Review and special articleRevisiting Kurt Lewin: How to Gain Insight into Environmental Correlates of Obesogenic Behaviors
Introduction
Energy intake and energy expenditure behaviors underlie today’s obesity epidemic. The underlying determinants of obesogenic behaviors are, however, less clear. Kurt Lewin’s renowned “field theory”1 posits that human behavior is the function of both the person and the environment. For many years, behavioral determinant research focused mostly on personal correlates of behavior. However, especially since Egger and Swinburn2 introduced their ecologic paradigm for understanding obesity, and argued that the present day “obesogenic environment” induces obesogenic behavior,3 more and more research tries to explore if and how environmental factors are associated with obesity-related behaviors. To summarize the available scientific evidence, recently a series of systematic reviews was conducted of studies on environmental factors and obesity-related behaviors.4 In this paper, the rationale, main results, and conclusions from this review project are briefly described, and it is discussed how we should proceed to further dissect the obesogenic environment.
Section snippets
Personal and Environmental Correlates of Obesogenic Behaviors
In order to develop interventions to promote obesity-prevention behaviors, insight into the behavioral determinants is necessary.5 Each of the aforementioned obesogenic behaviors may have different determinants; people’s “reasons” for not eating enough fruits and vegetables may be very different from their reasons for spending too much time watching television.6
Health education has been the primary tool to encourage the general public to adopt health-promoting lifestyles. Health education has
What Is “The Environment”?
The Analysis Grid for Environments Linked to Obesity (ANGELO)3 was developed for the investigation of obesogenic environments. ANGELO is a grid with two axes. On one axis two “sizes” of environment (micro and macro) are distinguished. Micro-environments are defined as environmental settings where groups of people meet and gather, geographically distinct, with room for direct mutual influence between individuals and the environment. Examples of micro-environments are homes, schools, workplaces,
Discussion
Our systematic reviews indicate that the notion of an environment that promotes obesogenic behaviors currently lacks a sound base of scientific evidence. These shortcomings in the evidence may especially be due to a lack of studies with strong study designs and measures. How should we proceed to better study and dissect the environmental determinants of nutrition and physical activity behaviors? Three famous quotes from Kurt Lewin guided us.
There is nothing so practical as a good theory.1
The
Conclusion
It is clear that our environment has changed over the past decades. It now offers almost constant opportunities to eat palatable energy-dense foods and enables almost total avoidance of physical activity.20, 21, 22 This may make it extremely difficult for people to act on their positive intentions to prevent weight gain.23 However, our systematic attempt to further dissect the presumed obesogenic environment did not provide much convincing evidence. Most likely, more insight can be gained from
References (23)
- et al.
Dissecting obesogenic environments: the development and application of a framework for identifying and prioritizing environmental interventions for obesity
Prev Med
(1999) The epidemic of obesity and changes in food intake: the fluoride hypothesis
Physiol Behav
(2004)- et al.
Preventing childhood obesity: a solution-oriented research paradigm
Am J Prev Med
(2005) Field theory in social science;selected theoretical papers
(1951)- et al.
An “ecological” approach to the obesity pandemic
BMJ
(1997) - et al.
Environmental determinants and interventions for physical activity, diet and smoking: a review
(2005) - et al.
Theory, evidence and intervention mapping to improve behavioral nutrition and physical activity interventions
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act
(2005) - et al.
Cognitive determinants of energy balance-related behaviours: measurement issues
Sports Med
(2005) - et al.
Health promotion planning: an educational and ecological approach
(1999) - et al.
Increasing the health promotive capacity of human environments
Am J Health Promot
(2003)
Environmental factors that increase the food intake and consumption volume of unknowing consumers
Annu Rev Nutr
Cited by (98)
Health benefits of green spaces in the living environment: A systematic review of epidemiological studies
2015, Urban Forestry and Urban GreeningCitation Excerpt :In the past two decades, conviction has gained ground that in order to be effective in promoting health and healthy behaviour, public health interventions have to address not only individual characteristics but also the physical and social environment (Brug et al., 2006; Egger and Swinburn, 1997; Macintyre et al., 2002).
ADIPOQ and ADIPOR2 gene polymorphisms: Association with overweight/obesity in Mexican children
2015, Boletin Medico del Hospital Infantil de MexicoA free-produce stand on campus: Impact on fruit and vegetable intake in Dutch university students
2020, Public Health NutritionThe role of socio-economic position as a moderator of children's healthy food intake
2014, British Journal of Nutrition