977). The alcohol-preferring (P) and alcohol–non-preferring (NP) rat lines were established from a randomly bred, closed colony of Wistar rats using free-choice access to 10% (vol/vol) ethanol and water (Lumeng et al., 1977). P rats meet the proposed criteria (Cicero, 1979) for an animal model of alcoholism (reviewed in McBride and Li, 1998, Murphy et al., 2002). In brief, the P line of rats (1) consumes in excess of 5 g ethanol/kg body weight/day, attaining blood alcohol concentrations in the range of 50–200 mg%; (2) works to obtain ethanol when food and water are freely available; (3) consumes ethanol for its pharmacological effects, and not solely for caloric value nor taste or odor properties; (4) develops functional and metabolic tolerance; (5) develops physical dependence; and (6) demonstrates robust relapse ethanol drinking after a period of abstinence. On the other hand, NP rats consume less than 1 g ethanol/kg/day and do not attain measurable blood alcohol concentrations under free-choice conditions. Compared to NP rats, P rats are more sensitive to the low-dose stimulating effects of ethanol (Rodd et al., 2004, Waller et al., 1986), less sensitive to the high-dose motor impairing effects of ethanol (Lumeng et al., 1982), and develop acute tolerance more rapidly (Waller et al., 1983).

Innate differences in neurotransmitter and receptor systems in several brain regions have been reported between the selectively bred P and NP rat lines (reviewed in McBride and Li, 1998, Murphy et al., 2002). P rats have reduced serotonin (5-HT) and dopamine (DA) innervations (Zhou et al., 1991, Zhou et al., 1994a, Zhou et al., 1994b, Zhou et al., 1995), as well as differences in 5-HT (McBride et al., 1993a, McBride et al., 1994, McBride et al., 1997, Wong et al., 1993), DA (McBride et al., 1993b), and opioid (McBride et al., 1998, Strother et al., 2001) receptors. Furthermore, neuropeptide Y (NPY) (Ehlers et al., 1998), corticotropin-releasing factor (Ehlers et al., 1992), neurotensin (Ehlers et al., 1999), substance P, and neurokinin levels (Slawecki et al., 2001) are all significantly lower in CNS regions of P compared to NP rats. Additionally, higher functional neuronal activity has been found in numerous brain regions of the P rat compared to the NP rat (Smith et al., 2001, Strother et al., 2005).

Witzmann et al. (2003) examined differences in protein levels in the hippocampus (HIPP) and nucleus accumbens (ACB) of alcohol-naïve inbred-P (iP) and inbred-NP (iNP) rats, and found that almost all of the proteins that differed were lower in the iP rats compared to the iNP rats. Those proteins that could be identified were involved in many key aspects of neuronal function such as metabolism, cell signaling, and protein transport, which may suggest that there are basic differences in synaptic transmission mechanisms between the two rat strains (Witzmann et al., 2003). Edenberg et al. (2005) compared gene expression differences in the HIPP of two different strains of iP and iNP rats, when microarray analyses were conducted several months apart. The results indicated excellent repeatability of the assay. Genes involved in cell growth and adhesion, cellular stress reduction and antioxidation, protein trafficking, cellular signaling pathways, and synaptic function were differentially expressed in the HIPP (Edenberg et al., 2005). Worst et al. (2005) reported on the transcriptome analysis in the anterior cerebral cortex of alcohol-naïve Alko, alcohol (AA) and Alko, nonalcohol (ANA) rats, and found differences in mRNA levels between the AA and ANA rats that could alter transmitter release (e.g., vesicle-associated membrane protein 2, syntaxin 1, syntaxin binding protein). Kerns et al. (2005) examined gene expression differences in response to acute ethanol in the ACB, prefrontal cortex, and ventral tegmental area of C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice, which have high and low alcohol drinking characteristics, respectively. Ethanol-regulated genes were region specific and involved in glucocorticoid signaling, neurogenesis, myelination, neuropeptide signaling, and retinoic acid signaling. Gene expression profiles were also reported for whole brain of inbred long-sleep and inbred short-sleep mice (Xu et al., 2001). A total of 41 genes or expressed sequence tags (ESTs) displayed significant differences between these inbred strains of mice. Expression of genes encoding tyrosine protein kinase and ubiquitin carboxyl terminal hydrolase was higher in the brain of inbred long-sleep compared to short-sleep mice. In a comprehensive transcriptome meta-analysis of different mice strains, Mulligan et al. (2006) identified several cis-regulated candidate genes for an alcohol preference quantitative trait loci (QTL) on chromosome 9.

Portions of the present data have been used for comparison analyses in two recently published studies, although none of the present data have been presented in duplicate form. In one study, the present HIPP data were used with other HIPP data to evaluate the reliability of the microarray analysis, when assays were conducted months apart (Edenberg et al., 2005). In the second study (Rodd et al., 2006), the data were used as part of a convergent functional genomics approach to identify common genes across different experimental approaches and between human and animal findings. In that study, however, the iP–iNP data were not analyzed using rigorous statistical criteria (for a gene to be considered significant, an false discovery rate (FDR)-uncorrected P < .05 was considered sufficient), and the results were presented only in a summarized format, which were then integrated with information from other studies. As the P and NP lines are well established animal models in the alcohol field, we believe it is important that the present findings, derived using rigorous region-by-region analyses, are presented because they yield a much more complete and statistically reliable picture of the genetic factors involved in the high and low alcohol drinking behavior in these rat lines.

The objective of the present study was to determine if there are innate differences between inbred P and NP rats in the expression of functionally relevant genes in selected brain regions. The current study focuses on five distinct brain regions: the ACB, caudate-putamen (CPU), amygdala (AMYG), HIPP, and frontal cortex (FC). These regions were selected based on their inclusion in the mesolimbic and mesocortical systems, both of which are critically important in the initiation and maintenance of goal directed and reward mediated behaviors (reviewed in Bonci et al., 2003; and Maldonado, 2003).

Section snippets

Animals and RNA preparation

Inbred adult male rats, 90–100 days old, from the iP-5C and iNP-1 strains were used in these experiments. Inbreeding by brother–sister mating was initiated after the S30 generation of mass selection and was in the F37 generation at the start of these experiments. It should be noted that the iP and iNP rats have not been characterized to the extent to which the parent selected lines have been studied. However, preliminary studies indicate that alcohol intake (Bell et al., 2004), and differences

Results

Principal component analysis, using all probe sets that passed through the filters described in Methods, indicated that regional differences in gene expression were greater than strain differences, as illustrated by a biplot of the first and second principal components (Fig. 1). The clusters representing arrays from the ACB, CPU, and FC are tightly grouped, with the exception of one outlier in each region. Those from the HIPP give a fairly good grouping, but not as tight as the other three

Discussion

The major findings of this study were that (1) there was a greater degree of between-region differential expression than within-region, between-strain differential expression (Fig. 1); (2) there was within-region, between-strain differential expression in all five regions examined, with many of these genes classifiable as being related to neurotransmission (Table 8), neuroplasticity (Table 9), intracellular messaging (Table 10), and regulation of transcription (Table 11), with the AMYG as the

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by AA07611, AA07462, AA13521 [INIA], and AA16652 [INIA]. Microarrays were analyzed using the facilities of the Center for Medical Genomics at Indiana University School of Medicine, which is supported in part by the Indiana Genomics Initiative (INGEN®) of Indiana University. INGEN is supported in part by the Lilly Endowment Inc.

References (98)

  • H. Long et al.

    Conserved roles for Slit and Robo proteins in midline commissural axon guidance

    Neuron

    (2004)
  • L. Lumeng et al.

    New strains of rats with alcohol preference and nonpreference

  • L. Lumeng et al.

    Different sensitivities to ethanol in alcohol-preferring and -nonpreferring rats

    Pharmacol Biochem Behav

    (1982)
  • W.J. McBride et al.

    Densities of dopamine D2 receptors are reduced in CNS regions of alcohol-preferring P rats

    Alcohol

    (1993)
  • W.J. McBride et al.

    Quantitative autoradiography of mu-opioid receptors in the CNS of alcohol-naive alcohol-preferring P and -nonpreferring NP rats

    Alcohol

    (1998)
  • W.J. McBride et al.

    Regional CNS densities of monoamine receptors in alcohol-naive alcohol-preferring P and -nonpreferring NP rats

    Alcohol

    (1997)
  • W.J. McBride et al.

    Regional serotonin-1A receptors in the CNS of alcohol-preferring and –nonpreferring rats

    Pharmacol Biochem Behav

    (1994)
  • J.J. Miguel-Hidalgo et al.

    Glia pathology in the prefrontal cortex in alcohol dependence with and without depressive symptoms

    Biol Psychiatry

    (2002)
  • M.S. Rao et al.

    Effects of ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) and depolarization on neuropeptide expression in cultured sympathetic neurons

    Dev Biol

    (1992)
  • J.P. Schroeder et al.

    The neuropeptide-Y Y5 receptor antagonist L-152,804 decreases alcohol self-administration in inbred alcohol-preferring (iP) rats

    Alcohol

    (2005)
  • E.-Y. Shin et al.

    Phosphorylation of p85 beta PIX, a Rac/Cdc42-specific guanine nucleotide exchange factor, via the Ras/ERK/PAK2 pathway is required for basic fibroblast growth factor-induced neurite outgrowth

    J Biol Chem

    (2002)
  • W.N. Strother et al.

    Regional central nervous system densities of delta-opioid receptors in alcohol-preferring P, alcohol-nonpreferring NP, and unselected Wistar rats

    Alcohol

    (2001)
  • W.N. Strother et al.

    Acute ethanol effects on cerebral glucose utilization in adult alcohol-preferring P and alcohol nonpreferring NP rats

    Alcohol

    (2005)
  • G. Szabo et al.

    Brain-derived neurotrophic factor, neurotrophin-3 and neurotrophin-4/5 maintain functional tolerance to ethanol

    Eur J Pharmacol

    (1995)
  • H. Thompson et al.

    Slits contribute to the guidance of retinal ganglion cell axons in the mammalian optic tract

    Dev Biol

    (2006)
  • M.B. Waller et al.

    Initial sensitivity and acute tolerance to ethanol in the P and NP lines of rats

    Pharmacol Biochem Behav

    (1983)
  • M.B. Waller et al.

    Effect of low dose ethanol on spontaneous motor activity in alcohol-preferring and -nonpreferring lines of rats

    Pharmacol Biochem Behav

    (1986)
  • M.J. Wirth et al.

    Epigenetic factors regulate the NPY expression in rat cortical neurons

    Regul Pept

    (1998)
  • D.T. Wong et al.

    Greater abundance of serotonin1A receptor in some brain areas of alcohol-preferring (P) rats compared to nonpreferring (NP) rats

    Pharmacol Biochem Behav

    (1993)
  • F.C. Zhou et al.

    Immunostained serotonergic fibers are decreased in selected brain regions of alcohol-preferring rats

    Alcohol

    (1991)
  • F.C. Zhou et al.

    Serotonergic neurons in the alcohol-preferring rats

    Alcohol

    (1994)
  • F.C. Zhou et al.

    Mesolimbic dopamine system in alcohol-preferring rats

    Alcohol

    (1995)
  • C.M. Aragon et al.

    Studies on ethanol-brain catalase interaction: evidence for central ethanol oxidation

    Alcohol Clin Exp Res

    (1991)
  • M. Ashburner et al.

    Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium

    Nat Genet

    (2000)
  • T. Barrett et al.

    NCBI GEO: mining millions of expression profiles—database and tools

    Nucleic Acids Res

    (2005)
  • R.L. Bell et al.

    Repeated daily scheduled access results in binge-like ethanol consumption in adult inbred P rats

    Alcohol Clin Exp Res

    (2004)
  • R.L. Bell et al.

    Responsivity and development of tolerance to the motor impairing effects of moderate doses of ethanol in alcohol-preferring (P) and -nonpreferring (NP) rat lines

    Alcohol Clin Exp Res

    (2001)
  • Y. Benjamini et al.

    Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing

    J R Stat Soc(B)

    (1995)
  • P. Bice et al.

    Genomic screen for QTLs underlying alcohol consumption in the P and NP rat lines

    Mamm Genome

    (1998)
  • S. Bluher et al.

    Ciliary neurotrophic factorAx15 alters energy homeostasis, decreases body weight, and improves metabolic control in diet-induced obese and UCP1-DTA mice

    Diabetes

    (2004)
  • L.G. Carr et al.

    A quantitative trait locus for alcohol consumption in selectively bred rat lines

    Alcohol Clin Exp Res

    (1998)
  • L.G. Carr et al.

    Analyses of quantitative trait loci contributing to alcohol preference in HAD1/LAD1 and HAD2/LAD2 rats

    Alcohol Clin Exp Res

    (2003)
  • D.S. Choi et al.

    Conditional rescue of protein kinase C epsilon regulates ethanol preference and hypnotic sensitivity in adult mice

    J Neurosci

    (2002)
  • T.J. Cicero

    A critique of animal analogues of alcoholism

  • G. Cohen et al.

    Ethanol oxidation by rat brain in vivo

    Alcohol Clin Exp Res

    (1980)
  • K.M. Cullen et al.

    Chronic alcoholics have substantial glial pathology in the forebrain and diencephalon

    Alcohol Alcohol

    (1994)
  • C. Dean et al.

    Neurexin mediates the assembly of presynaptic terminals

    Nat Neurosci

    (2003)
  • S. Di Giovanni et al.

    Neuronal plasticity after spinal cord injury: identification of a gene cluster driving neurite outgrowth

    FASEB J

    (2004)
  • H.J. Edenberg et al.

    Gene expression in the hippocampus of inbred alcohol-preferring and -nonpreferring rats

    Genes Brain Behav

    (2005)
  • Cited by (95)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text